{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/92998"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/92998","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Text and visual annotation tools for scalable design feedback","abstract":"Designers who wish to solicit feedback online have access to a variety of tools. Yet when selecting one tool over another for feedback collection, there is little empirical evidence to guide a designer's decision. We conducted an online study (N=360) where participants provided design feedback using two representative classes of feedback collection interfaces: spatial and nonspatial. For each interface, we also manipulated access to history feedback. Our results showed that the presence of history introduced a fixation effect where providers entered feedback that was more similar to the feedback they reviewed. Providers in the non-spatial condition entered feedback that was 24% longer than the spatial condition; whereas providers in the spatial condition left more investigation feedback. There was no difference in specificity between conditions. Results suggest that the more important choice designers must make is not the class of tool they use but whether history feedback is included.","abstract_html":"Designers who wish to solicit feedback online have access to a variety of tools. Yet when selecting one tool over another for feedback collection, there is little empirical evidence to guide a designer's decision. We conducted an online study (N=360) where participants provided design feedback using two representative classes of feedback collection interfaces: spatial and nonspatial. For each interface, we also manipulated access to history feedback. Our results showed that the presence of history introduced a fixation effect where providers entered feedback that was more similar to the feedback they reviewed. Providers in the non-spatial condition entered feedback that was 24% longer than the spatial condition; whereas providers in the spatial condition left more investigation feedback. There was no difference in specificity between conditions. Results suggest that the more important choice designers must make is not the class of tool they use but whether history feedback is included.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mangutov, Kirill"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Computer Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bailey, Brian P."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-11-10T18:39:03Z","date_published":"2016-11-10T18:39:03Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:35Z","subjects":["Crowdsourcing","Design","Feedback","Creativity"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2016 Kirill Mangutov"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/92998","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bailey, Brian P."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mangutov, Kirill"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-11-10T18:39:03Z","2018-11-11T10:15:19Z","2016-06-13","2016-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Computer Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Crowdsourcing","Design","Feedback","Creativity"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2016 Kirill Mangutov"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/92998"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Designers who wish to solicit feedback online have access to a variety of tools. Yet when selecting one tool over another for feedback collection, there is little empirical evidence to guide a designer's decision. We conducted an online study (N=360) where participants provided design feedback using two representative classes of feedback collection interfaces: spatial and nonspatial. For each interface, we also manipulated access to history feedback. Our results showed that the presence of history introduced a fixation effect where providers entered feedback that was more similar to the feedback they reviewed. Providers in the non-spatial condition entered feedback that was 24% longer than the spatial condition; whereas providers in the spatial condition left more investigation feedback. There was no difference in specificity between conditions. Results suggest that the more important choice designers must make is not the class of tool they use but whether history feedback is included.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2018-08-01","The student, Kirill Mangutov, accepted the attached license on 2016-06-02 at 13:24.","The student, Kirill Mangutov, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2016-06-02 at 13:28.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2016-06-13 at 11:17.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9641 on 2016-11-10 at 12:24:20","Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-10T18:39:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 MANGUTOV-THESIS-2016.pdf: 3875278 bytes, checksum: 8120a9c67df7e7d54e57f876b8582070 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 448e02533d0f033c71851b08a0a723b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-06-13","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 95420 Lift date: 2018-11-10T18:39:22Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 95420 Lift date: 2018-11-10T18:43:22Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 95420 on 2018-11-11T10:15:19Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Text and visual annotation tools for scalable design feedback"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bailey, Brian P."],"dc:creator":["Mangutov, Kirill"],"dc:date":["2016-11-10T18:39:03Z","2018-11-11T10:15:19Z","2016-06-13","2016-08"],"dc:description":["Designers who wish to solicit feedback online have access to a variety of tools. Yet when selecting one tool over another for feedback collection, there is little empirical evidence to guide a designer's decision. We conducted an online study (N=360) where participants provided design feedback using two representative classes of feedback collection interfaces: spatial and nonspatial. For each interface, we also manipulated access to history feedback. Our results showed that the presence of history introduced a fixation effect where providers entered feedback that was more similar to the feedback they reviewed. Providers in the non-spatial condition entered feedback that was 24% longer than the spatial condition; whereas providers in the spatial condition left more investigation feedback. There was no difference in specificity between conditions. Results suggest that the more important choice designers must make is not the class of tool they use but whether history feedback is included.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2018-08-01","The student, Kirill Mangutov, accepted the attached license on 2016-06-02 at 13:24.","The student, Kirill Mangutov, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2016-06-02 at 13:28.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2016-06-13 at 11:17.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9641 on 2016-11-10 at 12:24:20","Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-10T18:39:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 MANGUTOV-THESIS-2016.pdf: 3875278 bytes, checksum: 8120a9c67df7e7d54e57f876b8582070 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 448e02533d0f033c71851b08a0a723b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-06-13","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 95420 Lift date: 2018-11-10T18:39:22Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 95420 Lift date: 2018-11-10T18:43:22Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 95420 on 2018-11-11T10:15:19Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/92998"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2016 Kirill Mangutov"],"dc:subject":["Crowdsourcing","Design","Feedback","Creativity"],"dc:title":["Text and visual annotation tools for scalable design feedback"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Computer Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:35Z"}