{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/88279"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/88279","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Products and organizations, mirrors in a funhouse: three essays on the mirroring hypothesis","abstract":"Much of the contemporary management literature on modularity implicitly assumes that increased product modularity is associated with advantageous increases in organizational modularity. Known as the “mirroring hypothesis,” this postulated relationship is the basis of prescriptions in favor of increasingly modular product design, despite inconclusive empirical evidence. The three essays in this dissertation seek to advance the extant literature on the mirroring hypothesis in the following ways: Essay one presents a systematic review of this fragmented literature. Specifically, this review finds that the extant literature currently contains inconsistent interpretations of modularity, as well as inconsistent conceptualizations of mirroring. Thus, debates on the mirroring hypothesis often amount to unproductive arguments over different things. Essay two puts forth a theoretical framework to explore mirroring between product and organization at the within-firm level. The proposed theory maintains that mirroring is contingent on the level of architectural knowledge, which correlates with a set of observable constructs. Essay three empirically tests the proposition that mirroring between product and organization is also contingent on the demand characteristics of the target customers. Using a sample constructed from the computer systems integration industry, I found empirical support for the proposed demand-side contingencies on mirroring. Research on the mirroring hypothesis has made important contributions to our understanding of the interactions between technology and organization. However, the extant narratives of mirroring in fact encompass distinct causal mechanisms interacting across multiple units of analysis. As this dissertation research shows, the structural correspondence between product and organization is like mirrors in a funhouse – there are many mirrors; and many of the mirrors are distorted.","abstract_html":"Much of the contemporary management literature on modularity implicitly assumes that increased product modularity is associated with advantageous increases in organizational modularity. Known as the “mirroring hypothesis,” this postulated relationship is the basis of prescriptions in favor of increasingly modular product design, despite inconclusive empirical evidence. The three essays in this dissertation seek to advance the extant literature on the mirroring hypothesis in the following ways: Essay one presents a systematic review of this fragmented literature. Specifically, this review finds that the extant literature currently contains inconsistent interpretations of modularity, as well as inconsistent conceptualizations of mirroring. Thus, debates on the mirroring hypothesis often amount to unproductive arguments over different things. Essay two puts forth a theoretical framework to explore mirroring between product and organization at the within-firm level. The proposed theory maintains that mirroring is contingent on the level of architectural knowledge, which correlates with a set of observable constructs. Essay three empirically tests the proposition that mirroring between product and organization is also contingent on the demand characteristics of the target customers. Using a sample constructed from the computer systems integration industry, I found empirical support for the proposed demand-side contingencies on mirroring. Research on the mirroring hypothesis has made important contributions to our understanding of the interactions between technology and organization. However, the extant narratives of mirroring in fact encompass distinct causal mechanisms interacting across multiple units of analysis. As this dissertation research shows, the structural correspondence between product and organization is like mirrors in a funhouse – there are many mirrors; and many of the mirrors are distorted.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Liu, Chih I"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Business Administration","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mahoney, Joseph T.","Miller, Douglas J.","Bercovitz, Janet E.L.","Somaya, Deepak"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-29T21:03:14Z","date_published":"2015-09-29T21:03:14Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:31Z","subjects":["Modularity","Mirroring hypothesis","Technology management","Product development"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2015 Chih Liu"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/88279","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mahoney, Joseph T.","Miller, Douglas J.","Bercovitz, Janet E.L.","Somaya, Deepak"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Liu, Chih I"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-29T21:03:14Z","2017-09-30T09:15:22Z","2015-08","2015-07-15","2015-8"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Business Administration"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Modularity","Mirroring hypothesis","Technology management","Product development"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2015 Chih Liu"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/88279"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Much of the contemporary management literature on modularity implicitly assumes that increased product modularity is associated with advantageous increases in organizational modularity. Known as the “mirroring hypothesis,” this postulated relationship is the basis of prescriptions in favor of increasingly modular product design, despite inconclusive empirical evidence. The three essays in this dissertation seek to advance the extant literature on the mirroring hypothesis in the following ways: Essay one presents a systematic review of this fragmented literature. Specifically, this review finds that the extant literature currently