{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/93013"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/93013","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"In the company of citizens: the rhetoric of Singapore Inc.","abstract":"\"The leaders of Singapore take great pride in the small republic's economic achievements. Given its economic success, prominence in international markets, and cultivation of the world's highest density of millionaires, it is unsurprising that the nation is often referred to as \"\"Singapore Inc.,\"\" a metaphor depicting the country as a corporate enterprise. But what happens to the relationship between people and their government when citizens are cast as shareholders and employees, and the government the nation's expert managers? How do these groups talk to each other and what kinds of arguments do they use to negotiate public problems? In this dissertation, I address these questions by exploring the implications of a corporate constitution of the nation for public deliberation. In asking what it means to run a country like a company, I engage with the concept of neoliberalism: the \"\"leakage\"\" of economic rationalities into non-economic spheres. This dissertation is thus a project in examining how neoliberalism affects the conditions of political participation by transforming a political relationship between citizens and their government into an economic one between workers and CEOs. Through an analysis of the annual National Day Rally address delivered by Singapore's Prime Ministers from 1960 to 2014 and two public controversies over immigration and censorship, I show how the government borrows the logic and language of the business world to set the terms of public discourse and how the people respond in ways that alternately resist and reinforce these norms. I conclude that rhetorical scholarship can benefit by drawing on concepts from organizational communication and that Singapore presents a unique case of neoliberalism that blends the liberal focus on individual endeavor with republican notions of sacrifice for a common goal.\"","abstract_html":""The leaders of Singapore take great pride in the small republic's economic achievements. Given its economic success, prominence in international markets, and cultivation of the world's highest density of millionaires, it is unsurprising that the nation is often referred to as ""Singapore Inc.,"" a metaphor depicting the country as a corporate enterprise. But what happens to the relationship between people and their government when citizens are cast as shareholders and employees, and the government the nation's expert managers? How do these groups talk to each other and what kinds of arguments do they use to negotiate public problems? In this dissertation, I address these questions by exploring the implications of a corporate constitution of the nation for public deliberation. In asking what it means to run a country like a company, I engage with the concept of neoliberalism: the ""leakage"" of economic rationalities into non-economic spheres. This dissertation is thus a project in examining how neoliberalism affects the conditions of political participation by transforming a political relationship between citizens and their government into an economic one between workers and CEOs. Through an analysis of the annual National Day Rally address delivered by Singapore's Prime Ministers from 1960 to 2014 and two public controversies over immigration and censorship, I show how the government borrows the logic and language of the business world to set the terms of public discourse and how the people respond in ways that alternately resist and reinforce these norms. I conclude that rhetorical scholarship can benefit by drawing on concepts from organizational communication and that Singapore presents a unique case of neoliberalism that blends the liberal focus on individual endeavor with republican notions of sacrifice for a common goal."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Singh, Rohini Shashikiran"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Communication","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Murphy, John M.","Finnegan, Cara","Tewksbury, David","O'Gorman, Ned"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-11-10T18:39:10Z","date_published":"2016-11-10T18:39:10Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:35Z","subjects":["Neoliberalism","Deliberation","Public address","Economics","Organizational communication","Rhetoric","Singapore","Citizenship"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2016 Rohini Singh"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/93013","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Murphy, John M.","Finnegan, Cara","Tewksbury, David","O'Gorman, Ned"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Singh, Rohini Shashikiran"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-11-10T18:39:10Z","2018-11-11T10:15:40Z","2016-06-23","2016-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Communication"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Neoliberalism","Deliberation","Public address","Economics","Organizational communication","Rhetoric","Singapore","Citizenship"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2016 Rohini Singh"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/93013"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"The leaders of Singapore take great pride in the small republic's economic achievements. Given its economic success, prominence in international markets, and cultivation of the world's highest density of millionaires, it is unsurprising that the nation is often referred to as \"\"Singapore Inc.,\"\" a metaphor depicting the country as a corporate enterprise. But what happens to the relationship between people and their government when citizens are cast as shareholders and employees, and the government the nation's expert managers? How do these groups talk to each other and what kinds of arguments do they use to negotiate