{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90726"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90726","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Methodological issues in epistemology and moral psychology","abstract":"Between 1960 and 1999, it was quite common for philosophers to rely almost completely on a priori methods to advance their arguments (Knobe, 2015); in a recent study by Knobe, the majority of papers sampled from this period used strictly a priori methods. In contrast, in the last decade and a half, many philosophers' strategy for making progress on philosophical questions has changed. Philosophers are now relying more heavily on empirical data—including running their own observational and experimental studies—in order to support their arguments. Without a doubt, part of this shift was due to the rise of experimental philosophy – roughly a methodological approach to addressing philosophical questions wherein the researcher uses psychological methods to investigate the parameters that affect the deployment of philosophically significant concepts. This dissertation raises methodological problems with work in experimental philosophy and then proposes solutions to these problems. My focus in this dissertation is on two subfields in philosophy – epistemology and moral psychology – both of which have witnessed increased uses of psychological methods to investigate philosophical questions.","abstract_html":"Between 1960 and 1999, it was quite common for philosophers to rely almost completely on a priori methods to advance their arguments (Knobe, 2015); in a recent study by Knobe, the majority of papers sampled from this period used strictly a priori methods. In contrast, in the last decade and a half, many philosophers' strategy for making progress on philosophical questions has changed. Philosophers are now relying more heavily on empirical data—including running their own observational and experimental studies—in order to support their arguments. Without a doubt, part of this shift was due to the rise of experimental philosophy – roughly a methodological approach to addressing philosophical questions wherein the researcher uses psychological methods to investigate the parameters that affect the deployment of philosophically significant concepts. This dissertation raises methodological problems with work in experimental philosophy and then proposes solutions to these problems. My focus in this dissertation is on two subfields in philosophy – epistemology and moral psychology – both of which have witnessed increased uses of psychological methods to investigate philosophical questions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Horne, Zachary S"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Philosophy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Waskan, Jonathan","Hummel, John","Livengood, Jonathan","Korman, Daniel"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-07-07T20:26:58Z","date_published":"2016-07-07T20:26:58Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:34Z","subjects":["Philosophy","Cognitive Science","Epistemology"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2016 Zachary Horne"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90726","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Waskan, Jonathan","Hummel, John","Livengood, Jonathan","Korman, Daniel"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Horne, Zachary S"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-07-07T20:26:58Z","2018-07-08T09:15:20Z","2016-03-16","2016-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Philosophy","Cognitive Science","Epistemology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2016 Zachary Horne"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90726"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Between 1960 and 1999, it was quite common for philosophers to rely almost completely on a priori methods to advance their arguments (Knobe, 2015); in a recent study by Knobe, the majority of papers sampled from this period used strictly a priori methods. In contrast, in the last decade and a half, many philosophers' strategy for making progress on philosophical questions has changed. Philosophers are now relying more heavily on empirical data—including running their own observational and experimental studies—in order to support their arguments. Without a doubt, part of this shift was due to the rise of experimental philosophy – roughly a methodological approach to addressing philosophical questions wherein the researcher uses psychological methods to investigate the parameters that affect the deployment of philosophically significant concepts. This dissertation raises methodological problems with work in experimental philosophy and then proposes solutions to these problems. My focus in this dissertation is on two subfields in philosophy – epistemology and moral psychology – both of which have witnessed increased uses of psychological methods to investigate philosophical questions.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2018-05-01","The student, Zachary Horne, accepted the attached license on 2016-03-15 at 22:45.","The student, Zachary Horne, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2016-03-15 at 22:49.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2016-03-16 at 13:09.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9107 on 2016-07-07 at 13:48:35","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T20:26:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 HORNE-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf: 1698048 bytes, checksum: 7c5dfcc11b2c48432793f810d7315486 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 0e6b408f665ee3303820fa65caee1f70 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4556 bytes, checksum: c9265e2457f4803ee83cd5f1b3da2603 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-16","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 93078 Lift date: 2018-07-07T20:28:14Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 93078 Lift date: 2018-07-07T20:35:34Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 93078 on 2018-07-08T09:15:20Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Methodological issues in epistemology and moral psychology"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Waskan, Jonathan","Hummel, John","Livengood, Jonathan","Korman, Daniel"],"dc:creator":["Horne, Zachary S"],"dc:date":["2016-07-07T20:26:58Z","2018-07-08T09:15:20Z","2016-03-16","2016-05"],"dc:description":["Between 1960 and 1999, it was quite common for philosophers to rely almost completely on a priori methods to advance their arguments (Knobe, 2015); in a recent study by Knobe, the majority of papers sampled from this period used strictly a priori methods. In contrast, in the last decade and a half, many philosophers' strategy for making progress on philosophical questions has changed. Philosophers are now relying more heavily on empirical data—including running their own observational and experimental studies—in order to support their arguments. Without a doubt, part of this shift was due to the rise of experimental philosophy – roughly a methodological approach to addressing philosophical questions wherein the researcher uses psychological methods to investigate the parameters that affect the deployment of philosophically significant concepts. This dissertation raises methodological problems with work in experimental philosophy and then proposes solutions to these problems. My focus in this dissertation is on two subfields in philosophy – epistemology and moral psychology – both of which have witnessed increased uses of psychological methods to investigate philosophical questions.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2018-05-01","The student, Zachary Horne, accepted the attached license on 2016-03-15 at 22:45.","The student, Zachary Horne, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2016-03-15 at 22:49.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2016-03-16 at 13:09.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9107 on 2016-07-07 at 13:48:35","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T20:26:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 HORNE-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf: 1698048 bytes, checksum: 7c5dfcc11b2c48432793f810d7315486 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 0e6b408f665ee3303820fa65caee1f70 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4556 bytes, checksum: c9265e2457f4803ee83cd5f1b3da2603 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-16","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 93078 Lift date: 2018-07-07T20:28:14Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 93078 Lift date: 2018-07-07T20:35:34Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 93078 on 2018-07-08T09:15:20Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90726"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2016 Zachary Horne"],"dc:subject":["Philosophy","Cognitive Science","Epistemology"],"dc:title":["Methodological issues in epistemology and moral psychology"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Philosophy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:34Z"}