{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82630"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82630","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Sentence -Final Particles as Attitude Markers in Mandarin Chinese","abstract":"Chinese sentence-final particles have no denotations (truth-conditional meanings) and thus do not affect the truth condition of the sentences. Therefore, they cannot be treated in truth-conditional semantics. Although their co-occurrence with certain constructions is not random, rules of syntax cannot explain why a sentence with a sentence-final particle is appropriate in one context but not in another context. In order to express and interpret an utterance correctly, in addition to the compositional meaning of the utterance, the speaker and interpreter need to take into consideration pragmatic factors such as presuppositions, beliefs, intentions and goals when inferring the implication(s) of the utterance. It is the speaker's belief and intention, including the speaker's belief about the addressee's belief and intention, that characterize the uses of each sentence-final particle. Differentiations among the particles carrying seemingly similar effects follow as consequences for the general characterizations for the uses of the particles.","abstract_html":"Chinese sentence-final particles have no denotations (truth-conditional meanings) and thus do not affect the truth condition of the sentences. Therefore, they cannot be treated in truth-conditional semantics. Although their co-occurrence with certain constructions is not random, rules of syntax cannot explain why a sentence with a sentence-final particle is appropriate in one context but not in another context. In order to express and interpret an utterance correctly, in addition to the compositional meaning of the utterance, the speaker and interpreter need to take into consideration pragmatic factors such as presuppositions, beliefs, intentions and goals when inferring the implication(s) of the utterance. It is the speaker's belief and intention, including the speaker's belief about the addressee's belief and intention, that characterize the uses of each sentence-final particle. Differentiations among the particles carrying seemingly similar effects follow as consequences for the general characterizations for the uses of the particles.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lu, Wen-Ying"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Linguistics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Green, Georgia M."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:50:46Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:50:46Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:18Z","subjects":["Language, Linguistics"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3199075"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3199075","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82630","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Green, Georgia M."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lu, Wen-Ying"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:50:46Z","10000-01-01","2005"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Linguistics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Language, Linguistics"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82630","(MiAaPQ)AAI3199075"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Chinese sentence-final particles have no denotations (truth-conditional meanings) and thus do not affect the truth condition of the sentences. Therefore, they cannot be treated in truth-conditional semantics. Although their co-occurrence with certain constructions is not random, rules of syntax cannot explain why a sentence with a sentence-final particle is appropriate in one context but not in another context. In order to express and interpret an utterance correctly, in addition to the compositional meaning of the utterance, the speaker and interpreter need to take into consideration pragmatic factors such as presuppositions, beliefs, intentions and goals when inferring the implication(s) of the utterance. It is the speaker's belief and intention, including the speaker's belief about the addressee's belief and intention, that characterize the uses of each sentence-final particle. Differentiations among the particles carrying seemingly similar effects follow as consequences for the general characterizations for the uses of the particles.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:50:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3199075.pdf: 4087029 bytes, checksum: 03f97b52c0ea3e9e92938f0276e780b9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83911 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","170 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2005."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Sentence -Final Particles as Attitude Markers in Mandarin Chinese"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Green, Georgia M."],"dc:creator":["Lu, Wen-Ying"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:50:46Z","10000-01-01","2005"],"dc:description":["Chinese sentence-final particles have no denotations (truth-conditional meanings) and thus do not affect the truth condition of the sentences. Therefore, they cannot be treated in truth-conditional semantics. Although their co-occurrence with certain constructions is not random, rules of syntax cannot explain why a sentence with a sentence-final particle is appropriate in one context but not in another context. In order to express and interpret an utterance correctly, in addition to the compositional meaning of the utterance, the speaker and interpreter need to take into consideration pragmatic factors such as presuppositions, beliefs, intentions and goals when inferring the implication(s) of the utterance. It is the speaker's belief and intention, including the speaker's belief about the addressee's belief and intention, that characterize the uses of each sentence-final particle. Differentiations among the particles carrying seemingly similar effects follow as consequences for the general characterizations for the uses of the particles.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:50:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3199075.pdf: 4087029 bytes, checksum: 03f97b52c0ea3e9e92938f0276e780b9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83911 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","170 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2005."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82630","(MiAaPQ)AAI3199075"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Language, Linguistics"],"dc:title":["Sentence -Final Particles as Attitude Markers in Mandarin Chinese"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Linguistics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:18Z"}