{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97502"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97502","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Topic development in the English oral proficiency interview for international teaching assistants at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","abstract":"The present study examines how a topic is initiated and is developed and expanded for additional questions in order to probe an International Teaching Assistant (ITA) candidate’s oral proficiency in an unscripted interview test. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) had employed SPEAK (Speaking Proficiency English Assessment Kit), a computer-mediated test, to assess ITA candidates’ speaking ability for decades. However, with increasing criticism about the SPEAK in terms of face validity, authenticity and technical problems, a new oral test for ITAs was developed. The new test, the English Proficiency Interview (EPI hereafter), began to be administered in the Summer of 2010, and is conducted via the format of an unscripted interview. The EPI does not provide an interviewer with pre set questions in advance. Topics are initiated spontaneously the on test site and negotiated in the course of discourse. Questions are formulated based on the response that the test taker had provided during the interview. Thus, each interview in the EPI consists of an individualized form of discourse and has its own path in topic development. Findings of discourse analysis are presented using 7 EPIs, which were selected from interviews gathered in the first field trial of the new test in 2009. The interview process is illustrated with excerpts taken from actual interviews. Analysis of the data revealed that the interviewer initiated a topic in the following category: a) initiating a topic from the candidate’s field of study, and b) initiating a topic from the candidate’s interest and life in general. In addition, some features of both conversation and interview are discussed as the EPI is found to have both. Finally, future studies are suggested with reference to topic development across test takers’ language proficiency level. This study is primarily descriptive and suggestive rather than conclusive.","abstract_html":"The present study examines how a topic is initiated and is developed and expanded for additional questions in order to probe an International Teaching Assistant (ITA) candidate’s oral proficiency in an unscripted interview test. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) had employed SPEAK (Speaking Proficiency English Assessment Kit), a computer-mediated test, to assess ITA candidates’ speaking ability for decades. However, with increasing criticism about the SPEAK in terms of face validity, authenticity and technical problems, a new oral test for ITAs was developed. The new test, the English Proficiency Interview (EPI hereafter), began to be administered in the Summer of 2010, and is conducted via the format of an unscripted interview. The EPI does not provide an interviewer with pre set questions in advance. Topics are initiated spontaneously the on test site and negotiated in the course of discourse. Questions are formulated based on the response that the test taker had provided during the interview. Thus, each interview in the EPI consists of an individualized form of discourse and has its own path in topic development. Findings of discourse analysis are presented using 7 EPIs, which were selected from interviews gathered in the first field trial of the new test in 2009. The interview process is illustrated with excerpts taken from actual interviews. Analysis of the data revealed that the interviewer initiated a topic in the following category: a) initiating a topic from the candidate’s field of study, and b) initiating a topic from the candidate’s interest and life in general. In addition, some features of both conversation and interview are discussed as the EPI is found to have both. Finally, future studies are suggested with reference to topic development across test takers’ language proficiency level. This study is primarily descriptive and suggestive rather than conclusive.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kim, Kyeongsuk"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Teaching English as a Second Language","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Yan, Xun","Sadler, Randall"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-08-10T19:16:18Z","date_published":"2017-08-10T19:16:18Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z","subjects":["The English Proficiency Interview (EPI)","International teaching assistant (ITA)","Topic development","Conversation","Interview","Language assessment"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Kyeongsuk Kim"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97502","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Yan, Xun","Sadler, Randall"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kim, Kyeongsuk"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-08-10T19:16:18Z","2017-04-28","2017-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Teaching English as a Second Language"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["The English Proficiency Interview (EPI)","International teaching assistant (ITA)","Topic development","Conversation","Interview","Language assessment"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Kyeongsuk Kim"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97502"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The present study examines how a topic is initiated and is developed and expanded for additional questions in order to probe an International Teaching Assistant (ITA) candidate’s oral proficiency in an unscripted interview test. