{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/83007"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/83007","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Essays on Futures Trading Under Non-Standard Assumptions","abstract":"The objective of this dissertation is to investigate more realistic decision-making models and contrast them to the standard utility model in futures markets. Specifically the rationality assumption is relaxed and more reasonable assumptions about agents' decision context are considered in three studies on the behavior of hedgers and traders. Hedging behavior in futures market is investigated by relaxing assumptions related to both expected utility theory and the hedger's decision context, allowing more realistic estimates of hedge ratios. Further, for the first time the behavior of futures and options traders is explored using experiments combined with field data from individual trading records. A general finding of the dissertation is that outcomes from decision-making models based on prospect theory and more realistic assumptions about agents' decision context differ substantially from those produced by expected utility models. Further, outcomes are more consistent with observed behavior. Overall, the research offers new insights on what drives specific dimensions of behavior and how they affect trading performance in futures and options markets.","abstract_html":"The objective of this dissertation is to investigate more realistic decision-making models and contrast them to the standard utility model in futures markets. Specifically the rationality assumption is relaxed and more reasonable assumptions about agents' decision context are considered in three studies on the behavior of hedgers and traders. Hedging behavior in futures market is investigated by relaxing assumptions related to both expected utility theory and the hedger's decision context, allowing more realistic estimates of hedge ratios. Further, for the first time the behavior of futures and options traders is explored using experiments combined with field data from individual trading records. A general finding of the dissertation is that outcomes from decision-making models based on prospect theory and more realistic assumptions about agents' decision context differ substantially from those produced by expected utility models. Further, outcomes are more consistent with observed behavior. Overall, the research offers new insights on what drives specific dimensions of behavior and how they affect trading performance in futures and options markets.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mattos, Fabio Lanhoso"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Agricultural and Consumer Economics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Garcia, Philip"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:55:47Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:55:47Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:20Z","subjects":["Economics, Finance"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3347445"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3347445","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/83007","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Garcia, Philip"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mattos, Fabio Lanhoso"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:55:47Z","10000-01-01","2008"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Agricultural and Consumer Economics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Economics, Finance"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/83007","(MiAaPQ)AAI3347445"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The objective of this dissertation is to investigate more realistic decision-making models and contrast them to the standard utility model in futures markets. Specifically the rationality assumption is relaxed and more reasonable assumptions about agents' decision context are considered in three studies on the behavior of hedgers and traders. Hedging behavior in futures market is investigated by relaxing assumptions related to both expected utility theory and the hedger's decision context, allowing more realistic estimates of hedge ratios. Further, for the first time the behavior of futures and options traders is explored using experiments combined with field data from individual trading records. A general finding of the dissertation is that outcomes from decision-making models based on prospect theory and more realistic assumptions about agents' decision context differ substantially from those produced by expected utility models. Further, outcomes are more consistent with observed behavior. Overall, the research offers new insights on what drives specific dimensions of behavior and how they affect trading performance in futures and options markets.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:55:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3347445.pdf: 1740706 bytes, checksum: 3032b2212e9a818112ff76ffee4c76d0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 84288 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","120 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Essays on Futures Trading Under Non-Standard Assumptions"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Garcia, Philip"],"dc:creator":["Mattos, Fabio Lanhoso"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:55:47Z","10000-01-01","2008"],"dc:description":["The objective of this dissertation is to investigate more realistic decision-making models and contrast them to the standard utility model in futures markets. Specifically the rationality assumption is relaxed and more reasonable assumptions about agents' decision context are considered in three studies on the behavior of hedgers and traders. Hedging behavior in futures market is investigated by relaxing assumptions related to both expected utility theory and the hedger's decision context, allowing more realistic estimates of hedge ratios. Further, for the first time the behavior of futures and options traders is explored using experiments combined with field data from individual trading records. A general finding of the dissertation is that outcomes from decision-making models based on prospect theory and more realistic assumptions about agents' decision context differ substantially from those produced by expected utility models. Further, outcomes are more consistent with observed behavior. Overall, the research offers new insights on what drives specific dimensions of behavior and how they affect trading performance in futures and options markets.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:55:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3347445.pdf: 1740706 bytes, checksum: 3032b2212e9a818112ff76ffee4c76d0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 84288 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","120 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/83007","(MiAaPQ)AAI3347445"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Economics, Finance"],"dc:title":["Essays on Futures Trading Under Non-Standard Assumptions"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Agricultural and Consumer Economics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:20Z"}