{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/85616"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/85616","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Essays in Life Cycle Economies","abstract":"The second essay deals with one of the stylized facts in the literature on savings. Among the oldest reported facts about savings behavior in cross section data, is that the fraction of income saved by households is increasing in household income. Furthermore, the differences in saving rates can be of considerable magnitude. For instance, the data compiled in Kuznets (1953) and Projector (1968), showed that households with incomes below one half of the mean income generally dissave, whereas households with incomes at or above two times the mean income save about twenty percent of their income. Given this, this essay is centered around two questions: What are the economic forces that contribute to explain this observation? Can calibrated general equilibrium model economies display stationary equilibrium saving rates that are increasing in household income? In answering the first of the posed questions, it is shown that the key forces behind the savings observations are the age structure of households (demographics), large permanent differences in labor earnings, and a social security system with similar attributes to the one that actually prevails in the U.S. It is also found, surprisingly, that temporary earnings shocks are not essential in generating the cross sectional saving facts. In terms of the second question, it is quantitatively demonstrated that life cycle economies with heterogeneous agents are successful in reproducing the saving observations. Moreover, simple life cycle models that do not account for agent heterogeneity, cannot generate the wide array of saving rates at different income levels that is displayed in U.S. cross section data. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).","abstract_html":"The second essay deals with one of the stylized facts in the literature on savings. Among the oldest reported facts about savings behavior in cross section data, is that the fraction of income saved by households is increasing in household income. Furthermore, the differences in saving rates can be of considerable magnitude. For instance, the data compiled in Kuznets (1953) and Projector (1968), showed that households with incomes below one half of the mean income generally dissave, whereas households with incomes at or above two times the mean income save about twenty percent of their income. Given this, this essay is centered around two questions: What are the economic forces that contribute to explain this observation? Can calibrated general equilibrium model economies display stationary equilibrium saving rates that are increasing in household income? In answering the first of the posed questions, it is shown that the key forces behind the savings observations are the age structure of households (demographics), large permanent differences in labor earnings, and a social security system with similar attributes to the one that actually prevails in the U.S. It is also found, surprisingly, that temporary earnings shocks are not essential in generating the cross sectional saving facts. In terms of the second question, it is quantitatively demonstrated that life cycle economies with heterogeneous agents are successful in reproducing the saving observations. Moreover, simple life cycle models that do not account for agent heterogeneity, cannot generate the wide array of saving rates at different income levels that is displayed in U.S. cross section data. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ventura, Gustavo Jaime"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Economics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mark Huggett"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":null,"date_issued":"10000-01-01","date_published":"10000-01-01","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:25Z","subjects":["Economics, General"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9737280"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9737280","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/85616","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mark Huggett"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ventura, Gustavo Jaime"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["10000-01-01","1997","2015-09-25T22:47:37Z"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Economics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Economics, General"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/85616","(MiAaPQ)AAI9737280"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The second essay deals with one of the stylized facts in the literature on savings. Among the oldest reported facts about savings behavior in cross section data, is that the fraction of income saved by households is increasing in household income. Furthermore, the differences in saving rates can be of considerable magnitude. For instance, the data compiled in Kuznets (1953) and Projector (1968), showed that households with incomes below one half of the mean income generally dissave, whereas households with incomes at or above two times the mean income save about twenty percent of their income. Given this, this essay is centered around two questions: What are the economic forces that contribute to explain this observation? Can calibrated general equilibrium model economies display stationary equilibrium saving rates that are increasing in household income? In answering the first of the posed questions, it is shown that the key forces behind the savings observations are the age structure of households (demographics), large permanent differences in labor earnings, and a social security system with similar attributes to the one that actually prevails in the U.S. It is also found, surprisingly, that temporary earnings shocks are not essential in generating the cross sectional saving facts. In terms of the second question, it is quantitatively demonstrated that life cycle economies with heterogeneous agents are successful in reproducing the saving observations. Moreover, simple life cycle models that do not account for agent heterogeneity, cannot generate the wide array of saving rates at different income levels that is displayed in U.S. cross section data. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:47:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9737280.pdf: 4741794 bytes, checksum: f0d7ae8f4cf5261099db22f2f1f925e1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1997","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 86897 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","92 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1997."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Essays in Life Cycle Economies"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mark Huggett"],"dc:creator":["Ventura, Gustavo Jaime"],"dc:date":["10000-01-01","1997","2015-09-25T22:47:37Z"],"dc:description":["The second essay deals with one of the stylized facts in the literature on savings. Among the oldest reported facts about savings behavior in cross section data, is that the fraction of income saved by households is increasing in household income. Furthermore, the differences in saving rates can be of considerable magnitude. For instance, the data compiled in Kuznets (1953) and Projector (1968), showed that households with incomes below one half of the mean income generally dissave, whereas households with incomes at or above two times the mean income save about twenty percent of their income. Given this, this essay is centered around two questions: What are the economic forces that contribute to explain this observation? Can calibrated general equilibrium model economies display stationary equilibrium saving rates that are increasing in household income? In answering the first of the posed questions, it is shown that the key forces behind the savings observations are the age structure of households (demographics), large permanent differences in labor earnings, and a social security system with similar attributes to the one that actually prevails in the U.S. It is also found, surprisingly, that temporary earnings shocks are not essential in generating the cross sectional saving facts. In terms of the second question, it is quantitatively demonstrated that life cycle economies with heterogeneous agents are successful in reproducing the saving observations. Moreover, simple life cycle models that do not account for agent heterogeneity, cannot generate the wide array of saving rates at different income levels that is displayed in U.S. cross section data. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:47:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9737280.pdf: 4741794 bytes, checksum: f0d7ae8f4cf5261099db22f2f1f925e1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1997","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 86897 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","92 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1997."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/85616","(MiAaPQ)AAI9737280"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Economics, General"],"dc:title":["Essays in Life Cycle Economies"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Economics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:25Z"}