{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/83030"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/83030","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Regulated HACCP Systems on the Efficiency and Profitability of United States Meat Processing and Packing Sectors","abstract":"Major findings from the survey and the analysis reveal: (1) limited scope of HACCP implementation in the meat industry. Only 14.7% of the respondents have HACCP systems in place, (2) Small firms will incur an average of 2.5 cents per pound of amortized implementation and operating HACCP expenses, (3) The cost structures of all firm categories are non-homothetic. The non-homothetic cost function implies that the quadratic interaction terms between output and input prices are significant economic parameters that must be included in the estimated cost functions, (4) HACCP can reduce other input costs like labor and carcass used, (5) Firms with HACCP systems are more efficient than those without HACCP systems. Finns with HACCP enjoy 18--21% lower labor expenses than firms without HACCP systems. A target MOTAD analysis revealed that firms can realize positive profits with current diverse processes and products with slight variation of the scope of output. The hypothesis that mandatory HACCP systems may negatively affect small firms profitability is not confirmed in this study. HACCP will improve the efficiency of firms in the meat industry.","abstract_html":"Major findings from the survey and the analysis reveal: (1) limited scope of HACCP implementation in the meat industry. Only 14.7% of the respondents have HACCP systems in place, (2) Small firms will incur an average of 2.5 cents per pound of amortized implementation and operating HACCP expenses, (3) The cost structures of all firm categories are non-homothetic. The non-homothetic cost function implies that the quadratic interaction terms between output and input prices are significant economic parameters that must be included in the estimated cost functions, (4) HACCP can reduce other input costs like labor and carcass used, (5) Firms with HACCP systems are more efficient than those without HACCP systems. Finns with HACCP enjoy 18--21% lower labor expenses than firms without HACCP systems. A target MOTAD analysis revealed that firms can realize positive profits with current diverse processes and products with slight variation of the scope of output. The hypothesis that mandatory HACCP systems may negatively affect small firms profitability is not confirmed in this study. HACCP will improve the efficiency of firms in the meat industry.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Nganje, William Evange"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Agricultural Economics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mazzocco, Michael A."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:55:53Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:55:53Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:20Z","subjects":["Economics, Agricultural"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9921717"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9921717","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/83030","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mazzocco, Michael A."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Nganje, William Evange"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:55:53Z","10000-01-01","1999"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Agricultural Economics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Economics, Agricultural"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/83030","(MiAaPQ)AAI9921717"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Major findings from the survey and the analysis reveal: (1) limited scope of HACCP implementation in the meat industry. Only 14.7% of the respondents have HACCP systems in place, (2) Small firms will incur an average of 2.5 cents per pound of amortized implementation and operating HACCP expenses, (3) The cost structures of all firm categories are non-homothetic. The non-homothetic cost function implies that the quadratic interaction terms between output and input prices are significant economic parameters that must be included in the estimated cost functions, (4) HACCP can reduce other input costs like labor and carcass used, (5) Firms with HACCP systems are more efficient than those without HACCP systems. Finns with HACCP enjoy 18--21% lower labor expenses than firms without HACCP systems. A target MOTAD analysis revealed that firms can realize positive profits with current diverse processes and products with slight variation of the scope of output. The hypothesis that mandatory HACCP systems may negatively affect small firms profitability is not confirmed in this study. HACCP will improve the efficiency of firms in the meat industry.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:55:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9921717.pdf: 7645984 bytes, checksum: 78b658abc2755ee3b5510fa2f66655e0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1999","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 84311 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","162 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Assessing the Impact of Regulated HACCP Systems on the Efficiency and Profitability of United States Meat Processing and Packing Sectors"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mazzocco, Michael A."],"dc:creator":["Nganje, William Evange"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:55:53Z","10000-01-01","1999"],"dc:description":["Major findings from the survey and the analysis reveal: (1) limited scope of HACCP implementation in the meat industry. Only 14.7% of the respondents have HACCP systems in place, (2) Small firms will incur an average of 2.5 cents per pound of amortized implementation and operating HACCP expenses, (3) The cost structures of all firm categories are non-homothetic. The non-homothetic cost function implies that the quadratic interaction terms between output and input prices are significant economic parameters that must be included in the estimated cost functions, (4) HACCP can reduce other input costs like labor and carcass used, (5) Firms with HACCP systems are more efficient than those without HACCP systems. Finns with HACCP enjoy 18--21% lower labor expenses than firms without HACCP systems. A target MOTAD analysis revealed that firms can realize positive profits with current diverse processes and products with slight variation of the scope of output. The hypothesis that mandatory HACCP systems may negatively affect small firms profitability is not confirmed in this study. HACCP will improve the efficiency of firms in the meat industry.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:55:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9921717.pdf: 7645984 bytes, checksum: 78b658abc2755ee3b5510fa2f66655e0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1999","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 84311 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","162 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/83030","(MiAaPQ)AAI9921717"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Economics, Agricultural"],"dc:title":["Assessing the Impact of Regulated HACCP Systems on the Efficiency and Profitability of United States Meat Processing and Packing Sectors"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Agricultural Economics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:20Z"}