{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/89100"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/89100","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Shape optimization of cambered airfoils using a genetic algorithm and a multipoint inverse method","abstract":"This thesis presents a process to optimize a cambered airfoil with the MATLAB genetic algorithm (GA) and a multipoint inverse method called PROFOIL. XFOIL was used to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of each airfoil. Data processing techniques and a custom penalty function were developed in order to overcome challenges in integrating these tools. The viability of this approach was assessed in three airfoil optimization studies. First, the optimizer was tuned using a parameterized study of various GA configurations for optimizing the (Cl/Cd)max for an 18% thick airfoil at the design conditions: Cm = -0.063 at Re = 6.88 * 10^6 and Cm = -0.030 at Re = 2.00 * 10^6. The first is a typical flow condition for a wind turbine at the r/R = 0.75 blade section location, and the second is identical to the requirements used in designing the Liebeck L1003. This tuned GA was used for the rest of the thesis. In the second study, the optimization of (Cl/Cd)max for an 18% thick airfoil with design Cm = -0.060 was conducted at Re = 6.00 * 10^6, which is a typical condition for general aviation aircraft. It was observed that the optimized airfoil resembles the Liebeck L1003 airfoil, which was designed with a Stratford pressure recovery distribution. In the third study, a series of Clmax optimization runs was performed for varying pitching moments at Re = 6.00 * 10^6, revealing final solutions that segregated into two types of airfoils that differ in camber. It was shown that the optimizer converged on reflexed airfoils for design coefficients of moment Cm = 0.000 through Cm = -0.050 and on aft-loaded airfoils for Cm = -0.075 through Cm = -0.200. In addition, both groupings of airfoils exhibited an increase in Clmax concomitant with increasing nose-down pitching moment. The results indicate that this approach can reproduce airfoils designed with central design philosophies using only a limited number of design inputs.","abstract_html":"This thesis presents a process to optimize a cambered airfoil with the MATLAB genetic algorithm (GA) and a multipoint inverse method called PROFOIL. XFOIL was used to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of each airfoil. Data processing techniques and a custom penalty function were developed in order to overcome challenges in integrating these tools. The viability of this approach was assessed in three airfoil optimization studies. First, the optimizer was tuned using a parameterized study of various GA configurations for optimizing the (Cl/Cd)max for an 18% thick airfoil at the design conditions: Cm = -0.063 at Re = 6.88 * 10^6 and Cm = -0.030 at Re = 2.00 * 10^6. The first is a typical flow condition for a wind turbine at the r/R = 0.75 blade section location, and the second is identical to the requirements used in designing the Liebeck L1003. This tuned GA was used for the rest of the thesis. In the second study, the optimization of (Cl/Cd)max for an 18% thick airfoil with design Cm = -0.060 was conducted at Re = 6.00 * 10^6, which is a typical condition for general aviation aircraft. It was observed that the optimized airfoil resembles the Liebeck L1003 airfoil, which was designed with a Stratford pressure recovery distribution. In the third study, a series of Clmax optimization runs was performed for varying pitching moments at Re = 6.00 * 10^6, revealing final solutions that segregated into two types of airfoils that differ in camber. It was shown that the optimizer converged on reflexed airfoils for design coefficients of moment Cm = 0.000 through Cm = -0.050 and on aft-loaded airfoils for Cm = -0.075 through Cm = -0.200. In addition, both groupings of airfoils exhibited an increase in Clmax concomitant with increasing nose-down pitching moment. The results indicate that this approach can reproduce airfoils designed with central design philosophies using only a limited number of design inputs.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Tsai, Kyle"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Aerospace Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Selig, Michael S."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2016,"date_issued":"2016-03-02T19:45:21Z","date_published":"2016-03-02T19:45:21Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:32Z","subjects":["Genetic Algorithm (GA)","Evolutionary Algorithms (EA)","airfoil shape optimization","inverse design","multipoint inverse design","PROFOIL","MATLAB","XFOIL"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2015 Kyle Tsai"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/89100","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Selig, Michael S."