{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82635"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82635","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The Syntax and Typology of Bantu Relative Clauses","abstract":"This thesis is concerned with examining and explaining the commonalities and differences found across complementizer-type relative clauses in the Bantu languages, focusing on strong correlations between points of variation. The facts I discuss concern co-variation between agreement in the C-T domain and subject-verb inversion as well as co-variation between object agreement and resumption and complementizer agreement and resumption in object relative clauses. It is argued that agreement variation in the C-T domain can be explained by appeal to universal syntactic principles governing agreement and two morphological parameters that define the location of features in functional heads of clause structure. It is also argued that correlations between agreement and resumption result from differing derivational strategies languages employ to avoid violating general conditions on chain formation. The specific system argued for includes a derivational system of syntax in which only unvalued features are probes, probes are unrestricted with regard to the direction of probing, and the locality of syntactic relations is a dynamic evaluative procedure. Languages discussed include Swahili, Kirundi, Dzamba, Lingala, Zulu, Swati, Chichewa, Shona, Sesotho, and others.","abstract_html":"This thesis is concerned with examining and explaining the commonalities and differences found across complementizer-type relative clauses in the Bantu languages, focusing on strong correlations between points of variation. The facts I discuss concern co-variation between agreement in the C-T domain and subject-verb inversion as well as co-variation between object agreement and resumption and complementizer agreement and resumption in object relative clauses. It is argued that agreement variation in the C-T domain can be explained by appeal to universal syntactic principles governing agreement and two morphological parameters that define the location of features in functional heads of clause structure. It is also argued that correlations between agreement and resumption result from differing derivational strategies languages employ to avoid violating general conditions on chain formation. The specific system argued for includes a derivational system of syntax in which only unvalued features are probes, probes are unrestricted with regard to the direction of probing, and the locality of syntactic relations is a dynamic evaluative procedure. Languages discussed include Swahili, Kirundi, Dzamba, Lingala, Zulu, Swati, Chichewa, Shona, Sesotho, and others.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Henderson, Brent Mykel"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Linguistics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Benmamoun, Elabbas"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:50:49Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:50:49Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:18Z","subjects":["Language, Linguistics"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3242869"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3242869","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82635","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Benmamoun, Elabbas"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Henderson, Brent Mykel"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:50:49Z","10000-01-01","2006"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Linguistics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Language, Linguistics"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82635","(MiAaPQ)AAI3242869"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis is concerned with examining and explaining the commonalities and differences found across complementizer-type relative clauses in the Bantu languages, focusing on strong correlations between points of variation. The facts I discuss concern co-variation between agreement in the C-T domain and subject-verb inversion as well as co-variation between object agreement and resumption and complementizer agreement and resumption in object relative clauses. It is argued that agreement variation in the C-T domain can be explained by appeal to universal syntactic principles governing agreement and two morphological parameters that define the location of features in functional heads of clause structure. It is also argued that correlations between agreement and resumption result from differing derivational strategies languages employ to avoid violating general conditions on chain formation. The specific system argued for includes a derivational system of syntax in which only unvalued features are probes, probes are unrestricted with regard to the direction of probing, and the locality of syntactic relations is a dynamic evaluative procedure. Languages discussed include Swahili, Kirundi, Dzamba, Lingala, Zulu, Swati, Chichewa, Shona, Sesotho, and others.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:50:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3242869.pdf: 5004266 bytes, checksum: fe657e7ed957d5bbadb8aefb9d0f2531 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83916 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","250 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Syntax and Typology of Bantu Relative Clauses"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Benmamoun, Elabbas"],"dc:creator":["Henderson, Brent Mykel"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:50:49Z","10000-01-01","2006"],"dc:description":["This thesis is concerned with examining and explaining the commonalities and differences found across complementizer-type relative clauses in the Bantu languages, focusing on strong correlations between points of variation. The facts I discuss concern co-variation between agreement in the C-T domain and subject-verb inversion as well as co-variation between object agreement and resumption and complementizer agreement and resumption in object relative clauses. It is argued that agreement variation in the C-T domain can be explained by appeal to universal syntactic principles governing agreement and two morphological parameters that define the location of features in functional heads of clause structure. It is also argued that correlations between agreement and resumption result from differing derivational strategies languages employ to avoid violating general conditions on chain formation. The specific system argued for includes a derivational system of syntax in which only unvalued features are probes, probes are unrestricted with regard to the direction of probing, and the locality of syntactic relations is a dynamic evaluative procedure. Languages discussed include Swahili, Kirundi, Dzamba, Lingala, Zulu, Swati, Chichewa, Shona, Sesotho, and others.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:50:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3242869.pdf: 5004266 bytes, checksum: fe657e7ed957d5bbadb8aefb9d0f2531 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83916 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","250 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82635","(MiAaPQ)AAI3242869"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Language, Linguistics"],"dc:title":["The Syntax and Typology of Bantu Relative Clauses"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Linguistics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:18Z"}