{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87567"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87567","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Women Political Candidates and the Paradoxes of Rhetorical Style: The Effects of Gender and Status on the Rhetorical Style of Barbara Boxer's, Carol Moseley -Braun's, and Patty Murray's 1992 and 1998 Senate Campaigns","abstract":"The analysis suggests that the expectations and obstacles presented by candidate status create difficult if not irresolvable rhetorical problems for women senatorial candidates. Two rhetorical techniques are revealed which explain how the female candidates studied attempted to reconcile the incompatibilities in their political image and discourse which arose mainly from their status as incumbents. The candidates constructed complex, androgynous campaign images in order to respond to stereotypes, repair their images, and emphasize those traits most valued by voters. Moreover, the candidates modified their images and responded rhetorically to their status as incumbents and challengers across election cycles, and within election campaigns as their standings in the polls fluctuated. The implications of these results are threefold: rhetorical style is individual and dynamic; narrow conceptions of style focused on single attributes of candidates are limited; and, the consequences of adopting a particular rhetorical style cannot be generalized. Limitations of the study are also discussed.","abstract_html":"The analysis suggests that the expectations and obstacles presented by candidate status create difficult if not irresolvable rhetorical problems for women senatorial candidates. Two rhetorical techniques are revealed which explain how the female candidates studied attempted to reconcile the incompatibilities in their political image and discourse which arose mainly from their status as incumbents. The candidates constructed complex, androgynous campaign images in order to respond to stereotypes, repair their images, and emphasize those traits most valued by voters. Moreover, the candidates modified their images and responded rhetorically to their status as incumbents and challengers across election cycles, and within election campaigns as their standings in the polls fluctuated. The implications of these results are threefold: rhetorical style is individual and dynamic; narrow conceptions of style focused on single attributes of candidates are limited; and, the consequences of adopting a particular rhetorical style cannot be generalized. Limitations of the study are also discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pierce, Amy Jo"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Speech Communication","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Swanson, David L."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-28T16:05:08Z","date_published":"2015-09-28T16:05:08Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:30Z","subjects":["Biography"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9944968"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9944968","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87567","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Swanson, David L."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pierce, Amy Jo"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-28T16:05:08Z","10000-01-01","1999"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Speech Communication"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Biography"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87567","(MiAaPQ)AAI9944968"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The analysis suggests that the expectations and obstacles presented by candidate status create difficult if not irresolvable rhetorical problems for women senatorial candidates. Two rhetorical techniques are revealed which explain how the female candidates studied attempted to reconcile the incompatibilities in their political image and discourse which arose mainly from their status as incumbents. The candidates constructed complex, androgynous campaign images in order to respond to stereotypes, repair their images, and emphasize those traits most valued by voters. Moreover, the candidates modified their images and responded rhetorically to their status as incumbents and challengers across election cycles, and within election campaigns as their standings in the polls fluctuated. The implications of these results are threefold: rhetorical style is individual and dynamic; narrow conceptions of style focused on single attributes of candidates are limited; and, the consequences of adopting a particular rhetorical style cannot be generalized. Limitations of the study are also discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T16:05:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9944968.pdf: 18677587 bytes, checksum: b446845f23cb30b9fe1e369df4bd6005 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1999","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88848 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","340 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Women Political Candidates and the Paradoxes of Rhetorical Style: The Effects of Gender and Status on the Rhetorical Style of Barbara Boxer's, Carol Moseley -Braun's, and Patty Murray's 1992 and 1998 Senate Campaigns"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Swanson, David L."],"dc:creator":["Pierce, Amy Jo"],"dc:date":["2015-09-28T16:05:08Z","10000-01-01","1999"],"dc:description":["The analysis suggests that the expectations and obstacles presented by candidate status create difficult if not irresolvable rhetorical problems for women senatorial candidates. Two rhetorical techniques are revealed which explain how the female candidates studied attempted to reconcile the incompatibilities in their political image and discourse which arose mainly from their status as incumbents. The candidates constructed complex, androgynous campaign images in order to respond to stereotypes, repair their images, and emphasize those traits most valued by voters. Moreover, the candidates modified their images and responded rhetorically to their status as incumbents and challengers across election cycles, and within election campaigns as their standings in the polls fluctuated. The implications of these results are threefold: rhetorical style is individual and dynamic; narrow conceptions of style focused on single attributes of candidates are limited; and, the consequences of adopting a particular rhetorical style cannot be generalized. Limitations of the study are also discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T16:05:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9944968.pdf: 18677587 bytes, checksum: b446845f23cb30b9fe1e369df4bd6005 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1999","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88848 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","340 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87567","(MiAaPQ)AAI9944968"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Biography"],"dc:title":["Women Political Candidates and the Paradoxes of Rhetorical Style: The Effects of Gender and Status on the Rhetorical Style of Barbara Boxer's, Carol Moseley -Braun's, and Patty Murray's 1992 and 1998 Senate Campaigns"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Speech Communication"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:30Z"}