{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/84758"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/84758","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"From Sympathy to Synergy: Humane Activism in the Modern Environmental Movement","abstract":"Animal welfare activists contributed both substance and style to the environmental movement that emerged in the years following the Second World War. Women tended to take a more active role than men in humane politics. A loose network of women activists led campaigns to save marine mammals from hunters, predators from traps and poisons, primates from laboratories and birds from pesticides, among many other issues. They explicitly recognized a place for human uses of other animals, but denied that cruelty and outright extirpation was an inescapable and acceptable side effect of such uses. These women relied upon personal connections as well as organizational ones to coordinate programs designed to optimize paths to animal protection, whether through legislative, regulatory or social and cultural changes. Humane workers increasingly turned to science to support their values and their politics, and they were rewarded with new understandings of human/animal relationships through advances in science in every field from ecology and ethology to genetics. Animal welfare activists capitalized on the widespread sympathy for other animals that Americans exhibited during the post-war years to lobby for legislation to protect animals from systematic cruelties, including those affecting wild animals. They recognized that cruelties to wildlife such as traps and poisons, pesticides, oil spills and other habitat despoliation were also threats to nature more generally and to human quality of life. The combination of science and compassion proved to be a fruitful one for environmentalists because Americans reacted strongly to issues affecting' animals. Sympathy for animals supported and extended ecological arguments, while increased ecological understanding supported arguments in favor of avoiding cruel exploitation of animals. The environmental movement that exploded in the 1960s and 1970s benefited greatly from access to the political strategies and issues developed by humane workers starting in the 1950s. Compassion for other animals thus claimed an important place in the constellation of environmental ethics and politics.","abstract_html":"Animal welfare activists contributed both substance and style to the environmental movement that emerged in the years following the Second World War. Women tended to take a more active role than men in humane politics. A loose network of women activists led campaigns to save marine mammals from hunters, predators from traps and poisons, primates from laboratories and birds from pesticides, among many other issues. They explicitly recognized a place for human uses of other animals, but denied that cruelty and outright extirpation was an inescapable and acceptable side effect of such uses. These women relied upon personal connections as well as organizational ones to coordinate programs designed to optimize paths to animal protection, whether through legislative, regulatory or social and cultural changes. Humane workers increasingly turned to science to support their values and their politics, and they were rewarded with new understandings of human/animal relationships through advances in science in every field from ecology and ethology to genetics. Animal welfare activists capitalized on the widespread sympathy for other animals that Americans exhibited during the post-war years to lobby for legislation to protect animals from systematic cruelties, including those affecting wild animals. They recognized that cruelties to wildlife such as traps and poisons, pesticides, oil spills and other habitat despoliation were also threats to nature more generally and to human quality of life. The combination of science and compassion proved to be a fruitful one for environmentalists because Americans reacted strongly to issues affecting' animals. Sympathy for animals supported and extended ecological arguments, while increased ecological understanding supported arguments in favor of avoiding cruel exploitation of animals. The environmental movement that exploded in the 1960s and 1970s benefited greatly from access to the political strategies and issues developed by humane workers starting in the 1950s. Compassion for other animals thus claimed an important place in the constellation of environmental ethics and politics.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Daitch, Vicki McKinney"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"History","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mark Leff"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T22:24:28Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T22:24:28Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:23Z","subjects":["History, Modern"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9955604"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9955604","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84758","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mark Leff"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Daitch, Vicki McKinney"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T22:24:28Z","10000-01-01","2000"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["History"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["History, Modern"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84758","(MiAaPQ)AAI9955604"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Animal welfare activists contributed both substance and style to the environmental movement that emerged in the years following the Second World War. Women tended to take a more active role than men in humane politics. A loose network of women activists led campaigns to save marine mammals from hunters, predators from traps and poisons, primates from laboratories and birds from pesticides, among many other issues. They explicitly recognized a place for human uses of other animals, but denied that cruelty and outright extirpation was an inescapable and acceptable side effect of such uses. These women relied upon personal connections as well as organizational ones to coordinate programs designed to optimize paths to animal protection, whether through legislative, regulatory or social and cultural changes. Humane workers increasingly turned to science to support their values and their politics, and they were rewarded with new understandings of human/animal relationships through advances in science in every field from ecology and ethology to genetics. Animal welfare activists capitalized on the widespread sympathy for other animals that Americans exhibited during the post-war years to lobby for legislation to protect animals from systematic cruelties, including those affecting wild animals. They recognized that cruelties to wildlife such as traps and poisons, pesticides, oil spills and other habitat despoliation were also threats to nature more generally and to human quality of life. The combination of science and compassion proved to be a fruitful one for environmentalists because Americans reacted strongly to issues affecting' animals. Sympathy for animals supported and extended ecological arguments, while increased ecological understanding supported arguments in favor of avoiding cruel exploitation of animals. The environmental movement that exploded in the 1960s and 1970s benefited greatly from access to the political strategies and issues developed by humane workers starting in the 1950s. Compassion for other animals thus claimed an important place in the constellation of environmental ethics and politics.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:24:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9955604.pdf: 12796192 bytes, checksum: 1c973f75d96a4f723d38e4b47b3752dc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2000","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 86039 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","287 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2000."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["From Sympathy to Synergy: Humane Activism in the Modern Environmental Movement"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mark Leff"],"dc:creator":["Daitch, Vicki McKinney"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T22:24:28Z","10000-01-01","2000"],"dc:description":["Animal welfare activists contributed both substance and style to the environmental movement that emerged in the years following the Second World War. Women tended to take a more active role than men in humane politics. A loose network of women activists led campaigns to save marine mammals from hunters, predators from traps and poisons, primates from laboratories and birds from pesticides, among many other issues. They explicitly recognized a place for human uses of other animals, but denied that cruelty and outright extirpation was an inescapable and acceptable side effect of such uses. These women relied upon personal connections as well as organizational ones to coordinate programs designed to optimize paths to animal protection, whether through legislative, regulatory or social and cultural changes. Humane workers increasingly turned to science to support their values and their politics, and they were rewarded with new understandings of human/animal relationships through advances in science in every field from ecology and ethology to genetics. Animal welfare activists capitalized on the widespread sympathy for other animals that Americans exhibited during the post-war years to lobby for legislation to protect animals from systematic cruelties, including those affecting wild animals. They recognized that cruelties to wildlife such as traps and poisons, pesticides, oil spills and other habitat despoliation were also threats to nature more generally and to human quality of life. The combination of science and compassion proved to be a fruitful one for environmentalists because Americans reacted strongly to issues affecting' animals. Sympathy for animals supported and extended ecological arguments, while increased ecological understanding supported arguments in favor of avoiding cruel exploitation of animals. The environmental movement that exploded in the 1960s and 1970s benefited greatly from access to the political strategies and issues developed by humane workers starting in the 1950s. Compassion for other animals thus claimed an important place in the constellation of environmental ethics and politics.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:24:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9955604.pdf: 12796192 bytes, checksum: 1c973f75d96a4f723d38e4b47b3752dc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2000","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 86039 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","287 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2000."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84758","(MiAaPQ)AAI9955604"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["History, Modern"],"dc:title":["From Sympathy to Synergy: Humane Activism in the Modern Environmental Movement"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["History"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:23Z"}