{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/84521"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/84521","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Counterfactual Thinking: An Underlying Mechanism of Post-Consumption Evaluation and Consumer Satisfaction","abstract":"While marketers strive to satisfy consumers with their products or services, factors outside their control such as malignant consumption environment or misuses by consumers thwart them occasionally. How can marketers minimize consumer dissatisfaction in such cases? Understanding consumers' post-consumption evaluation process is the key to answering this question. To this end, this dissertation proposes a framework of satisfaction determination where counterfactual thinking plays the central role in satisfaction determination. The framework suggests that consumers make counterfactual comparisons in different directions, depending on the situational salience of various comparison standards and their post-consumption evaluation goals. The differences in counterfactual comparisons lead to the differences in satisfaction given the same level of expectation disconfirmation. The results of the four studies in this dissertation indicate that marketers can influence consumers' post-consumption counterfactual thinking process and the resulting satisfaction by offering the right combinations of various marketing mix variables. Specifically, the results showed that, in general, a strict return policy led to greater dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because it prompted more upward counterfactual comparisons. However, when consumers were endowed with high responsibility and freedom during their choice process and the focus of post-consumption evaluation was on their decisions, a strict return policy led to less dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because consumers deliberately sought downward counterfactual comparisons to avoid negative feelings about their decisions.","abstract_html":"While marketers strive to satisfy consumers with their products or services, factors outside their control such as malignant consumption environment or misuses by consumers thwart them occasionally. How can marketers minimize consumer dissatisfaction in such cases? Understanding consumers' post-consumption evaluation process is the key to answering this question. To this end, this dissertation proposes a framework of satisfaction determination where counterfactual thinking plays the central role in satisfaction determination. The framework suggests that consumers make counterfactual comparisons in different directions, depending on the situational salience of various comparison standards and their post-consumption evaluation goals. The differences in counterfactual comparisons lead to the differences in satisfaction given the same level of expectation disconfirmation. The results of the four studies in this dissertation indicate that marketers can influence consumers' post-consumption counterfactual thinking process and the resulting satisfaction by offering the right combinations of various marketing mix variables. Specifically, the results showed that, in general, a strict return policy led to greater dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because it prompted more upward counterfactual comparisons. However, when consumers were endowed with high responsibility and freedom during their choice process and the focus of post-consumption evaluation was on their decisions, a strict return policy led to less dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because consumers deliberately sought downward counterfactual comparisons to avoid negative feelings about their decisions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kim, Junyong"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Business Administration","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Brian C. Wansink"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T22:21:26Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T22:21:26Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:23Z","subjects":["Business Administration, Marketing"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3086098"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3086098","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84521","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Brian C. Wansink"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kim, Junyong"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T22:21:26Z","10000-01-01","2003"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Business Administration"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Business Administration, Marketing"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84521","(MiAaPQ)AAI3086098"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["While marketers strive to satisfy consumers with their products or services, factors outside their control such as malignant consumption environment or misuses by consumers thwart them occasionally. How can marketers minimize consumer dissatisfaction in such cases? Understanding consumers' post-consumption evaluation process is the key to answering this question. To this end, this dissertation proposes a framework of satisfaction determination where counterfactual thinking plays the central role in satisfaction determination. The framework suggests that consumers make counterfactual comparisons in different directions, depending on the situational salience of various comparison standards and their post-consumption evaluation goals. The differences in counterfactual comparisons lead to the differences in satisfaction given the same level of expectation disconfirmation. The results of the four studies in this dissertation indicate that marketers can influence consumers' post-consumption counterfactual thinking process and the resulting satisfaction by offering the right combinations of various marketing mix variables. Specifically, the results showed that, in general, a strict return policy led to greater dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because it prompted more upward counterfactual comparisons. However, when consumers were endowed with high responsibility and freedom during their choice process and the focus of post-consumption evaluation was on their decisions, a strict return policy led to less dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because consumers deliberately sought downward counterfactual comparisons to avoid negative feelings about their decisions.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:21:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3086098.pdf: 10808800 bytes, checksum: 7409b0f5f4ff1328b133ea35a5c9f976 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 85802 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","217 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Counterfactual Thinking: An Underlying Mechanism of Post-Consumption Evaluation and Consumer Satisfaction"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Brian C. Wansink"],"dc:creator":["Kim, Junyong"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T22:21:26Z","10000-01-01","2003"],"dc:description":["While marketers strive to satisfy consumers with their products or services, factors outside their control such as malignant consumption environment or misuses by consumers thwart them occasionally. How can marketers minimize consumer dissatisfaction in such cases? Understanding consumers' post-consumption evaluation process is the key to answering this question. To this end, this dissertation proposes a framework of satisfaction determination where counterfactual thinking plays the central role in satisfaction determination. The framework suggests that consumers make counterfactual comparisons in different directions, depending on the situational salience of various comparison standards and their post-consumption evaluation goals. The differences in counterfactual comparisons lead to the differences in satisfaction given the same level of expectation disconfirmation. The results of the four studies in this dissertation indicate that marketers can influence consumers' post-consumption counterfactual thinking process and the resulting satisfaction by offering the right combinations of various marketing mix variables. Specifically, the results showed that, in general, a strict return policy led to greater dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because it prompted more upward counterfactual comparisons. However, when consumers were endowed with high responsibility and freedom during their choice process and the focus of post-consumption evaluation was on their decisions, a strict return policy led to less dissatisfaction than a liberal return policy because consumers deliberately sought downward counterfactual comparisons to avoid negative feelings about their decisions.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T22:21:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3086098.pdf: 10808800 bytes, checksum: 7409b0f5f4ff1328b133ea35a5c9f976 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 85802 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","217 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/84521","(MiAaPQ)AAI3086098"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Business Administration, Marketing"],"dc:title":["Counterfactual Thinking: An Underlying Mechanism of Post-Consumption Evaluation and Consumer Satisfaction"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Business Administration"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:23Z"}