contains inconsistent interpretations of modularity, as well as inconsistent conceptualizations of mirroring. Thus, debates on the mirroring hypothesis often amount to unproductive arguments over different things. Essay two puts forth a theoretical framework to explore mirroring between product and organization at the within-firm level. The proposed theory maintains that mirroring is contingent on the level of architectural knowledge, which correlates with a set of observable constructs. Essay three empirically tests the proposition that mirroring between product and organization is also contingent on the demand characteristics of the target customers. Using a sample constructed from the computer systems integration industry, I found empirical support for the proposed demand-side contingencies on mirroring. Research on the mirroring hypothesis has made important contributions to our understanding of the interactions between technology and organization. However, the extant narratives of mirroring in fact encompass distinct causal mechanisms interacting across multiple units of analysis. As this dissertation research shows, the structural correspondence between product and organization is like mirrors in a funhouse – there are many mirrors; and many of the mirrors are distorted.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2017-08-01","The student, Chih Liu, accepted the attached license on 2015-07-13 at 04:02.","The student, Chih Liu, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2015-07-13 at 04:03.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2015-07-15 at 14:10.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #8417 on 2015-09-29 at 15:06:02","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-29T21:03:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 LIU-DISSERTATION-2015.pdf: 1056157 bytes, checksum: 63699c1e45a2dff7a8862a42ef5f4025 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4205 bytes, checksum: 7b491c08beb91b76fdb0abe3149a5f40 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-07-15","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 89559 Lift date: 2017-09-29T21:03:28Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 89559 Lift date: 2017-09-29T21:08:35Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 89559 on 2017-09-30T09:15:22Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Products and organizations, mirrors in a funhouse: three essays on the mirroring hypothesis"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mahoney, Joseph T.","Miller, Douglas J.","Bercovitz, Janet E.L.","Somaya, Deepak"],"dc:creator":["Liu, Chih I"],"dc:date":["2015-09-29T21:03:14Z","2017-09-30T09:15:22Z","2015-08","2015-07-15","2015-8"],"dc:description":["Much of the contemporary management literature on modularity implicitly assumes that increased product modularity is associated with advantageous increases in organizational modularity. Known as the “mirroring hypothesis,” this postulated relationship is the basis of prescriptions in favor of increasingly modular product design, despite inconclusive empirical evidence. The three essays in this dissertation seek to advance the extant literature on the mirroring hypothesis in the following ways: Essay one presents a systematic review of this fragmented literature. Specifically, this review finds that the extant literature currently contains inconsistent interpretations of modularity, as well as inconsistent conceptualizations of mirroring. Thus, debates on the mirroring hypothesis often amount to unproductive arguments over different things. Essay two puts forth a theoretical framework to explore mirroring between product and organization at the within-firm level. The proposed theory maintains that mirroring is contingent on the level of architectural knowledge, which correlates with a set of observable constructs. Essay three empirically tests the proposition that mirroring between product and organization is also contingent on the demand characteristics of the target customers. Using a sample constructed from the computer systems integration industry, I found empirical support for the proposed demand-side contingencies on mirroring. Research on the mirroring hypothesis has made important contributions to our understanding of the interactions between technology and organization. However, the extant narratives of mirroring in fact encompass distinct causal mechanisms interacting across multiple units of analysis. As this dissertation research shows, the structural correspondence between product and organization is like mirrors in a funhouse – there are many mirrors; and many of the mirrors are distorted.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2017-08-01","The student, Chih Liu, accepted the attached license on 2015-07-13 at 04:02.","The student, Chih Liu, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2015-07-13 at 04:03.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2015-07-15 at 14:10.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #8417 on 2015-09-29 at 15:06:02","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-29T21:03:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 LIU-DISSERTATION-2015.pdf: 1056157 bytes, checksum: 63699c1e45a2dff7a8862a42ef5f4025 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4205 bytes, checksum: 7b491c08beb91b76fdb0abe3149a5f40 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-07-15","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 89559 Lift date: 2017-09-29T21:03:28Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 89559 Lift date: 2017-09-29T21:08:35Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 89559 on 2017-09-30T09:15:22Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/88279"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2015 Chih Liu"],"dc:subject":["Modularity","Mirroring hypothesis","Technology management","Product development"],"dc:title":["Products and organizations, mirrors in a funhouse: three essays on the mirroring hypothesis"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Business Administration"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:31Z"}