{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97456"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97456","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Blast diagnostic tools and techniques: a review","abstract":"Pressure measurements are essential in determining the energy output from shock waves generated by high explosives. Thus, it is imperative to choose appropriate sensors and measurement techniques to consistently acquire useful data. Past studies conducted in diagnostics of energetic materials were focused on the energy release and the material properties, but very few, if any, placed an emphasis on the actual diagnostic tools and techniques. There are two main types of pressure transducers utilized in the industry today: piezoresistive and piezoelectric. Piezoresistive sensors experience a change in internal resistance when the sensing material is subjected to mechanical strain, while piezoelectric sensors generate an electric charge when placed under a similar condition. In addition to the two industry standards the Manganin pressure sensor also plays an important role in blast diagnostics. This type of sensor represents a niche part of the pressure transducer market and are primarily used to capture the detonation pressure for high explosives. In this study, appropriate measurement techniques, in addition to the tools utilized, were examined to achieve seamless data collection. Electric noise reduction and data loss prevention techniques were explored in this study. Some of these techniques include: adding feed-through terminator to reduce signal output, creating protective barriers surrounding signal cables, and reducing amplifier-to-gauge cable length. Through preparation and application of appropriate techniques, valuable data can be adequately acquired on a consistent basis with minimal disturbances.","abstract_html":"Pressure measurements are essential in determining the energy output from shock waves generated by high explosives. Thus, it is imperative to choose appropriate sensors and measurement techniques to consistently acquire useful data. Past studies conducted in diagnostics of energetic materials were focused on the energy release and the material properties, but very few, if any, placed an emphasis on the actual diagnostic tools and techniques. There are two main types of pressure transducers utilized in the industry today: piezoresistive and piezoelectric. Piezoresistive sensors experience a change in internal resistance when the sensing material is subjected to mechanical strain, while piezoelectric sensors generate an electric charge when placed under a similar condition. In addition to the two industry standards the Manganin pressure sensor also plays an important role in blast diagnostics. This type of sensor represents a niche part of the pressure transducer market and are primarily used to capture the detonation pressure for high explosives. In this study, appropriate measurement techniques, in addition to the tools utilized, were examined to achieve seamless data collection. Electric noise reduction and data loss prevention techniques were explored in this study. Some of these techniques include: adding feed-through terminator to reduce signal output, creating protective barriers surrounding signal cables, and reducing amplifier-to-gauge cable length. Through preparation and application of appropriate techniques, valuable data can be adequately acquired on a consistent basis with minimal disturbances.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Desanti, Young Wayne"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Mechanical Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Glumac, Nick G."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-08-10T19:16:00Z","date_published":"2017-08-10T19:16:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z","subjects":["Explosives","Energetic materials","Pressure transducer","Optic diagnostics","Piezoelectric","Piezoresistive","Manganin"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Young Desanti"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97456","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Glumac, Nick G."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Desanti, Young Wayne"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-08-10T19:16:00Z","2017-04-25","2017-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Mechanical Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Explosives","Energetic materials","Pressure transducer","Optic diagnostics","Piezoelectric","Piezoresistive","Manganin"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Young Desanti"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97456"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Pressure measurements are essential in determining the energy output from shock waves generated by high explosives. Thus, it is imperative to choose appropriate sensors and measurement techniques to consistently acquire useful data. Past studies conducted in diagnostics of energetic materials were focused on the energy release and the material properties, but very few, if any, placed an emphasis on the actual diagnostic tools and techniques. There are two main types of pressure transducers utilized in the industry today: piezoresistive and piezoelectric. Piezoresistive sensors experience a change in internal resistance when the sensing material is subjected to mechanical strain, while piezoelectric sensors generate an electric charge when placed under a similar condition. In addition to the two industry standards the Manganin pressure sensor also plays an important role in blast diagnostics. This type of sensor represents a niche part of the pressure transducer market and are primarily used to capture the detonation pressure for high explosives. In this study, appropriate measurement techniques, in addition to the tools utilized, were examined to achieve seamless data collection. Electric noise reduction and data loss prevention techniques were explored in this study. Some of these techniques include: adding feed-through terminator to reduce signal output, creating protective barriers surrounding signal cables, and reducing amplifier-to-gauge cable length. Through preparation and application of appropriate techniques, valuable data can be adequately acquired on a consistent basis with minimal disturbances.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2017-08-10 without embargo terms","The student, Young Desanti, accepted the attached license on 2017-04-24 at 14:43.","The student, Young Desanti, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-04-24 at 14:52.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-04-25 at 17:19.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11016 on 2017-08-10 at 13:45:41","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T19:16:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 DESANTI-THESIS-2017.pdf: 1977349 bytes, checksum: b590224582a8962283315afd6515ac63 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: b777d55627ad52ccd387cc58e8d29414 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-25"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Blast diagnostic tools and techniques: a review"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Glumac, Nick G."],"dc:creator":["Desanti, Young Wayne"],"dc:date":["2017-08-10T19:16:00Z","2017-04-25","2017-05"],"dc:description":["Pressure measurements are essential in determining the energy output from shock waves generated by high explosives. Thus, it is imperative to choose appropriate sensors and measurement techniques to consistently acquire useful data. Past studies conducted in diagnostics of energetic materials were focused on the energy release and the material properties, but very few, if any, placed an emphasis on the actual diagnostic tools and techniques. There are two main types of pressure transducers utilized in the industry today: piezoresistive and piezoelectric. Piezoresistive sensors experience a change in internal resistance when the sensing material is subjected to mechanical strain, while piezoelectric sensors generate an electric charge when placed under a similar condition. In addition to the two industry standards the Manganin pressure sensor also plays an important role in blast diagnostics. This type of sensor represents a niche part of the pressure transducer market and are primarily used to capture the detonation pressure for high explosives. In this study, appropriate measurement techniques, in addition to the tools utilized, were examined to achieve seamless data collection. Electric noise reduction and data loss prevention techniques were explored in this study. Some of these techniques include: adding feed-through terminator to reduce signal output, creating protective barriers surrounding signal cables, and reducing amplifier-to-gauge cable length. Through preparation and application of appropriate techniques, valuable data can be adequately acquired on a consistent basis with minimal disturbances.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2017-08-10 without embargo terms","The student, Young Desanti, accepted the attached license on 2017-04-24 at 14:43.","The student, Young Desanti, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-04-24 at 14:52.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-04-25 at 17:19.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11016 on 2017-08-10 at 13:45:41","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T19:16:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 DESANTI-THESIS-2017.pdf: 1977349 bytes, checksum: b590224582a8962283315afd6515ac63 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: b777d55627ad52ccd387cc58e8d29414 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-25"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97456"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Young Desanti"],"dc:subject":["Explosives","Energetic materials","Pressure transducer","Optic diagnostics","Piezoelectric","Piezoresistive","Manganin"],"dc:title":["Blast diagnostic tools and techniques: a review"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Mechanical Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z"}