{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/85670"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/85670","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Consumer Search and Price Discrimination: Theory and Evidence From the United States Long-Distance Market","abstract":"I also introduce a two-stage long distance carrier choice model that incorporates choice set restrictions based on costly search. I find that cross firm price elasticities for high volume consumers are 87% higher than for low volume consumers based on their lifetime search experience. In addition, it is estimated that, conditional on consumers being fully informed about prices, a 1% increment in the price spread between AT&T and other long distance carriers would lead to a 4% reduction in AT&T market share. However, quantile regression estimates show that household long distance demand price elasticities are higher for light callers. Together, the results suggest that, although low volume consumers tend to be less informed about price differences across calling plans, their higher price elasticity limits the average price that they pay. The findings presented in this thesis have specific implications for regulatory policy. In markets facing new competition (e.g., local telephone service, electricity service), competition is likely to emerge first and be more vigorous for higher volume consumers. Hence, deregulation should be stronger for services aimed at this group of consumers.","abstract_html":"I also introduce a two-stage long distance carrier choice model that incorporates choice set restrictions based on costly search. I find that cross firm price elasticities for high volume consumers are 87% higher than for low volume consumers based on their lifetime search experience. In addition, it is estimated that, conditional on consumers being fully informed about prices, a 1% increment in the price spread between AT&T and other long distance carriers would lead to a 4% reduction in AT&T market share. However, quantile regression estimates show that household long distance demand price elasticities are higher for light callers. Together, the results suggest that, although low volume consumers tend to be less informed about price differences across calling plans, their higher price elasticity limits the average price that they pay. The findings presented in this thesis have specific implications for regulatory policy. In markets facing new competition (e.g., local telephone service, electricity service), competition is likely to emerge first and be more vigorous for higher volume consumers. Hence, deregulation should be stronger for services aimed at this group of consumers.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Arango, Carlos Alberto"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Economics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["George M. Deltas"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T22:47:53Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T22:47:53Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:25Z","subjects":["Business Administration, Marketing"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9989932"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9989932","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/85670","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["George M. Deltas"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Arango, Carlos Alberto"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T22:47:53Z","10000-01-01","2000"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Economics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Business Administration, Marketing"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/85670","(MiAaPQ)AAI9989932"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["I also introduce a two-stage long distance carrier choice model that incorporates choice set restrictions based on costly search. I find that cross firm price elasticities for high volume consumers are 87% higher than for low volume consumers based on their lifetime search experience. In addition, it is estimated that, conditional on consumers being fully informed about prices, a 1% increment in the price spread between AT&T and other long distance carriers would lead to a 4% reduction in AT&T market share. However, quantile regression estimates show that household long distance demand price elasticities are higher for light callers. Together, the results suggest that, although low volume consumers tend to be less informed about price differences across calling plans, their higher price elasticity limits the average price that they pay. The findings presented in this thesis have specific implications for regulatory policy. In markets facing new competition (e.g., local telephone service, electricity service), competition is likely to emerge first and be more vigorous for higher volume consumers. Hence, deregulation should be stronger for services aimed at this group of consumers.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:47:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9989932.pdf: 5195731 bytes, checksum: c6aae0cc607979858d98affec5438eb3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2000","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 86951 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","111 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2000."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Consumer Search and Price Discrimination: Theory and Evidence From the United States Long-Distance Market"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["George M. Deltas"],"dc:creator":["Arango, Carlos Alberto"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T22:47:53Z","10000-01-01","2000"],"dc:description":["I also introduce a two-stage long distance carrier choice model that incorporates choice set restrictions based on costly search. I find that cross firm price elasticities for high volume consumers are 87% higher than for low volume consumers based on their lifetime search experience. In addition, it is estimated that, conditional on consumers being fully informed about prices, a 1% increment in the price spread between AT&T and other long distance carriers would lead to a 4% reduction in AT&T market share. However, quantile regression estimates show that household long distance demand price elasticities are higher for light callers. Together, the results suggest that, although low volume consumers tend to be less informed about price differences across calling plans, their higher price elasticity limits the average price that they pay. The findings presented in this thesis have specific implications for regulatory policy. In markets facing new competition (e.g., local telephone service, electricity service), competition is likely to emerge first and be more vigorous for higher volume consumers. Hence, deregulation should be stronger for services aimed at this group of consumers.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:47:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9989932.pdf: 5195731 bytes, checksum: c6aae0cc607979858d98affec5438eb3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2000","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 86951 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","111 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2000."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/85670","(MiAaPQ)AAI9989932"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Business Administration, Marketing"],"dc:title":["Consumer Search and Price Discrimination: Theory and Evidence From the United States Long-Distance Market"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Economics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:25Z"}