{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90653"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90653","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"All it takes is a nudge: pushing environmental federalism to tackle the massive non-point source pollution problem","abstract":"Controlling the massive problem of excess nutrient pollution in America's most prominent waters through the Clean Water Act continues to challenge administrators both on the ground and in the courts. Widespread hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, impaired waterways in Florida, and a declining fishing industry in the Chesapeake Bay illustrate continuing failures to remedy existing degradation and prevent future harm. The Act's structure of cooperative federalism places primacy with the states to handle the runoff, yet inaction by the states and the absence of a clear solution has prompted lawsuits by environmental groups seeking stringent intervention and lobbying groups vowing to protect their agricultural industry from increased regulation. Traditional courses of action within the cooperative federalism framework need to expand and accommodate the massive problem instead of remaining legally and scientifically static. Nudging, made popular in recent literature, could be the key policy tool to drive this expansion because it induces improvement through systems that preserve a person's liberty, alleviating constitutional concerns over land use. The water quality standard setting process provides new mediums in which to nudge, but when programs and policies intended to nudge turn into a shove, the judiciary plays an important role in preserving the balance. Contrasting approaches in each watershed provide insight to crafting policies that shift towards balanced and effective nutrient pollution controls before additional legislation is imposed.","abstract_html":"Controlling the massive problem of excess nutrient pollution in America's most prominent waters through the Clean Water Act continues to challenge administrators both on the ground and in the courts. Widespread hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, impaired waterways in Florida, and a declining fishing industry in the Chesapeake Bay illustrate continuing failures to remedy existing degradation and prevent future harm. The Act's structure of cooperative federalism places primacy with the states to handle the runoff, yet inaction by the states and the absence of a clear solution has prompted lawsuits by environmental groups seeking stringent intervention and lobbying groups vowing to protect their agricultural industry from increased regulation. Traditional courses of action within the cooperative federalism framework need to expand and accommodate the massive problem instead of remaining legally and scientifically static. Nudging, made popular in recent literature, could be the key policy tool to drive this expansion because it induces improvement through systems that preserve a person's liberty, alleviating constitutional concerns over land use. The water quality standard setting process provides new mediums in which to nudge, but when programs and policies intended to nudge turn into a shove, the judiciary plays an important role in preserving the balance. Contrasting approaches in each watershed provide insight to crafting policies that shift towards balanced and effective nutrient pollution controls before additional legislation is imposed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Walker, Matthew Arthur"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Natural Res & Env Sciences","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Endres, Bryan"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-07-07T19:58:04Z","date_published":"2016-07-07T19:58:04Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:34Z","subjects":["Clean Water Act","Cooperative federalism","Nudge","Massive problems","Nutrient pollution","Hypoxia","Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2016 Matthew Walker"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90653","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Endres, Bryan"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Walker, Matthew Arthur"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-07-07T19:58:04Z","2016-04-26","2016-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Natural Res & Env Sciences"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Clean Water Act","Cooperative federalism","Nudge","Massive problems","Nutrient pollution","Hypoxia","Nitrogen","Phosphorus"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2016 Matthew Walker"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90653"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Controlling the massive problem of excess nutrient pollution in America's most prominent waters through the Clean Water Act continues to challenge administrators both on the ground and in the courts. Widespread hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, impaired waterways in Florida, and a declining fishing industry in the Chesapeake Bay illustrate continuing failures to remedy existing degradation and prevent future harm. The Act's structure of cooperative federalism places primacy with the states to handle the runoff, yet inaction by the states and the absence of a clear solution has prompted lawsuits by environmental groups seeking stringent intervention and lobbying groups vowing to protect their agricultural industry from increased regulation. Traditional courses of action within the cooperative federalism framework need to expand and accommodate the massive problem instead of remaining legally and scientifically static. Nudging, made popular in recent literature, could be the key policy tool to drive this expansion because it induces improvement through systems that preserve a person's liberty, alleviating constitutional concerns over land use. The water quality standard setting process provides new mediums in which to nudge, but when programs and policies intended to nudge turn into a shove, the judiciary plays an important role in preserving the balance. Contrasting approaches in each watershed provide insight to crafting policies that shift towards balanced and effective nutrient pollution controls before additional legislation is imposed.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Matthew Walker, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-26 at 09:25.","The student, Matthew Walker, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2016-04-26 at 09:30.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2016-04-26 at 14:30.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9495 on 2016-07-07 at 13:33:15","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:58:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 WALKER-THESIS-2016.pdf: 619669 bytes, checksum: ef678c5dba94972a406a5d45bf114b6f (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 245361c4d863e18a39e41127d10be91a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-26"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["All it takes is a nudge: pushing environmental federalism to tackle the massive non-point source pollution problem"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Endres, Bryan"],"dc:creator":["Walker, Matthew Arthur"],"dc:date":["2016-07-07T19:58:04Z","2016-04-26","2016-05"],"dc:description":["Controlling the massive problem of excess nutrient pollution in America's most prominent waters through the Clean Water Act continues to challenge administrators both on the ground and in the courts. Widespread hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, impaired waterways in Florida, and a declining fishing industry in the Chesapeake Bay illustrate continuing failures to remedy existing degradation and prevent future harm. The Act's structure of cooperative federalism places primacy with the states to handle the runoff, yet inaction by the states and the absence of a clear solution has prompted lawsuits by environmental groups seeking stringent intervention and lobbying groups vowing to protect their agricultural industry from increased regulation. Traditional courses of action within the cooperative federalism framework need to expand and accommodate the massive problem instead of remaining legally and scientifically static. Nudging, made popular in recent literature, could be the key policy tool to drive this expansion because it induces improvement through systems that preserve a person's liberty, alleviating constitutional concerns over land use. The water quality standard setting process provides new mediums in which to nudge, but when programs and policies intended to nudge turn into a shove, the judiciary plays an important role in preserving the balance. Contrasting approaches in each watershed provide insight to crafting policies that shift towards balanced and effective nutrient pollution controls before additional legislation is imposed.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Matthew Walker, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-26 at 09:25.","The student, Matthew Walker, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2016-04-26 at 09:30.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2016-04-26 at 14:30.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9495 on 2016-07-07 at 13:33:15","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:58:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 WALKER-THESIS-2016.pdf: 619669 bytes, checksum: ef678c5dba94972a406a5d45bf114b6f (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4211 bytes, checksum: 245361c4d863e18a39e41127d10be91a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-26"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90653"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2016 Matthew Walker"],"dc:subject":["Clean Water Act","Cooperative federalism","Nudge","Massive problems","Nutrient pollution","Hypoxia","Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"dc:title":["All it takes is a nudge: pushing environmental federalism to tackle the massive non-point source pollution problem"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Natural Res & Env Sciences"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:34Z"}