{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90621"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90621","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"A slap in the face of public taste: the Russian Futurists' aesthetics of revolution","abstract":"This thesis examines the historical context in which Russian Futurism formed in 1910 in order to comprehend better this significant movement’s motivations, ideologies, aesthetics, and effects on subsequent literature, art, and politics, particularly those of Russia. It identifies the primary problems of the late Russian Empire and how various groups sought to provide solutions to these troubles to help Russia become modern. While scholars often focus on the Bolsheviks’ proposal of a two-fold socio-political revolution because this view prevailed in and after 1917, other organizations promoted their own interpretations of how to address Russia’s numerous troubles that offer insight into the era and the diversity of opinions that existed during this turbulent period. This project focuses on the most well-known group of Russian Futurists, Hylaea (sometimes also called the Cubo-Futurists), because its members developed unconventional aesthetics of revolution to spread their plan to the Russian public from the time of its founding in 1910 until the outbreak of the Great War in 1914. The Hylaean Futurists' proposal expanded upon and differed from the Bolsheviks' vision of revolution because it called for a three-tiered revolution that would encompass aesthetics in addition to politics and society. By deliberately infusing their iconoclastic aesthetics of revolution into their writings, books, and performances, the Hylaeans slapped ambivalent and complacent Russians awake to the shameful conditions that existed in the empire's antiquated political, social, and artistic systems. This thesis includes a number of detailed case studies of the Hylaean Futurists' pre-war publications, rhetoric, illustrations, and performances in order to understand more comprehensively their inspiration, aesthetics, techniques, interpretation of revolution, and relationship with the socialists before the momentous revolutions of 1917.","abstract_html":"This thesis examines the historical context in which Russian Futurism formed in 1910 in order to comprehend better this significant movement’s motivations, ideologies, aesthetics, and effects on subsequent literature, art, and politics, particularly those of Russia. It identifies the primary problems of the late Russian Empire and how various groups sought to provide solutions to these troubles to help Russia become modern. While scholars often focus on the Bolsheviks’ proposal of a two-fold socio-political revolution because this view prevailed in and after 1917, other organizations promoted their own interpretations of how to address Russia’s numerous troubles that offer insight into the era and the diversity of opinions that existed during this turbulent period. This project focuses on the most well-known group of Russian Futurists, Hylaea (sometimes also called the Cubo-Futurists), because its members developed unconventional aesthetics of revolution to spread their plan to the Russian public from the time of its founding in 1910 until the outbreak of the Great War in 1914. The Hylaean Futurists&#x27; proposal expanded upon and differed from the Bolsheviks&#x27; vision of revolution because it called for a three-tiered revolution that would encompass aesthetics in addition to politics and society. By deliberately infusing their iconoclastic aesthetics of revolution into their writings, books, and performances, the Hylaeans slapped ambivalent and complacent Russians awake to the shameful conditions that existed in the empire&#x27;s antiquated political, social, and artistic systems. This thesis includes a number of detailed case studies of the Hylaean Futurists&#x27; pre-war publications, rhetoric, illustrations, and performances in order to understand more comprehensively their inspiration, aesthetics, techniques, interpretation of revolution, and relationship with the socialists before the momentous revolutions of 1917.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lipira, Emily K"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Russian, E Eur, Eurasian St","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Steinberg, Mark D.","Cooper, David"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-07-07T19:57:41Z","date_published":"2016-07-07T19:57:41Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:34Z","subjects":["Russian Futurism","Futurists","Hylaea","Cubo-Futurism","Cubo-Futurists","Vladimir Maiakovskii","Vladimir Mayakovsky","David Burliuk","Khruchenykh","Khlebnikov","Slap in the Face of Public Taste","Modernity","Late Imperial Russia","Revolution","Aesthetics"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2016 Emily Lipira"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90621","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Steinberg, Mark D.","Cooper, David"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lipira, Emily K"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-07-07T19:57:41Z","2016-04-22","2016-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Russian, E Eur, Eurasian St"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Russian Futurism","Futurists","Hylaea","Cubo-Futurism","Cubo-Futurists","Vladimir Maiakovskii","Vladimir Mayakovsky","David Burliuk","Khruchenykh","Khlebnikov","Slap in the Face of Public Taste","Modernity","Late Imperial Russia","Revolution","Aesthetics"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2016 Emily Lipira"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90621"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis examines the historical context in which Russian Futurism formed in 1910 in order to comprehend better this significant movement’s motivations, ideologies, aesthetics, and effects on subsequent literature, art, and politics, particularly those of Russia. It identifies the primary problems of the late Russian Empire and how various groups sought to