{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/86514"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/86514","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"International Commercial Online Dispute Resolution: Just Procedure Through the Internet","abstract":"\"Dispute resolution procedures that use Information Communication Technology (ICT) are generally referred to as \"\"Online Dispute Resolution\"\" or \"\"ODR.\"\" International Commercial Online Dispute Resolution (ICODR) claims to provide a fair and efficient mechanism for dispute resolution, promising easy access, convenience, low expense, fast resolution, without the costs associated with a personal appearance. Despite its promise, ICODR has not been as popular as expected, perhaps because ineffective regulation has produced both uncertainty and a lack of confidence as found in the empirical research of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings. There have been many proposals to regulate ICODR appropriately, which can be classified roughly into three types: the private regulation approach, the public regulation approach, and the hybrid regulation approach. Assuming the hybrid regulation approach is appropriate and effective, this research proposes two key ideas to regulate ICODR: trustmark accreditation system and transnational networking system.\"","abstract_html":""Dispute resolution procedures that use Information Communication Technology (ICT) are generally referred to as ""Online Dispute Resolution"" or ""ODR."" International Commercial Online Dispute Resolution (ICODR) claims to provide a fair and efficient mechanism for dispute resolution, promising easy access, convenience, low expense, fast resolution, without the costs associated with a personal appearance. Despite its promise, ICODR has not been as popular as expected, perhaps because ineffective regulation has produced both uncertainty and a lack of confidence as found in the empirical research of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings. There have been many proposals to regulate ICODR appropriately, which can be classified roughly into three types: the private regulation approach, the public regulation approach, and the hybrid regulation approach. Assuming the hybrid regulation approach is appropriate and effective, this research proposes two key ideas to regulate ICODR: trustmark accreditation system and transnational networking system."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Cho, Soo Hye"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"J.S.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Law","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Lawrence B. Solum"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-28T15:12:09Z","date_published":"2015-09-28T15:12:09Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:27Z","subjects":["Political Science, International Law and Relations"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3362753"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3362753","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/86514","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Lawrence B. Solum"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Cho, Soo Hye"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-28T15:12:09Z","10000-01-01","2009"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Law"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["J.S.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Political Science, International Law and Relations"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/86514","(MiAaPQ)AAI3362753"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"Dispute resolution procedures that use Information Communication Technology (ICT) are generally referred to as \"\"Online Dispute Resolution\"\" or \"\"ODR.\"\" International Commercial Online Dispute Resolution (ICODR) claims to provide a fair and efficient mechanism for dispute resolution, promising easy access, convenience, low expense, fast resolution, without the costs associated with a personal appearance. Despite its promise, ICODR has not been as popular as expected, perhaps because ineffective regulation has produced both uncertainty and a lack of confidence as found in the empirical research of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings. There have been many proposals to regulate ICODR appropriately, which can be classified roughly into three types: the private regulation approach, the public regulation approach, and the hybrid regulation approach. Assuming the hybrid regulation approach is appropriate and effective, this research proposes two key ideas to regulate ICODR: trustmark accreditation system and transnational networking system.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:12:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3362753.pdf: 10843493 bytes, checksum: 5ab7c5d33ca3bbb62473fd9971d306e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 87795 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","218 p.","Thesis (J.S.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["International Commercial Online Dispute Resolution: Just Procedure Through the Internet"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Lawrence B. Solum"],"dc:creator":["Cho, Soo Hye"],"dc:date":["2015-09-28T15:12:09Z","10000-01-01","2009"],"dc:description":["\"Dispute resolution procedures that use Information Communication Technology (ICT) are generally referred to as \"\"Online Dispute Resolution\"\" or \"\"ODR.\"\" International Commercial Online Dispute Resolution (ICODR) claims to provide a fair and efficient mechanism for dispute resolution, promising easy access, convenience, low expense, fast resolution, without the costs associated with a personal appearance. Despite its promise, ICODR has not been as popular as expected, perhaps because ineffective regulation has produced both uncertainty and a lack of confidence as found in the empirical research of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings. There have been many proposals to regulate ICODR appropriately, which can be classified roughly into three types: the private regulation approach, the public regulation approach, and the hybrid regulation approach. Assuming the hybrid regulation approach is appropriate and effective, this research proposes two key ideas to regulate ICODR: trustmark accreditation system and transnational networking system.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-28T15:12:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3362753.pdf: 10843493 bytes, checksum: 5ab7c5d33ca3bbb62473fd9971d306e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 87795 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","218 p.","Thesis (J.S.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/86514","(MiAaPQ)AAI3362753"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Political Science, International Law and Relations"],"dc:title":["International Commercial Online Dispute Resolution: Just Procedure Through the Internet"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Law"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["J.S.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:27Z"}