{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90506"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/90506","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The gooey, the bloody, and just plain gross: exploring art and visual culture with an abject visual methodology","abstract":"This doctoral study concerns itself with the diverse and abundant images of disgust in fine art and popular visual culture. My study is ground in a deep understanding of disgust and the psychoanalytic theory of the abject as developed by Julia Kristeva and modified by later scholars like Chanter and Butler. However, these scholars do not concern themselves specifically with the arena of the visual. To address this lack, I have developed an abject visual methodology. This abject visual methodology is predicated on other methodological works, like Sandoval's Methodology of the oppressed, and it is designed specifically to elucidate the intricate intersections of material, process, subject, narrative and viewership in application to art which disgusts. I use my abject visual methodology to create a taxonomy of abject art, which provides a broad survey of the types of disgusting or psychological uncomfortable images found in the art world. This taxonomy also allows for a demonstration of my abject visual methodology as a tool of inquiry and analysis. Finally, I argue for the relevance of both abject art and an abject visual methodology in art education, a discipline that in general avoids the controversial. Abject art can lead to a fruitful and generative revolt that allows not only for personal expression but the construction of deep empathetic connections and the ability to manage critical thinking.","abstract_html":"This doctoral study concerns itself with the diverse and abundant images of disgust in fine art and popular visual culture. My study is ground in a deep understanding of disgust and the psychoanalytic theory of the abject as developed by Julia Kristeva and modified by later scholars like Chanter and Butler. However, these scholars do not concern themselves specifically with the arena of the visual. To address this lack, I have developed an abject visual methodology. This abject visual methodology is predicated on other methodological works, like Sandoval's Methodology of the oppressed, and it is designed specifically to elucidate the intricate intersections of material, process, subject, narrative and viewership in application to art which disgusts. I use my abject visual methodology to create a taxonomy of abject art, which provides a broad survey of the types of disgusting or psychological uncomfortable images found in the art world. This taxonomy also allows for a demonstration of my abject visual methodology as a tool of inquiry and analysis. Finally, I argue for the relevance of both abject art and an abject visual methodology in art education, a discipline that in general avoids the controversial. Abject art can lead to a fruitful and generative revolt that allows not only for personal expression but the construction of deep empathetic connections and the ability to manage critical thinking.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Livingston, Susan Briana"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Art Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Duncum, Paul A.","Kaplan, Brett","Hetrick, Laura","Lucero, Jorge"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-07-07T19:53:22Z","date_published":"2016-07-07T19:53:22Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:32Z","subjects":["Abject","Abjection","Abject Art","Art","Visual Culture","Psychoanalysis","Julia Kristeva","Disgust","Judith Butler","Art Education"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2016, Susan B. Livingston"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90506","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Duncum, Paul A.","Kaplan, Brett","Hetrick, Laura","Lucero, Jorge"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Livingston, Susan Briana"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-07-07T19:53:22Z","2016-04-18","2016-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Art Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Abject","Abjection","Abject Art","Art","Visual Culture","Psychoanalysis","Julia Kristeva","Disgust","Judith Butler","Art Education"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2016, Susan B. Livingston"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90506"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This doctoral study concerns itself with the diverse and abundant images of disgust in fine art and popular visual culture. My study is ground in a deep understanding of disgust and the psychoanalytic theory of the abject as developed by Julia Kristeva and modified by later scholars like Chanter and Butler. However, these scholars do not concern themselves specifically with the arena of the visual. To address this lack, I have developed an abject visual methodology. This abject visual methodology is predicated on other methodological works, like Sandoval's Methodology of the oppressed, and it is designed specifically to elucidate the intricate intersections of material, process, subject, narrative and viewership in application to art which disgusts. I use my abject visual methodology to create a taxonomy of abject art, which provides a broad survey of the types of disgusting or psychological uncomfortable images found in the art world. This taxonomy also allows for a demonstration of my abject visual methodology as a tool of inquiry and analysis. Finally, I argue for the relevance of both abject art and an abject visual methodology in art education, a discipline that in general avoids the controversial. Abject art can lead to a fruitful and generative revolt that allows not only for personal expression but the construction of deep empathetic connections and the ability to manage critical thinking.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Susan Livingston, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-05 at 14:37.","The student, Susan Livingston, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2016-04-05 at 14:42.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2016-04-18 at 12:53.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9152 on 2016-07-07 at 13:28:35","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:53:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 LIVINGSTON-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf: 34727921 bytes, checksum: ff28ddfbf3e0b868d2fb532f592ff003 (MD5) FinalDissertation.docx: 32990367 bytes, checksum: f4ace9e1b1af8e2f1c88a361303e4bc1 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: daef1dea17bc67843a0e940d3808b0f3 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4559 bytes, checksum: 4379768a99de141c484f3136d1335055 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-18"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The gooey, the bloody, and just plain gross: exploring art and visual culture with an abject visual methodology"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Duncum, Paul A.","Kaplan, Brett","Hetrick, Laura","Lucero, Jorge"],"dc:creator":["Livingston, Susan Briana"],"dc:date":["2016-07-07T19:53:22Z","2016-04-18","2016-05"],"dc:description":["This doctoral study concerns itself with the diverse and abundant images of disgust in fine art and popular visual culture. My study is ground in a deep understanding of disgust and the psychoanalytic theory of the abject as developed by Julia Kristeva and modified by later scholars like Chanter and Butler. However, these scholars do not concern themselves specifically with the arena of the visual. To address this lack, I have developed an abject visual methodology. This abject visual methodology is predicated on other methodological works, like Sandoval's Methodology of the oppressed, and it is designed specifically to elucidate the intricate intersections of material, process, subject, narrative and viewership in application to art which disgusts. I use my abject visual methodology to create a taxonomy of abject art, which provides a broad survey of the types of disgusting or psychological uncomfortable images found in the art world. This taxonomy also allows for a demonstration of my abject visual methodology as a tool of inquiry and analysis. Finally, I argue for the relevance of both abject art and an abject visual methodology in art education, a discipline that in general avoids the controversial. Abject art can lead to a fruitful and generative revolt that allows not only for personal expression but the construction of deep empathetic connections and the ability to manage critical thinking.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-07-07 without embargo terms","The student, Susan Livingston, accepted the attached license on 2016-04-05 at 14:37.","The student, Susan Livingston, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2016-04-05 at 14:42.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2016-04-18 at 12:53.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9152 on 2016-07-07 at 13:28:35","Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-07T19:53:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 LIVINGSTON-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf: 34727921 bytes, checksum: ff28ddfbf3e0b868d2fb532f592ff003 (MD5) FinalDissertation.docx: 32990367 bytes, checksum: f4ace9e1b1af8e2f1c88a361303e4bc1 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: daef1dea17bc67843a0e940d3808b0f3 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4559 bytes, checksum: 4379768a99de141c484f3136d1335055 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-18"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/90506"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2016, Susan B. Livingston"],"dc:subject":["Abject","Abjection","Abject Art","Art","Visual Culture","Psychoanalysis","Julia Kristeva","Disgust","Judith Butler","Art Education"],"dc:title":["The gooey, the bloody, and just plain gross: exploring art and visual culture with an abject visual methodology"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Art Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:32Z"}