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) had employed SPEAK (Speaking Proficiency English Assessment Kit), a computer-mediated test, to assess ITA candidates’ speaking ability for decades. However, with increasing criticism about the SPEAK in terms of face validity, authenticity and technical problems, a new oral test for ITAs was developed. The new test, the English Proficiency Interview (EPI hereafter), began to be administered in the Summer of 2010, and is conducted via the format of an unscripted interview. The EPI does not provide an interviewer with pre set questions in advance. Topics are initiated spontaneously the on test site and negotiated in the course of discourse. Questions are formulated based on the response that the test taker had provided during the interview. Thus, each interview in the EPI consists of an individualized form of discourse and has its own path in topic development. Findings of discourse analysis are presented using 7 EPIs, which were selected from interviews gathered in the first field trial of the new test in 2009. The interview process is illustrated with excerpts taken from actual interviews. Analysis of the data revealed that the interviewer initiated a topic in the following category: a) initiating a topic from the candidate’s field of study, and b) initiating a topic from the candidate’s interest and life in general. In addition, some features of both conversation and interview are discussed as the EPI is found to have both. Finally, future studies are suggested with reference to topic development across test takers’ language proficiency level. This study is primarily descriptive and suggestive rather than conclusive.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2017-08-10 without embargo terms","The student, Kyeongsuk Kim, accepted the attached license on 2017-04-26 at 18:16.","The student, Kyeongsuk Kim, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-04-26 at 18:35.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-04-28 at 09:04.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11104 on 2017-08-10 at 13:46:52","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T19:16:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 KIM-THESIS-2017.pdf: 646918 bytes, checksum: 38dbc841ee7f3efc085e76442b611ca6 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 86db6c88ae12623469340c52475f0844 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-28"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Topic development in the English oral proficiency interview for international teaching assistants at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Yan, Xun","Sadler, Randall"],"dc:creator":["Kim, Kyeongsuk"],"dc:date":["2017-08-10T19:16:18Z","2017-04-28","2017-05"],"dc:description":["The present study examines how a topic is initiated and is developed and expanded for additional questions in order to probe an International Teaching Assistant (ITA) candidate’s oral proficiency in an unscripted interview test. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) had employed SPEAK (Speaking Proficiency English Assessment Kit), a computer-mediated test, to assess ITA candidates’ speaking ability for decades. However, with increasing criticism about the SPEAK in terms of face validity, authenticity and technical problems, a new oral test for ITAs was developed. The new test, the English Proficiency Interview (EPI hereafter), began to be administered in the Summer of 2010, and is conducted via the format of an unscripted interview. The EPI does not provide an interviewer with pre set questions in advance. Topics are initiated spontaneously the on test site and negotiated in the course of discourse. Questions are formulated based on the response that the test taker had provided during the interview. Thus, each interview in the EPI consists of an individualized form of discourse and has its own path in topic development. Findings of discourse analysis are presented using 7 EPIs, which were selected from interviews gathered in the first field trial of the new test in 2009. The interview process is illustrated with excerpts taken from actual interviews. Analysis of the data revealed that the interviewer initiated a topic in the following category: a) initiating a topic from the candidate’s field of study, and b) initiating a topic from the candidate’s interest and life in general. In addition, some features of both conversation and interview are discussed as the EPI is found to have both. Finally, future studies are suggested with reference to topic development across test takers’ language proficiency level. This study is primarily descriptive and suggestive rather than conclusive.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2017-08-10 without embargo terms","The student, Kyeongsuk Kim, accepted the attached license on 2017-04-26 at 18:16.","The student, Kyeongsuk Kim, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-04-26 at 18:35.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-04-28 at 09:04.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11104 on 2017-08-10 at 13:46:52","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T19:16:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 KIM-THESIS-2017.pdf: 646918 bytes, checksum: 38dbc841ee7f3efc085e76442b611ca6 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 86db6c88ae12623469340c52475f0844 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-28"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97502"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Kyeongsuk Kim"],"dc:subject":["The English Proficiency Interview (EPI)","International teaching assistant (ITA)","Topic development","Conversation","Interview","Language assessment"],"dc:title":["Topic development in the English oral proficiency interview for international teaching assistants at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Teaching English as a Second Language"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z"}