provide solutions to these troubles to help Russia become modern. While scholars often focus on the Bolsheviks’ proposal of a two-fold socio-political revolution because this view prevailed in and after 1917, other organizations promoted their own interpretations of how to address Russia’s numerous troubles that offer insight into the era and the diversity of opinions that existed during this turbulent period. This project focuses on the most well-known group of Russian Futurists, Hylaea (sometimes also called the Cubo-Futurists), because its members developed unconventional aesthetics of revolution to spread their plan to the Russian public from the time of its founding in 1910 until the outbreak of the Great War in 1914. The Hylaean Futurists' proposal expanded upon and differed from the Bolsheviks' vision of revolution because it called for a three-tiered revolution that would encompass aesthetics in addition to politics and society. By deliberately infusing their iconoclastic aesthetics of revolution into their writings, books, and performances, the Hylaeans slapped ambivalent and complacent Russians awake to the shameful conditions that existed in the empire's antiquated political, social, and artistic systems. This thesis includes a number of detailed case studies of the Hylaean Futurists' pre-war publications, rhetoric, illustrations, and performances in order to understand more comprehensively their inspiration, aesthetics, techniques, interpretation of revolution, and relationship with the socialists before the momentous revolutions of 1917.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Emily Lipira, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-22 at 00:32.","The student, Emily Lipira, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2016-04-22 at 00:47.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2016-04-22 at 09:50.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9427 on 2016-07-07 at 13:32:25","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:57:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 LIPIRA-THESIS-2016.pdf: 17806762 bytes, checksum: 43bfb88fe07e32de11ad069efde00b20 (MD5) EmilyKLipiraMastersThesis.docx: 14526543 bytes, checksum: fbb4c721af382a80e449bc02362ead66 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: b4de674f4d24ec7abf760ffe3c07d285 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-22"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A slap in the face of public taste: the Russian Futurists' aesthetics of revolution"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Steinberg, Mark D.","Cooper, David"],"dc:creator":["Lipira, Emily K"],"dc:date":["2016-07-07T19:57:41Z","2016-04-22","2016-05"],"dc:description":["This thesis examines the historical context in which Russian Futurism formed in 1910 in order to comprehend better this significant movement’s motivations, ideologies, aesthetics, and effects on subsequent literature, art, and politics, particularly those of Russia. It identifies the primary problems of the late Russian Empire and how various groups sought to provide solutions to these troubles to help Russia become modern. While scholars often focus on the Bolsheviks’ proposal of a two-fold socio-political revolution because this view prevailed in and after 1917, other organizations promoted their own interpretations of how to address Russia’s numerous troubles that offer insight into the era and the diversity of opinions that existed during this turbulent period. This project focuses on the most well-known group of Russian Futurists, Hylaea (sometimes also called the Cubo-Futurists), because its members developed unconventional aesthetics of revolution to spread their plan to the Russian public from the time of its founding in 1910 until the outbreak of the Great War in 1914. The Hylaean Futurists' proposal expanded upon and differed from the Bolsheviks' vision of revolution because it called for a three-tiered revolution that would encompass aesthetics in addition to politics and society. By deliberately infusing their iconoclastic aesthetics of revolution into their writings, books, and performances, the Hylaeans slapped ambivalent and complacent Russians awake to the shameful conditions that existed in the empire's antiquated political, social, and artistic systems. This thesis includes a number of detailed case studies of the Hylaean Futurists' pre-war publications, rhetoric, illustrations, and performances in order to understand more comprehensively their inspiration, aesthetics, techniques, interpretation of revolution, and relationship with the socialists before the momentous revolutions of 1917.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Emily Lipira, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-22 at 00:32.","The student, Emily Lipira, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2016-04-22 at 00:47.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2016-04-22 at 09:50.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9427 on 2016-07-07 at 13:32:25","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:57:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 LIPIRA-THESIS-2016.pdf: 17806762 bytes, checksum: 43bfb88fe07e32de11ad069efde00b20 (MD5) EmilyKLipiraMastersThesis.docx: 14526543 bytes, checksum: fbb4c721af382a80e449bc02362ead66 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4209 bytes, checksum: b4de674f4d24ec7abf760ffe3c07d285 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-22"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90621"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2016 Emily Lipira"],"dc:subject":["Russian Futurism","Futurists","Hylaea","Cubo-Futurism","Cubo-Futurists","Vladimir Maiakovskii","Vladimir Mayakovsky","David Burliuk","Khruchenykh","Khlebnikov","Slap in the Face of Public Taste","Modernity","Late Imperial Russia","Revolution","Aesthetics"],"dc:title":["A slap in the face of public taste: the Russian Futurists' aesthetics of revolution"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Russian, E Eur, Eurasian St"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:34Z"}