{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/84640"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/84640","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Double Characters: The Making of American Nationalism in Kentucky, 1792--1833","abstract":"This study investigates how Kentuckians employed nationalism as they negotiated the important political and social issues of the era. As residents of the first state in the trans-Appalachian West, many Kentuckians in the 1790s were antagonistic towards the new federal government to the point of threatening to secede, but they nevertheless proclaimed that such a step would be properly nationalistic. After the election of Thomas Jefferson, both Republicans and Federalists accepted federal authority and worked to define the Union as the embodiment of the nation. Advocates of the War of 1812 saw it as a means of building a national character, but its opponents, prominent among them elite women, asserted that their own rejection of the war was appropriately American. Conflict over the contours of the nation did not end with the coming of peace, as leader Henry Clay's claim that his model of political economy would unify the nation jarred with Kentuckians' observations. Simultaneously, white Kentuckians attempted to construct a racial definition of nationality which excluded Indians and blacks, but Afro-Kentuckians nevertheless related to the ideals of the American Revolution and fought for their application. The South Carolina nullification crisis of 1832--33 opened the door to a new era in which nationalism would become a problematic ideology within Kentucky.","abstract_html":"This study investigates how Kentuckians employed nationalism as they negotiated the important political and social issues of the era. As residents of the first state in the trans-Appalachian West, many Kentuckians in the 1790s were antagonistic towards the new federal government to the point of threatening to secede, but they nevertheless proclaimed that such a step would be properly nationalistic. After the election of Thomas Jefferson, both Republicans and Federalists accepted federal authority and worked to define the Union as the embodiment of the nation. Advocates of the War of 1812 saw it as a means of building a national character, but its opponents, prominent among them elite women, asserted that their own rejection of the war was appropriately American. Conflict over the contours of the nation did not end with the coming of peace, as leader Henry Clay's claim that his model of political economy would unify the nation jarred with Kentuckians' observations. Simultaneously, white Kentuckians attempted to construct a racial definition of nationality which excluded Indians and blacks, but Afro-Kentuckians nevertheless related to the ideals of the American Revolution and fought for their application. The South Carolina nullification crisis of 1832--33 opened the door to a new era in which nationalism would become a problematic ideology within Kentucky.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Asperheim, Stephen"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"History","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["McColley, Robert"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T22:23:42Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T22:23:42Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:23Z","subjects":["History, United States"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3086007"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3086007","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84640","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["McColley, Robert"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Asperheim, Stephen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T22:23:42Z","10000-01-01","2003"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["History"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["History, United States"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84640","(MiAaPQ)AAI3086007"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This study investigates how Kentuckians employed nationalism as they negotiated the important political and social issues of the era. As residents of the first state in the trans-Appalachian West, many Kentuckians in the 1790s were antagonistic towards the new federal government to the point of threatening to secede, but they nevertheless proclaimed that such a step would be properly nationalistic. After the election of Thomas Jefferson, both Republicans and Federalists accepted federal authority and worked to define the Union as the embodiment of the nation. Advocates of the War of 1812 saw it as a means of building a national character, but its opponents, prominent among them elite women, asserted that their own rejection of the war was appropriately American. Conflict over the contours of the nation did not end with the coming of peace, as leader Henry Clay's claim that his model of political economy would unify the nation jarred with Kentuckians' observations. Simultaneously, white Kentuckians attempted to construct a racial definition of nationality which excluded Indians and blacks, but Afro-Kentuckians nevertheless related to the ideals of the American Revolution and fought for their application. The South Carolina nullification crisis of 1832--33 opened the door to a new era in which nationalism would become a problematic ideology within Kentucky.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:23:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3086007.pdf: 19924945 bytes, checksum: a3f65ffcbf3fee70ce5c703e3a795850 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 85921 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","318 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Double Characters: The Making of American Nationalism in Kentucky, 1792--1833"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["McColley, Robert"],"dc:creator":["Asperheim, Stephen"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T22:23:42Z","10000-01-01","2003"],"dc:description":["This study investigates how Kentuckians employed nationalism as they negotiated the important political and social issues of the era. As residents of the first state in the trans-Appalachian West, many Kentuckians in the 1790s were antagonistic towards the new federal government to the point of threatening to secede, but they nevertheless proclaimed that such a step would be properly nationalistic. After the election of Thomas Jefferson, both Republicans and Federalists accepted federal authority and worked to define the Union as the embodiment of the nation. Advocates of the War of 1812 saw it as a means of building a national character, but its opponents, prominent among them elite women, asserted that their own rejection of the war was appropriately American. Conflict over the contours of the nation did not end with the coming of peace, as leader Henry Clay's claim that his model of political economy would unify the nation jarred with Kentuckians' observations. Simultaneously, white Kentuckians attempted to construct a racial definition of nationality which excluded Indians and blacks, but Afro-Kentuckians nevertheless related to the ideals of the American Revolution and fought for their application. The South Carolina nullification crisis of 1832--33 opened the door to a new era in which nationalism would become a problematic ideology within Kentucky.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:23:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3086007.pdf: 19924945 bytes, checksum: a3f65ffcbf3fee70ce5c703e3a795850 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 85921 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","318 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84640","(MiAaPQ)AAI3086007"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["History, United States"],"dc:title":["Double Characters: The Making of American Nationalism in Kentucky, 1792--1833"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["History"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:23Z"}