{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90642"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90642","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Comparison of stopped delay between field measurements and HCM 2010 estimations at actuated signalized intersections","abstract":"The Highway Capacity Manual 2010 methodology of capacity analysis is widely used for performance evaluation of signalized intersections. However, very few studies have been performed to validate the HCM delay estimation model. This thesis aims to study the accuracy of the HCM 2010 delay estimation methodology for actuated signalized intersections using field data. The HCM stopped delay estimates were statistically compared with the field measurements for six signalized intersections along an actuated-coordinated corridor during four time periods of day, namely AM peak, off peak, noon peak, and PM peak. Overall, the HCM estimates were not significantly different from the field data only for 38.1% of the comparisons (32 cases out of 84). In the significant discrepancies, 74.2% of the HCM overestimations were on the minor streets (23 cases out of 31) and 95.2% of the underestimations were on the major street (20 cases out of 21). Hence, HCM significantly overestimated the delay on minor streets most of the time and significantly underestimated on major streets almost all the time. The over- and underestimation trend was verified for each intersection as well as each time period. In light of this trend, some insight is provided into the causes of observed discrepancies and recommendations are made for future studies.","abstract_html":"The Highway Capacity Manual 2010 methodology of capacity analysis is widely used for performance evaluation of signalized intersections. However, very few studies have been performed to validate the HCM delay estimation model. This thesis aims to study the accuracy of the HCM 2010 delay estimation methodology for actuated signalized intersections using field data. The HCM stopped delay estimates were statistically compared with the field measurements for six signalized intersections along an actuated-coordinated corridor during four time periods of day, namely AM peak, off peak, noon peak, and PM peak. Overall, the HCM estimates were not significantly different from the field data only for 38.1% of the comparisons (32 cases out of 84). In the significant discrepancies, 74.2% of the HCM overestimations were on the minor streets (23 cases out of 31) and 95.2% of the underestimations were on the major street (20 cases out of 21). Hence, HCM significantly overestimated the delay on minor streets most of the time and significantly underestimated on major streets almost all the time. The over- and underestimation trend was verified for each intersection as well as each time period. In light of this trend, some insight is provided into the causes of observed discrepancies and recommendations are made for future studies.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Shaik, Mohammed Abdul Rawoof"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Civil Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Benekohal, Rahim"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-07-07T19:57:58Z","date_published":"2016-07-07T19:57:58Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:34Z","subjects":["Field Data Collection","Data Reduction","Highway capacity manual (HCM)","Capacity Analysis","Delay Comparison","Actuated Signals"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2016 Mohammed Abdul Rawoof Shaik"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90642","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Benekohal, Rahim"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Shaik, Mohammed Abdul Rawoof"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-07-07T19:57:58Z","2016-04-26","2016-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Civil Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Field Data Collection","Data Reduction","Highway capacity manual (HCM)","Capacity Analysis","Delay Comparison","Actuated Signals"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2016 Mohammed Abdul Rawoof Shaik"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90642"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The Highway Capacity Manual 2010 methodology of capacity analysis is widely used for performance evaluation of signalized intersections. However, very few studies have been performed to validate the HCM delay estimation model. This thesis aims to study the accuracy of the HCM 2010 delay estimation methodology for actuated signalized intersections using field data. The HCM stopped delay estimates were statistically compared with the field measurements for six signalized intersections along an actuated-coordinated corridor during four time periods of day, namely AM peak, off peak, noon peak, and PM peak. Overall, the HCM estimates were not significantly different from the field data only for 38.1% of the comparisons (32 cases out of 84). In the significant discrepancies, 74.2% of the HCM overestimations were on the minor streets (23 cases out of 31) and 95.2% of the underestimations were on the major street (20 cases out of 21). Hence, HCM significantly overestimated the delay on minor streets most of the time and significantly underestimated on major streets almost all the time. The over- and underestimation trend was verified for each intersection as well as each time period. In light of this trend, some insight is provided into the causes of observed discrepancies and recommendations are made for future studies.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Mohammed Abdul Rawoof Shaik, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-25 at 12:01.","The student, Mohammed Abdul Rawoof Shaik, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2016-04-25 at 12:14.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2016-04-26 at 08:03.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9468 on 2016-07-07 at 13:32:57","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:57:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 SHAIK-THESIS-2016.pdf: 1646648 bytes, checksum: 73d78a0af172b1d5618359c8cb405a5c (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4224 bytes, checksum: e86749fda4323b0f6c7aedf68cd05994 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-26"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Comparison of stopped delay between field measurements and HCM 2010 estimations at actuated signalized intersections"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Benekohal, Rahim"],"dc:creator":["Shaik, Mohammed Abdul Rawoof"],"dc:date":["2016-07-07T19:57:58Z","2016-04-26","2016-05"],"dc:description":["The Highway Capacity Manual 2010 methodology of capacity analysis is widely used for performance evaluation of signalized intersections. However, very few studies have been performed to validate the HCM delay estimation model. This thesis aims to study the accuracy of the HCM 2010 delay estimation methodology for actuated signalized intersections using field data. The HCM stopped delay estimates were statistically compared with the field measurements for six signalized intersections along an actuated-coordinated corridor during four time periods of day, namely AM peak, off peak, noon peak, and PM peak. Overall, the HCM estimates were not significantly different from the field data only for 38.1% of the comparisons (32 cases out of 84). In the significant discrepancies, 74.2% of the HCM overestimations were on the minor streets (23 cases out of 31) and 95.2% of the underestimations were on the major street (20 cases out of 21). Hence, HCM significantly overestimated the delay on minor streets most of the time and significantly underestimated on major streets almost all the time. The over- and underestimation trend was verified for each intersection as well as each time period. In light of this trend, some insight is provided into the causes of observed discrepancies and recommendations are made for future studies.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Mohammed Abdul Rawoof Shaik, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-25 at 12:01.","The student, Mohammed Abdul Rawoof Shaik, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2016-04-25 at 12:14.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2016-04-26 at 08:03.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9468 on 2016-07-07 at 13:32:57","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:57:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 SHAIK-THESIS-2016.pdf: 1646648 bytes, checksum: 73d78a0af172b1d5618359c8cb405a5c (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4224 bytes, checksum: e86749fda4323b0f6c7aedf68cd05994 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-26"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90642"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2016 Mohammed Abdul Rawoof Shaik"],"dc:subject":["Field Data Collection","Data Reduction","Highway capacity manual (HCM)","Capacity Analysis","Delay Comparison","Actuated Signals"],"dc:title":["Comparison of stopped delay between field measurements and HCM 2010 estimations at actuated signalized intersections"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Civil Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:34Z"}