{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/86555"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/86555","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Grassy Knoll-Edges: Conspiracy Theories and Political Rationality in the 1990s","abstract":"\"This dissertation studies the recent proliferation of conspiracy theories in the United States and the attending ways official analyses have assessed them as a political problem. First, I examine the common representations of conspiracy theories by prominent cultural texts and institutions. Mainstream journalism (major newspapers, weekly magazines, and television broadcast news programs), alternative press organs (especially Left and liberal news magazines), and popular cultural media (television dramas and talk shows, Hollywood films, and best-selling books) are investigated for their similarities and differences with regards to representing conspiracy theories. Second, I analyze the conspiracy theories on their own terms. In doing so, I concentrate on how they take themselves as objects of concern, and I locate the points of intersection and conflict with the mainstream institutions that objectify them. I also examine how emerging technologies (especially the Internet) contribute to the dissemination of conspiracy theories, as well as to the concern about these theories by official institutions. Specifically, I focus on how the commonsensical representations of \"\"conspiracy theories\"\" are bound up with present day issues of political dissent and consent. What are the parameters of acceptable dissent in contemporary politics, and what new forms of consent are being forged? As reflections on citizenship, these representations of \"\"political paranoia\"\" continue the perpetual self-questioning of \"\"the American Character\"\" that composes American political history. I argue, then, that the recognition of conspiracy theories is also a recognition of our political possibilities and limitations in the contemporary American landscape.\"","abstract_html":""This dissertation studies the recent proliferation of conspiracy theories in the United States and the attending ways official analyses have assessed them as a political problem. First, I examine the common representations of conspiracy theories by prominent cultural texts and institutions. Mainstream journalism (major newspapers, weekly magazines, and television broadcast news programs), alternative press organs (especially Left and liberal news magazines), and popular cultural media (television dramas and talk shows, Hollywood films, and best-selling books) are investigated for their similarities and differences with regards to representing conspiracy theories. Second, I analyze the conspiracy theories on their own terms. In doing so, I concentrate on how they take themselves as objects of concern, and I locate the points of intersection and conflict with the mainstream institutions that objectify them. I also examine how emerging technologies (especially the Internet) contribute to the dissemination of conspiracy theories, as well as to the concern about these theories by official institutions. Specifically, I focus on how the commonsensical representations of ""conspiracy theories"" are bound up with present day issues of political dissent and consent. What are the parameters of acceptable dissent in contemporary politics, and what new forms of consent are being forged? As reflections on citizenship, these representations of ""political paranoia"" continue the perpetual self-questioning of ""the American Character"" that composes American political history. I argue, then, that the recognition of conspiracy theories is also a recognition of our political possibilities and limitations in the contemporary American landscape."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bratich, Jack Zeljko"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Communications","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Treichler, Paula A."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-28T15:15:19Z","date_published":"2015-09-28T15:15:19Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:27Z","subjects":["Political Science, General"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3023024"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3023024","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/86555","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Treichler, Paula A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bratich, Jack Zeljko"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-28T15:15:19Z","10000-01-01","2001"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Communications"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Political Science, General"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/86555","(MiAaPQ)AAI3023024"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"This dissertation studies the recent proliferation of conspiracy theories in the United States and the attending ways official analyses have assessed them as a political problem. First, I examine the common representations of conspiracy theories by prominent cultural texts and institutions. Mainstream journalism (major newspapers, weekly magazines, and television broadcast news programs), alternative press organs (especially Left and liberal news magazines), and popular cultural media (television dramas and talk shows, Hollywood films, and best-selling books) are investigated for their similarities and differences with regards to representing conspiracy theories. Second, I analyze the conspiracy theories on their own terms. In doing so, I concentrate on how they take themselves as objects of concern, and I locate the points of intersection and conflict with the mainstream institutions that objectify them. I also examine how emerging technologies (especially the Internet) contribute to the dissemination of conspiracy theories, as well as to the concern about these theories by official institutions. Specifically, I focus on how the commonsensical representations of \"\"conspiracy theories\"\" are bound up with present day issues of political dissent and consent. What are the parameters of acceptable dissent in contemporary politics, and what new forms of consent are being forged? As reflections on citizenship, these representations of \"\"political paranoia\"\" continue the perpetual self-questioning of \"\"the American Character\"\" that composes American political history. I argue, then, that the recognition of conspiracy theories is also a recognition of our political possibilities and limitations in the contemporary American landscape.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:15:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3023024.pdf: 15502286 bytes, checksum: 7caae872abfa1f7ebb3e42bf840c37cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 87836 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","311 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Grassy Knoll-Edges: Conspiracy Theories and Political Rationality in the 1990s"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Treichler, Paula A."],"dc:creator":["Bratich, Jack Zeljko"],"dc:date":["2015-09-28T15:15:19Z","10000-01-01","2001"],"dc:description":["\"This dissertation studies the recent proliferation of conspiracy theories in the United States and the attending ways official analyses have assessed them as a political problem. First, I examine the common representations of conspiracy theories by prominent cultural texts and institutions. Mainstream journalism (major newspapers, weekly magazines, and television broadcast news programs), alternative press organs (especially Left and liberal news magazines), and popular cultural media (television dramas and talk shows, Hollywood films, and best-selling books) are investigated for their similarities and differences with regards to representing conspiracy theories. Second, I analyze the conspiracy theories on their own terms. In doing so, I concentrate on how they take themselves as objects of concern, and I locate the points of intersection and conflict with the mainstream institutions that objectify them. I also examine how emerging technologies (especially the Internet) contribute to the dissemination of conspiracy theories, as well as to the concern about these theories by official institutions. Specifically, I focus on how the commonsensical representations of \"\"conspiracy theories\"\" are bound up with present day issues of political dissent and consent. What are the parameters of acceptable dissent in contemporary politics, and what new forms of consent are being forged? As reflections on citizenship, these representations of \"\"political paranoia\"\" continue the perpetual self-questioning of \"\"the American Character\"\" that composes American political history. I argue, then, that the recognition of conspiracy theories is also a recognition of our political possibilities and limitations in the contemporary American landscape.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:15:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3023024.pdf: 15502286 bytes, checksum: 7caae872abfa1f7ebb3e42bf840c37cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 87836 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","311 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/86555","(MiAaPQ)AAI3023024"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Political Science, General"],"dc:title":["Grassy Knoll-Edges: Conspiracy Theories and Political Rationality in the 1990s"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Communications"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:27Z"}