{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/86584"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/86584","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Anticorruption Television Dramas: Between Propaganda and Popular Culture in Globalizing China","abstract":"I argue that anticorruption drama serials are the result of complex negotiations and compromises between the Party, commercializing media institutions, and a number of influential writers, in a context of social unrest fueled by corruption. At the content level, anticorruption dramas are ideologically complex products, providing a certain degree of openness for negotiation. Although the dominant narrative about corruption is provided by the official discourse, these drama serials are much more complicated narratives that engage a variety of alternative discourses about corruption. Through textual analyses and audience interviews, I identified four major overlapping and conflicting interpretive frameworks in almost each of the drama serials under study. The results are mixed for the official discourse of corruption, which is sometimes reinforced but frequently rendered vulnerable to serious criticism if not subversion. But in the end, none of the alternative discourses poses a challenge to the legitimacy of the market reform policy, which suggests a more fundamental hegemony at work.","abstract_html":"I argue that anticorruption drama serials are the result of complex negotiations and compromises between the Party, commercializing media institutions, and a number of influential writers, in a context of social unrest fueled by corruption. At the content level, anticorruption dramas are ideologically complex products, providing a certain degree of openness for negotiation. Although the dominant narrative about corruption is provided by the official discourse, these drama serials are much more complicated narratives that engage a variety of alternative discourses about corruption. Through textual analyses and audience interviews, I identified four major overlapping and conflicting interpretive frameworks in almost each of the drama serials under study. The results are mixed for the official discourse of corruption, which is sometimes reinforced but frequently rendered vulnerable to serious criticism if not subversion. But in the end, none of the alternative discourses poses a challenge to the legitimacy of the market reform policy, which suggests a more fundamental hegemony at work.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bai, Ruoyun"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Communications","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bruce A. Williams"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-28T15:15:39Z","date_published":"2015-09-28T15:15:39Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:27Z","subjects":["Mass Communications"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3290171"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3290171","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/86584","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bruce A. Williams"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bai, Ruoyun"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-28T15:15:39Z","10000-01-01","2007"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Communications"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Mass Communications"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/86584","(MiAaPQ)AAI3290171"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["I argue that anticorruption drama serials are the result of complex negotiations and compromises between the Party, commercializing media institutions, and a number of influential writers, in a context of social unrest fueled by corruption. At the content level, anticorruption dramas are ideologically complex products, providing a certain degree of openness for negotiation. Although the dominant narrative about corruption is provided by the official discourse, these drama serials are much more complicated narratives that engage a variety of alternative discourses about corruption. Through textual analyses and audience interviews, I identified four major overlapping and conflicting interpretive frameworks in almost each of the drama serials under study. The results are mixed for the official discourse of corruption, which is sometimes reinforced but frequently rendered vulnerable to serious criticism if not subversion. But in the end, none of the alternative discourses poses a challenge to the legitimacy of the market reform policy, which suggests a more fundamental hegemony at work.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:15:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3290171.pdf: 6806862 bytes, checksum: 400aff84f04994109c71e28bcfcc30a2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 87865 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","189 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2007."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Anticorruption Television Dramas: Between Propaganda and Popular Culture in Globalizing China"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bruce A. Williams"],"dc:creator":["Bai, Ruoyun"],"dc:date":["2015-09-28T15:15:39Z","10000-01-01","2007"],"dc:description":["I argue that anticorruption drama serials are the result of complex negotiations and compromises between the Party, commercializing media institutions, and a number of influential writers, in a context of social unrest fueled by corruption. At the content level, anticorruption dramas are ideologically complex products, providing a certain degree of openness for negotiation. Although the dominant narrative about corruption is provided by the official discourse, these drama serials are much more complicated narratives that engage a variety of alternative discourses about corruption. Through textual analyses and audience interviews, I identified four major overlapping and conflicting interpretive frameworks in almost each of the drama serials under study. The results are mixed for the official discourse of corruption, which is sometimes reinforced but frequently rendered vulnerable to serious criticism if not subversion. But in the end, none of the alternative discourses poses a challenge to the legitimacy of the market reform policy, which suggests a more fundamental hegemony at work.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:15:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3290171.pdf: 6806862 bytes, checksum: 400aff84f04994109c71e28bcfcc30a2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 87865 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","189 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2007."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/86584","(MiAaPQ)AAI3290171"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Mass Communications"],"dc:title":["Anticorruption Television Dramas: Between Propaganda and Popular Culture in Globalizing China"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Communications"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:27Z"}