public problems? In this dissertation, I address these questions by exploring the implications of a corporate constitution of the nation for public deliberation. In asking what it means to run a country like a company, I engage with the concept of neoliberalism: the \"\"leakage\"\" of economic rationalities into non-economic spheres. This dissertation is thus a project in examining how neoliberalism affects the conditions of political participation by transforming a political relationship between citizens and their government into an economic one between workers and CEOs. Through an analysis of the annual National Day Rally address delivered by Singapore's Prime Ministers from 1960 to 2014 and two public controversies over immigration and censorship, I show how the government borrows the logic and language of the business world to set the terms of public discourse and how the people respond in ways that alternately resist and reinforce these norms. I conclude that rhetorical scholarship can benefit by drawing on concepts from organizational communication and that Singapore presents a unique case of neoliberalism that blends the liberal focus on individual endeavor with republican notions of sacrifice for a common goal.\"","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2018-08-01","The student, Rohini Singh, accepted the attached license on 2016-06-21 at 18:06.","The student, Rohini Singh, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2016-06-21 at 18:08.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2016-06-23 at 16:18.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9688 on 2016-11-10 at 12:24:36","Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-10T18:39:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 SINGH-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf: 1610181 bytes, checksum: f1b4643cf3e1cbf16796647d167803d4 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: 4fac5491232aa7adfcf8ae4503178b55 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-06-23","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 95435 Lift date: 2018-11-10T18:39:22Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 95435 Lift date: 2018-11-10T18:43:22Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 95435 on 2018-11-11T10:15:40Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["In the company of citizens: the rhetoric of Singapore Inc."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Murphy, John M.","Finnegan, Cara","Tewksbury, David","O'Gorman, Ned"],"dc:creator":["Singh, Rohini Shashikiran"],"dc:date":["2016-11-10T18:39:10Z","2018-11-11T10:15:40Z","2016-06-23","2016-08"],"dc:description":["\"The leaders of Singapore take great pride in the small republic's economic achievements. Given its economic success, prominence in international markets, and cultivation of the world's highest density of millionaires, it is unsurprising that the nation is often referred to as \"\"Singapore Inc.,\"\" a metaphor depicting the country as a corporate enterprise. But what happens to the relationship between people and their government when citizens are cast as shareholders and employees, and the government the nation's expert managers? How do these groups talk to each other and what kinds of arguments do they use to negotiate public problems? In this dissertation, I address these questions by exploring the implications of a corporate constitution of the nation for public deliberation. In asking what it means to run a country like a company, I engage with the concept of neoliberalism: the \"\"leakage\"\" of economic rationalities into non-economic spheres. This dissertation is thus a project in examining how neoliberalism affects the conditions of political participation by transforming a political relationship between citizens and their government into an economic one between workers and CEOs. Through an analysis of the annual National Day Rally address delivered by Singapore's Prime Ministers from 1960 to 2014 and two public controversies over immigration and censorship, I show how the government borrows the logic and language of the business world to set the terms of public discourse and how the people respond in ways that alternately resist and reinforce these norms. I conclude that rhetorical scholarship can benefit by drawing on concepts from organizational communication and that Singapore presents a unique case of neoliberalism that blends the liberal focus on individual endeavor with republican notions of sacrifice for a common goal.\"","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2018-08-01","The student, Rohini Singh, accepted the attached license on 2016-06-21 at 18:06.","The student, Rohini Singh, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2016-06-21 at 18:08.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2016-06-23 at 16:18.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9688 on 2016-11-10 at 12:24:36","Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-10T18:39:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 SINGH-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf: 1610181 bytes, checksum: f1b4643cf3e1cbf16796647d167803d4 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: 4fac5491232aa7adfcf8ae4503178b55 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-06-23","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 95435 Lift date: 2018-11-10T18:39:22Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 95435 Lift date: 2018-11-10T18:43:22Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 95435 on 2018-11-11T10:15:40Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/93013"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2016 Rohini Singh"],"dc:subject":["Neoliberalism","Deliberation","Public address","Economics","Organizational communication","Rhetoric","Singapore","Citizenship"],"dc:title":["In the company of citizens: the rhetoric of Singapore Inc."],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Communication"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:35Z"}