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Tsai, Kyle"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-03-02T19:45:21Z","2015-12-11","2015-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Aerospace Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Genetic Algorithm (GA)","Evolutionary Algorithms (EA)","airfoil shape optimization","inverse design","multipoint inverse design","PROFOIL","MATLAB","XFOIL"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2015 Kyle Tsai"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/89100"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis presents a process to optimize a cambered airfoil with the MATLAB genetic algorithm (GA) and a multipoint inverse method called PROFOIL. XFOIL was used to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of each airfoil. Data processing techniques and a custom penalty function were developed in order to overcome challenges in integrating these tools. The viability of this approach was assessed in three airfoil optimization studies. First, the optimizer was tuned using a parameterized study of various GA configurations for optimizing the (Cl/Cd)max for an 18% thick airfoil at the design conditions: Cm = -0.063 at Re = 6.88 * 10^6 and Cm = -0.030 at Re = 2.00 * 10^6. The first is a typical flow condition for a wind turbine at the r/R = 0.75 blade section location, and the second is identical to the requirements used in designing the Liebeck L1003. This tuned GA was used for the rest of the thesis. In the second study, the optimization of (Cl/Cd)max for an 18% thick airfoil with design Cm = -0.060 was conducted at Re = 6.00 * 10^6, which is a typical condition for general aviation aircraft. It was observed that the optimized airfoil resembles the Liebeck L1003 airfoil, which was designed with a Stratford pressure recovery distribution. In the third study, a series of Clmax optimization runs was performed for varying pitching moments at Re = 6.00 * 10^6, revealing final solutions that segregated into two types of airfoils that differ in camber. It was shown that the optimizer converged on reflexed airfoils for design coefficients of moment Cm = 0.000 through Cm = -0.050 and on aft-loaded airfoils for Cm = -0.075 through Cm = -0.200. In addition, both groupings of airfoils exhibited an increase in Clmax concomitant with increasing nose-down pitching moment. The results indicate that this approach can reproduce airfoils designed with central design philosophies using only a limited number of design inputs.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-03-02 without embargo terms","The student, Kyle Tsai, accepted the attached license on 2015-12-11 at 15:04.","The student, Kyle Tsai, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2015-12-11 at 15:13.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2015-12-11 at 16:56.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9015 on 2016-03-02 at 12:53:19","Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-02T19:45:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 16 TSAI-THESIS-2015.pdf: 2010890 bytes, checksum: d960d353124e17d8a13c5c0600e4f095 (MD5) abs.tex: 2039 bytes, checksum: 7c4e12eee48fe0348e04f0dbebfd3791 (MD5) ack.tex: 1650 bytes, checksum: 261b98c9e3c9138642bca7d5585b4a38 (MD5) aero_thesis.tex: 9974 bytes, checksum: e3f5a4e5d2d6cf1710afb26f3cc35620 (MD5) appendix_coordinates.tex: 113402 bytes, checksum: 01548e6a8997ec5902451fc1b108fd19 (MD5) appendix_polar.tex: 89535 bytes, checksum: 7f6fd6a399eb7e471fe522f3c74f3dc1 (MD5) appendix_profoil.tex: 7072 bytes, checksum: b81a070c5cac8944e54b8f6d2473aaa2 (MD5) background.tex: 45722 bytes, checksum: 28c45cceee956a640e5813b49fd068ae (MD5) conclusion.tex: 4611 bytes, checksum: 79c1a8b1d6f046e39270196a50102433 (MD5) introduction.tex: 13676 bytes, checksum: 023dfc77417aa57b26ed9214c04076c3 (MD5) methods.tex: 55665 bytes, checksum: a1d5abdf17286bbd173125c7b91706aa (MD5) references.bib: 11777 bytes, checksum: 32acd4739b8f122f86dac6ec0f997254 (MD5) results_study1.tex: 16403 bytes, checksum: 5071d89ade0e75810b75e59da25a8424 (MD5) results_study2.tex: 2602 bytes, checksum: 22a671904ebf9b63a08c2ca2792c8e04 (MD5) results_study3.tex: 9985 bytes, checksum: ff8e3da2794d76ccf76369018dbcdd40 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4206 bytes, checksum: 99219b24981ec4f50e3db2cf255d22f4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-11"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Shape