{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/84716"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/84716","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Forging a Punishing State: The Punitive Turn in U.S. Criminal and Social Policy, 1968--1980","abstract":"\"This dissertation examines two intertwined recent phenomena: welfare state retrenchment and burgeoning carceral institutions. Through research on seminal struggles over welfare, drug, and criminal sentencing policy, it chronicles a profound shift during the 1970s where programs that championed punishment, expulsion, and retribution supplanted policies that stressed rehabilitation and social reintegration. Specifically, it examines New York's adoption of the nation's harshest drug penalties in the Rockefeller Drug Laws; campaigns in Illinois and California designed to control \"\"welfare abuses\"\" through criminalization and community surveillance; and California's passage of the first major determinate sentencing law, which abandoned rehabilitation as an aim of incarceration. The project explores legislators' motivations for these policies, their fervent public support, and the constrained agency of prisoners, welfare recipients, and drug offenders. These legislative battles served a productive cultural role in rationalizing new economic conditions, demarcating membership in the polity, and redefining state legitimacy and responsibility.\"","abstract_html":""This dissertation examines two intertwined recent phenomena: welfare state retrenchment and burgeoning carceral institutions. Through research on seminal struggles over welfare, drug, and criminal sentencing policy, it chronicles a profound shift during the 1970s where programs that championed punishment, expulsion, and retribution supplanted policies that stressed rehabilitation and social reintegration. Specifically, it examines New York's adoption of the nation's harshest drug penalties in the Rockefeller Drug Laws; campaigns in Illinois and California designed to control ""welfare abuses"" through criminalization and community surveillance; and California's passage of the first major determinate sentencing law, which abandoned rehabilitation as an aim of incarceration. The project explores legislators' motivations for these policies, their fervent public support, and the constrained agency of prisoners, welfare recipients, and drug offenders. These legislative battles served a productive cultural role in rationalizing new economic conditions, demarcating membership in the polity, and redefining state legitimacy and responsibility."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kohler-Hausmann, Julilly"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"History","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mark Leff"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T22:24:09Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T22:24:09Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:23Z","subjects":["Law"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3455763"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3455763","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84716","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mark Leff"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kohler-Hausmann, Julilly"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T22:24:09Z","10000-01-01","2010"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["History"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Law"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84716","(MiAaPQ)AAI3455763"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"This dissertation examines two intertwined recent phenomena: welfare state retrenchment and burgeoning carceral institutions. Through research on seminal struggles over welfare, drug, and criminal sentencing policy, it chronicles a profound shift during the 1970s where programs that championed punishment, expulsion, and retribution supplanted policies that stressed rehabilitation and social reintegration. Specifically, it examines New York's adoption of the nation's harshest drug penalties in the Rockefeller Drug Laws; campaigns in Illinois and California designed to control \"\"welfare abuses\"\" through criminalization and community surveillance; and California's passage of the first major determinate sentencing law, which abandoned rehabilitation as an aim of incarceration. The project explores legislators' motivations for these policies, their fervent public support, and the constrained agency of prisoners, welfare recipients, and drug offenders. These legislative battles served a productive cultural role in rationalizing new economic conditions, demarcating membership in the polity, and redefining state legitimacy and responsibility.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:24:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3455763.pdf: 1817179 bytes, checksum: 5f656275f6490f5f4c55c67793f9e9de (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 85997 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","302 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Forging a Punishing State: The Punitive Turn in U.S. Criminal and Social Policy, 1968--1980"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mark Leff"],"dc:creator":["Kohler-Hausmann, Julilly"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T22:24:09Z","10000-01-01","2010"],"dc:description":["\"This dissertation examines two intertwined recent phenomena: welfare state retrenchment and burgeoning carceral institutions. Through research on seminal struggles over welfare, drug, and criminal sentencing policy, it chronicles a profound shift during the 1970s where programs that championed punishment, expulsion, and retribution supplanted policies that stressed rehabilitation and social reintegration. Specifically, it examines New York's adoption of the nation's harshest drug penalties in the Rockefeller Drug Laws; campaigns in Illinois and California designed to control \"\"welfare abuses\"\" through criminalization and community surveillance; and California's passage of the first major determinate sentencing law, which abandoned rehabilitation as an aim of incarceration. The project explores legislators' motivations for these policies, their fervent public support, and the constrained agency of prisoners, welfare recipients, and drug offenders. These legislative battles served a productive cultural role in rationalizing new economic conditions, demarcating membership in the polity, and redefining state legitimacy and responsibility.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:24:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3455763.pdf: 1817179 bytes, checksum: 5f656275f6490f5f4c55c67793f9e9de (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 85997 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","302 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84716","(MiAaPQ)AAI3455763"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Law"],"dc:title":["Forging a Punishing State: The Punitive Turn in U.S. Criminal and Social Policy, 1968--1980"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["History"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:23Z"}