{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87287"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87287","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"\"Hybrid Historiography in Colonial Mexico: Genre, Event and Time in the \"\"Cuauhtitlan Annals\"\" and the \"\"Historia De La Nacion Chichimeca\"","abstract":"\"In this study, I compare how two histories of the pre-Hispanic Nahuas from the late 16th and early 17th centuries reflect their dual cultural and historiographical legacies. My basic thesis is that, far from indicating a merely passive \"\"assimilation\"\" of European culture, these works strategically make use of it as they respond to the colonial situation in which they are immersed. While the Historia de la nacion chichimeca (written in Spanish by the colonial historian Fernando de Alva Ixtlilxochitl), appears to be a more Christianized account of the pre-Hispanic past than the Cuauhtitlan Annals (written in Nahuatl, probably by a Franciscan-educated Nahua scholar), this is not always the case. Making use of historical, literary, and anthropological studies as well as post-colonial theory, I show how, with respect to their generic configuration as well as their representations of the pre-Hispanic event and sense of time, the texts are best described as hybrid, transcultural depictions of the pre-Hispanic past: neither \"\"mostly\"\" Nahua nor \"\"mostly\"\" European, but, often depending on the writers' rhetorical purposes and audience, belonging to both traditions. While the Cuauhtitlan Annals responds to the Spanish colonial order by bringing the pre-Hispanic past into the colonial present and by bearing witness to the impact of the conquest, the Historia de la nacion chichimeca responds to it by projecting the present back into the pre-Hispanic past it constructs.\"","abstract_html":""In this study, I compare how two histories of the pre-Hispanic Nahuas from the late 16th and early 17th centuries reflect their dual cultural and historiographical legacies. My basic thesis is that, far from indicating a merely passive ""assimilation"" of European culture, these works strategically make use of it as they respond to the colonial situation in which they are immersed. While the Historia de la nacion chichimeca (written in Spanish by the colonial historian Fernando de Alva Ixtlilxochitl), appears to be a more Christianized account of the pre-Hispanic past than the Cuauhtitlan Annals (written in Nahuatl, probably by a Franciscan-educated Nahua scholar), this is not always the case. Making use of historical, literary, and anthropological studies as well as post-colonial theory, I show how, with respect to their generic configuration as well as their representations of the pre-Hispanic event and sense of time, the texts are best described as hybrid, transcultural depictions of the pre-Hispanic past: neither ""mostly"" Nahua nor ""mostly"" European, but, often depending on the writers' rhetorical purposes and audience, belonging to both traditions. While the Cuauhtitlan Annals responds to the Spanish colonial order by bringing the pre-Hispanic past into the colonial present and by bearing witness to the impact of the conquest, the Historia de la nacion chichimeca responds to it by projecting the present back into the pre-Hispanic past it constructs."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kauffmann, Leisa Annette"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Comparative Literature","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Idelber Avelar"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-28T15:51:09Z","date_published":"2015-09-28T15:51:09Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:28Z","subjects":["Literature, Latin American"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3130949"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3130949","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87287","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Idelber Avelar"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kauffmann, Leisa Annette"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-28T15:51:09Z","10000-01-01","2004"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Comparative Literature"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Literature, Latin American"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87287","(MiAaPQ)AAI3130949"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"In this study, I compare how two histories of the pre-Hispanic Nahuas from the late 16th and early 17th centuries reflect their dual cultural and historiographical legacies. My basic thesis is that, far from indicating a merely passive \"\"assimilation\"\" of European culture, these works strategically make use of it as they respond to the colonial situation in which they are immersed. While the Historia de la nacion chichimeca (written in Spanish by the colonial historian Fernando de Alva Ixtlilxochitl), appears to be a more Christianized account of the pre-Hispanic past than the Cuauhtitlan Annals (written in Nahuatl, probably by a Franciscan-educated Nahua scholar), this is not always the case. Making use of historical, literary, and anthropological studies as well as post-colonial theory, I show how, with respect to their generic configuration as well as their representations of the pre-Hispanic event and sense of time, the texts are best described as hybrid, transcultural depictions of the pre-Hispanic past: neither \"\"mostly\"\" Nahua nor \"\"mostly\"\" European, but, often depending on the writers' rhetorical purposes and audience, belonging to both traditions. While the Cuauhtitlan Annals responds to the Spanish colonial order by bringing the pre-Hispanic past into the colonial present and by bearing witness to the impact of the conquest, the Historia de la nacion chichimeca responds to it by projecting the present back into the pre-Hispanic past it constructs.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:51:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3130949.pdf: 14255146 bytes, checksum: 30e440e71f7a65703f24239f052dea1e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88568 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","229 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["\"Hybrid Historiography in Colonial Mexico: Genre, Event and Time in the \"\"Cuauhtitlan Annals\"\" and the \"\"Historia De La Nacion Chichimeca\""]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Idelber Avelar"],"dc:creator":["Kauffmann, Leisa Annette"],"dc:date":["2015-09-28T15:51:09Z","10000-01-01","2004"],"dc:description":["\"In this study, I compare how two histories of the pre-Hispanic Nahuas from the late 16th and early 17th centuries reflect their dual cultural and historiographical legacies. My basic thesis is that, far from indicating a merely passive \"\"assimilation\"\" of European culture, these works strategically make use of it as they respond to the colonial situation in which they are immersed. While the Historia de la nacion chichimeca (written in Spanish by the colonial historian Fernando de Alva Ixtlilxochitl), appears to be a more Christianized account of the pre-Hispanic past than the Cuauhtitlan Annals (written in Nahuatl, probably by a Franciscan-educated Nahua scholar), this is not always the case. Making use of historical, literary, and anthropological studies as well as post-colonial theory, I show how, with respect to their generic configuration as well as their representations of the pre-Hispanic event and sense of time, the texts are best described as hybrid, transcultural depictions of the pre-Hispanic past: neither \"\"mostly\"\" Nahua nor \"\"mostly\"\" European, but, often depending on the writers' rhetorical purposes and audience, belonging to both traditions. While the Cuauhtitlan Annals responds to the Spanish colonial order by bringing the pre-Hispanic past into the colonial present and by bearing witness to the impact of the conquest, the Historia de la nacion chichimeca responds to it by projecting the present back into the pre-Hispanic past it constructs.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:51:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3130949.pdf: 14255146 bytes, checksum: 30e440e71f7a65703f24239f052dea1e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88568 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","229 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87287","(MiAaPQ)AAI3130949"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Literature, Latin American"],"dc:title":["\"Hybrid Historiography in Colonial Mexico: Genre, Event and Time in the \"\"Cuauhtitlan Annals\"\" and the \"\"Historia De La Nacion Chichimeca\""],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Comparative Literature"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:28Z"}