{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87662"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87662","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Management and Interference Potential of Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus Rudis) in Soybean (Glycine Max)","abstract":"Field experiments were conducted during 1996, 1997, and 1998 to determine the common waterhemp interference period soybean could tolerate without reducing seed yield. Removal of common waterhemp interference 2 weeks after soybean unifoliolate expansion resulted in soybean seed yield equivalent to a season-long weed free control, but delaying common waterhemp removal longer than 2 weeks resulted in decreased soybean seed yield. Full season common waterhemp interference reduced soybean seed yield 31%. These results suggest soybean producers should implement common waterhemp management strategies prior to 4 weeks after soybean unifoliolate leaf expansion to reduce potential loss of soybean seed yield.","abstract_html":"Field experiments were conducted during 1996, 1997, and 1998 to determine the common waterhemp interference period soybean could tolerate without reducing seed yield. Removal of common waterhemp interference 2 weeks after soybean unifoliolate expansion resulted in soybean seed yield equivalent to a season-long weed free control, but delaying common waterhemp removal longer than 2 weeks resulted in decreased soybean seed yield. Full season common waterhemp interference reduced soybean seed yield 31%. These results suggest soybean producers should implement common waterhemp management strategies prior to 4 weeks after soybean unifoliolate leaf expansion to reduce potential loss of soybean seed yield.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Hager, Aaron Gregory"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Agronomy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Wax, Loyd M."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-28T16:22:30Z","date_published":"2015-09-28T16:22:30Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:30Z","subjects":["Agriculture, Agronomy"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3017088"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3017088","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87662","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Wax, Loyd M."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Hager, Aaron Gregory"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-28T16:22:30Z","10000-01-01","2001"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Agronomy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Agriculture, Agronomy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87662","(MiAaPQ)AAI3017088"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Field experiments were conducted during 1996, 1997, and 1998 to determine the common waterhemp interference period soybean could tolerate without reducing seed yield. Removal of common waterhemp interference 2 weeks after soybean unifoliolate expansion resulted in soybean seed yield equivalent to a season-long weed free control, but delaying common waterhemp removal longer than 2 weeks resulted in decreased soybean seed yield. Full season common waterhemp interference reduced soybean seed yield 31%. These results suggest soybean producers should implement common waterhemp management strategies prior to 4 weeks after soybean unifoliolate leaf expansion to reduce potential loss of soybean seed yield.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T16:22:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3017088.pdf: 2909123 bytes, checksum: b0f323e1958c4cf3e3684636806abcd7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88943 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community indefinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","65 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Management and Interference Potential of Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus Rudis) in Soybean (Glycine Max)"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Wax, Loyd M."],"dc:creator":["Hager, Aaron Gregory"],"dc:date":["2015-09-28T16:22:30Z","10000-01-01","2001"],"dc:description":["Field experiments were conducted during 1996, 1997, and 1998 to determine the common waterhemp interference period soybean could tolerate without reducing seed yield. Removal of common waterhemp interference 2 weeks after soybean unifoliolate expansion resulted in soybean seed yield equivalent to a season-long weed free control, but delaying common waterhemp removal longer than 2 weeks resulted in decreased soybean seed yield. Full season common waterhemp interference reduced soybean seed yield 31%. These results suggest soybean producers should implement common waterhemp management strategies prior to 4 weeks after soybean unifoliolate leaf expansion to reduce potential loss of soybean seed yield.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T16:22:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3017088.pdf: 2909123 bytes, checksum: b0f323e1958c4cf3e3684636806abcd7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88943 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community indefinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","65 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87662","(MiAaPQ)AAI3017088"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Agriculture, Agronomy"],"dc:title":["Management and Interference Potential of Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus Rudis) in Soybean (Glycine Max)"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Agronomy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:30Z"}