{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87101"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/87101","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"A Comparison of Push/pull Hybrid Manufacturing Control Strategies","abstract":"These strategies are compared in a similar manner for a more complex example. A portion of an actual consumer electronics assembly line is simulated. The objective in this example is to maximize throughput. Similarities and differences exist between the two examples. Results suggest that no strategy dominates all others under all the conditions analyzed, although CONWIP is shown to be a robust, consistent, and practical approach. In many cases, no significant difference in performance of selected strategies can be proven. In addition, the manufacturing objective and other factors within the environment, as well as strategy, are shown to have an impact on a system's performance. This study is significant for manufacturing managers who are dissatisfied with MRP or JIT and are seeking an alternative.","abstract_html":"These strategies are compared in a similar manner for a more complex example. A portion of an actual consumer electronics assembly line is simulated. The objective in this example is to maximize throughput. Similarities and differences exist between the two examples. Results suggest that no strategy dominates all others under all the conditions analyzed, although CONWIP is shown to be a robust, consistent, and practical approach. In many cases, no significant difference in performance of selected strategies can be proven. In addition, the manufacturing objective and other factors within the environment, as well as strategy, are shown to have an impact on a system's performance. This study is significant for manufacturing managers who are dissatisfied with MRP or JIT and are seeking an alternative.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Orth, Mark Joseph"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Industrial Engineering","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Osman Coskunoglu"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-28T15:37:25Z","date_published":"2015-09-28T15:37:25Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:28Z","subjects":["Business Administration, Management"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9812725"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9812725","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87101","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Osman Coskunoglu"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Orth, Mark Joseph"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-28T15:37:25Z","10000-01-01","1997"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Industrial Engineering"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Business Administration, Management"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87101","(MiAaPQ)AAI9812725"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["These strategies are compared in a similar manner for a more complex example. A portion of an actual consumer electronics assembly line is simulated. The objective in this example is to maximize throughput. Similarities and differences exist between the two examples. Results suggest that no strategy dominates all others under all the conditions analyzed, although CONWIP is shown to be a robust, consistent, and practical approach. In many cases, no significant difference in performance of selected strategies can be proven. In addition, the manufacturing objective and other factors within the environment, as well as strategy, are shown to have an impact on a system's performance. This study is significant for manufacturing managers who are dissatisfied with MRP or JIT and are seeking an alternative.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:37:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9812725.pdf: 6018675 bytes, checksum: c88b68abcc2ce8340eefade35faf5396 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1997","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88382 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","186 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1997."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Comparison of Push/pull Hybrid Manufacturing Control Strategies"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Osman Coskunoglu"],"dc:creator":["Orth, Mark Joseph"],"dc:date":["2015-09-28T15:37:25Z","10000-01-01","1997"],"dc:description":["These strategies are compared in a similar manner for a more complex example. A portion of an actual consumer electronics assembly line is simulated. The objective in this example is to maximize throughput. Similarities and differences exist between the two examples. Results suggest that no strategy dominates all others under all the conditions analyzed, although CONWIP is shown to be a robust, consistent, and practical approach. In many cases, no significant difference in performance of selected strategies can be proven. In addition, the manufacturing objective and other factors within the environment, as well as strategy, are shown to have an impact on a system's performance. This study is significant for manufacturing managers who are dissatisfied with MRP or JIT and are seeking an alternative.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:37:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9812725.pdf: 6018675 bytes, checksum: c88b68abcc2ce8340eefade35faf5396 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1997","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 88382 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","186 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1997."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/87101","(MiAaPQ)AAI9812725"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Business Administration, Management"],"dc:title":["A Comparison of Push/pull Hybrid Manufacturing Control Strategies"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Industrial Engineering"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:28Z"}