{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87457"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87457","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"\"The Rhetoric of \"\"Explanation in Lucretius' \"\"De Rerum Natura\"","abstract":"The Introduction states the question, points out the inadequacies of the treatments it received in the past, and advances the first two theses, announcing the way in which they will be supported in the following three chapters. Chapter One addresses Lucretius' choice of presenting Epicurus' teaching in the form of didactic epos, and examines this choice as a rhetorical move that stems from the programmatic goals set by Epicurus. Chapter Two examines the questions of how Lucretius structured his poem, what rhetorical devices did he use to further its transparency, and how are the forms of exposition and organizing principles of DRN related to the formal features of Epicurus' On Nature. Chapter Three is devoted to the main methods of argumentation in DRN, and to the question of how particular stylistic procedures in the poem are connected with particular types of philosophical arguments developed by Epicurus. The Conclusion contains the third thesis and points out that the ultimate goal of Epicurus' and Lucretius' rhetoric was a missionary one---to change the life of the individual.","abstract_html":"The Introduction states the question, points out the inadequacies of the treatments it received in the past, and advances the first two theses, announcing the way in which they will be supported in the following three chapters. Chapter One addresses Lucretius' choice of presenting Epicurus' teaching in the form of didactic epos, and examines this choice as a rhetorical move that stems from the programmatic goals set by Epicurus. Chapter Two examines the questions of how Lucretius structured his poem, what rhetorical devices did he use to further its transparency, and how are the forms of exposition and organizing principles of DRN related to the formal features of Epicurus' On Nature. Chapter Three is devoted to the main methods of argumentation in DRN, and to the question of how particular stylistic procedures in the poem are connected with particular types of philosophical arguments developed by Epicurus. The Conclusion contains the third thesis and points out that the ultimate goal of Epicurus' and Lucretius' rhetoric was a missionary one---to change the life of the individual.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Markovic, Daniel"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Classical Philology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Howard Jacobson"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":null,"date_issued":"10000-01-01","date_published":"10000-01-01","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:30Z","subjects":["Literature, Classical"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3242930"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3242930","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87457","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Howard Jacobson"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Markovic, Daniel"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["10000-01-01","2006","2015-09-28T16:03:39Z"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Classical Philology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Literature, Classical"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87457","(MiAaPQ)AAI3242930"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The Introduction states the question, points out the inadequacies of the treatments it received in the past, and advances the first two theses, announcing the way in which they will be supported in the following three chapters. Chapter One addresses Lucretius' choice of presenting Epicurus' teaching in the form of didactic epos, and examines this choice as a rhetorical move that stems from the programmatic goals set by Epicurus. Chapter Two examines the questions of how Lucretius structured his poem, what rhetorical devices did he use to further its transparency, and how are the forms of exposition and organizing principles of DRN related to the formal features of Epicurus' On Nature. Chapter Three is devoted to the main methods of argumentation in DRN, and to the question of how particular stylistic procedures in the poem are connected with particular types of philosophical arguments developed by Epicurus. The Conclusion contains the third thesis and points out that the ultimate goal of Epicurus' and Lucretius' rhetoric was a missionary one---to change the life of the individual.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T16:03:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3242930.pdf: 4378789 bytes, checksum: 60a6e0bebe1a2740158f24e7207899b1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88738 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","170 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["\"The Rhetoric of \"\"Explanation in Lucretius' \"\"De Rerum Natura\""]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Howard Jacobson"],"dc:creator":["Markovic, Daniel"],"dc:date":["10000-01-01","2006","2015-09-28T16:03:39Z"],"dc:description":["The Introduction states the question, points out the inadequacies of the treatments it received in the past, and advances the first two theses, announcing the way in which they will be supported in the following three chapters. Chapter One addresses Lucretius' choice of presenting Epicurus' teaching in the form of didactic epos, and examines this choice as a rhetorical move that stems from the programmatic goals set by Epicurus. Chapter Two examines the questions of how Lucretius structured his poem, what rhetorical devices did he use to further its transparency, and how are the forms of exposition and organizing principles of DRN related to the formal features of Epicurus' On Nature. Chapter Three is devoted to the main methods of argumentation in DRN, and to the question of how particular stylistic procedures in the poem are connected with particular types of philosophical arguments developed by Epicurus. The Conclusion contains the third thesis and points out that the ultimate goal of Epicurus' and Lucretius' rhetoric was a missionary one---to change the life of the individual.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T16:03:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3242930.pdf: 4378789 bytes, checksum: 60a6e0bebe1a2740158f24e7207899b1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88738 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","170 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87457","(MiAaPQ)AAI3242930"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Literature, Classical"],"dc:title":["\"The Rhetoric of \"\"Explanation in Lucretius' \"\"De Rerum Natura\""],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Classical Philology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:30Z"}