optimization of cambered airfoils using a genetic algorithm and a multipoint inverse method"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Selig, Michael S."],"dc:creator":["Tsai, Kyle"],"dc:date":["2016-03-02T19:45:21Z","2015-12-11","2015-12"],"dc:description":["This thesis presents a process to optimize a cambered airfoil with the MATLAB genetic algorithm (GA) and a multipoint inverse method called PROFOIL. XFOIL was used to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of each airfoil. Data processing techniques and a custom penalty function were developed in order to overcome challenges in integrating these tools. The viability of this approach was assessed in three airfoil optimization studies. First, the optimizer was tuned using a parameterized study of various GA configurations for optimizing the (Cl/Cd)max for an 18% thick airfoil at the design conditions: Cm = -0.063 at Re = 6.88 * 10^6 and Cm = -0.030 at Re = 2.00 * 10^6. The first is a typical flow condition for a wind turbine at the r/R = 0.75 blade section location, and the second is identical to the requirements used in designing the Liebeck L1003. This tuned GA was used for the rest of the thesis. In the second study, the optimization of (Cl/Cd)max for an 18% thick airfoil with design Cm = -0.060 was conducted at Re = 6.00 * 10^6, which is a typical condition for general aviation aircraft. It was observed that the optimized airfoil resembles the Liebeck L1003 airfoil, which was designed with a Stratford pressure recovery distribution. In the third study, a series of Clmax optimization runs was performed for varying pitching moments at Re = 6.00 * 10^6, revealing final solutions that segregated into two types of airfoils that differ in camber. It was shown that the optimizer converged on reflexed airfoils for design coefficients of moment Cm = 0.000 through Cm = -0.050 and on aft-loaded airfoils for Cm = -0.075 through Cm = -0.200. In addition, both groupings of airfoils exhibited an increase in Clmax concomitant with increasing nose-down pitching moment. The results indicate that this approach can reproduce airfoils designed with central design philosophies using only a limited number of design inputs.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2016-03-02 without embargo terms","The student, Kyle Tsai, accepted the attached license on 2015-12-11 at 15:04.","The student, Kyle Tsai, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2015-12-11 at 15:13.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2015-12-11 at 16:56.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #9015 on 2016-03-02 at 12:53:19","Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-02T19:45:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 16 TSAI-THESIS-2015.pdf: 2010890 bytes, checksum: d960d353124e17d8a13c5c0600e4f095 (MD5) abs.tex: 2039 bytes, checksum: 7c4e12eee48fe0348e04f0dbebfd3791 (MD5) ack.tex: 1650 bytes, checksum: 261b98c9e3c9138642bca7d5585b4a38 (MD5) aero_thesis.tex: 9974 bytes, checksum: e3f5a4e5d2d6cf1710afb26f3cc35620 (MD5) appendix_coordinates.tex: 113402 bytes, checksum: 01548e6a8997ec5902451fc1b108fd19 (MD5) appendix_polar.tex: 89535 bytes, checksum: 7f6fd6a399eb7e471fe522f3c74f3dc1 (MD5) appendix_profoil.tex: 7072 bytes, checksum: b81a070c5cac8944e54b8f6d2473aaa2 (MD5) background.tex: 45722 bytes, checksum: 28c45cceee956a640e5813b49fd068ae (MD5) conclusion.tex: 4611 bytes, checksum: 79c1a8b1d6f046e39270196a50102433 (MD5) introduction.tex: 13676 bytes, checksum: 023dfc77417aa57b26ed9214c04076c3 (MD5) methods.tex: 55665 bytes, checksum: a1d5abdf17286bbd173125c7b91706aa (MD5) references.bib: 11777 bytes, checksum: 32acd4739b8f122f86dac6ec0f997254 (MD5) results_study1.tex: 16403 bytes, checksum: 5071d89ade0e75810b75e59da25a8424 (MD5) results_study2.tex: 2602 bytes, checksum: 22a671904ebf9b63a08c2ca2792c8e04 (MD5) results_study3.tex: 9985 bytes, checksum: ff8e3da2794d76ccf76369018dbcdd40 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4206 bytes, checksum: 99219b24981ec4f50e3db2cf255d22f4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-11"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/89100"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2015 Kyle Tsai"],"dc:subject":["Genetic Algorithm (GA)","Evolutionary Algorithms (EA)","airfoil shape optimization","inverse design","multipoint inverse design","PROFOIL","MATLAB","XFOIL"],"dc:title":["Shape optimization of cambered airfoils using a genetic algorithm and a multipoint inverse method"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Aerospace Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:32Z"}