{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82151"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82151","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Negotiable Fate: The Belief, Potential Antecedents and Possible Consequences","abstract":"Past research has suggested that by acknowledging uncontrollability, one relinquishes control. In this dissertation, a re-conceptualization of the relationship between personal agency and uncontrollability is proposed. Rather than pitting control against helplessness, it is argued that individuals can acknowledge uncontrollability and still initiate personal actions to protect their interests. This idea is reflected in the belief in negotiable fate---the belief that personal actions and fate work together to determine personal outcomes. The goals of the research presented in this dissertation are fourfold. First, the results of Study 1 highlighted the unique contributions of negotiable fate by establishing that negotiable fate is a fate belief that is qualitatively different from both conquerable fate (the belief that personal actions have ultimate authority over outcomes) and insurmountable fate (the belief that the paths set by fate cannot be changed by personal actions). Second, Studies 2a and 2b explored the societal-level factors that are conducive to the development of the belief in negotiable fate. Results suggest that the belief in negotiable fate is most prevalent when individuals are encouraged to attain desired personal goals, but rigid constraints are placed on the pursuit of these goals. Third, Study 3 examined whether the interpretation of the concept of negotiable fate differs across individuals as a function of the societal-level factors examined in Studies 2a and 2b. The results of Study 3 suggest that the more constraints an individual faces, the more he/she focuses on the agentic aspect of negotiable fate. Lastly, Study 4 investigated the consequences of the belief in negotiable fate, and the findings suggest that when the belief in negotiable fate is primed, feeling lucky or unlucky can inform decision-making in systematic ways. Implications and future directions were discussed.","abstract_html":"Past research has suggested that by acknowledging uncontrollability, one relinquishes control. In this dissertation, a re-conceptualization of the relationship between personal agency and uncontrollability is proposed. Rather than pitting control against helplessness, it is argued that individuals can acknowledge uncontrollability and still initiate personal actions to protect their interests. This idea is reflected in the belief in negotiable fate---the belief that personal actions and fate work together to determine personal outcomes. The goals of the research presented in this dissertation are fourfold. First, the results of Study 1 highlighted the unique contributions of negotiable fate by establishing that negotiable fate is a fate belief that is qualitatively different from both conquerable fate (the belief that personal actions have ultimate authority over outcomes) and insurmountable fate (the belief that the paths set by fate cannot be changed by personal actions). Second, Studies 2a and 2b explored the societal-level factors that are conducive to the development of the belief in negotiable fate. Results suggest that the belief in negotiable fate is most prevalent when individuals are encouraged to attain desired personal goals, but rigid constraints are placed on the pursuit of these goals. Third, Study 3 examined whether the interpretation of the concept of negotiable fate differs across individuals as a function of the societal-level factors examined in Studies 2a and 2b. The results of Study 3 suggest that the more constraints an individual faces, the more he/she focuses on the agentic aspect of negotiable fate. Lastly, Study 4 investigated the consequences of the belief in negotiable fate, and the findings suggest that when the belief in negotiable fate is primed, feeling lucky or unlucky can inform decision-making in systematic ways. Implications and future directions were discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Au, Evelyn Wing Mun"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Chiu, Chi-Yue"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:39:22Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:39:22Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z","subjects":["Psychology, Cognitive"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3314726"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3314726","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82151","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Chiu, Chi-Yue"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Au, Evelyn Wing Mun"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:39:22Z","10000-01-01","2008"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Cognitive"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82151","(MiAaPQ)AAI3314726"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Past research has suggested that by acknowledging uncontrollability, one relinquishes control. In this dissertation, a re-conceptualization of the relationship between personal agency and uncontrollability is proposed. Rather than pitting control against helplessness, it is argued that individuals can acknowledge uncontrollability and still initiate personal actions to protect their interests. This idea is reflected in the belief in negotiable fate---the belief that personal actions and fate work together to determine personal outcomes. The goals of the research presented in this dissertation are fourfold. First, the results of Study 1 highlighted the unique contributions of negotiable fate by establishing that negotiable fate is a fate belief that is qualitatively different from both conquerable fate (the belief that personal actions have ultimate authority over outcomes) and insurmountable fate (the belief that the paths set by fate cannot be changed by personal actions). Second, Studies 2a and 2b explored the societal-level factors that are conducive to the development of the belief in negotiable fate. Results suggest that the belief in negotiable fate is most prevalent when individuals are encouraged to attain desired personal goals, but rigid constraints are placed on the pursuit of these goals. Third, Study 3 examined whether the interpretation of the concept of negotiable fate differs across individuals as a function of the societal-level factors examined in Studies 2a and 2b. The results of Study 3 suggest that the more constraints an individual faces, the more he/she focuses on the agentic aspect of negotiable fate. Lastly, Study 4 investigated the consequences of the belief in negotiable fate, and the findings suggest that when the belief in negotiable fate is primed, feeling lucky or unlucky can inform decision-making in systematic ways. Implications and future directions were discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:39:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3314726.pdf: 768681 bytes, checksum: cecf8ae7357d39d8efd0082aa8b573b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83432 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","57 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Negotiable Fate: The Belief, Potential Antecedents and Possible Consequences"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Chiu, Chi-Yue"],"dc:creator":["Au, Evelyn Wing Mun"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:39:22Z","10000-01-01","2008"],"dc:description":["Past research has suggested that by acknowledging uncontrollability, one relinquishes control. In this dissertation, a re-conceptualization of the relationship between personal agency and uncontrollability is proposed. Rather than pitting control against helplessness, it is argued that individuals can acknowledge uncontrollability and still initiate personal actions to protect their interests. This idea is reflected in the belief in negotiable fate---the belief that personal actions and fate work together to determine personal outcomes. The goals of the research presented in this dissertation are fourfold. First, the results of Study 1 highlighted the unique contributions of negotiable fate by establishing that negotiable fate is a fate belief that is qualitatively different from both conquerable fate (the belief that personal actions have ultimate authority over outcomes) and insurmountable fate (the belief that the paths set by fate cannot be changed by personal actions). Second, Studies 2a and 2b explored the societal-level factors that are conducive to the development of the belief in negotiable fate. Results suggest that the belief in negotiable fate is most prevalent when individuals are encouraged to attain desired personal goals, but rigid constraints are placed on the pursuit of these goals. Third, Study 3 examined whether the interpretation of the concept of negotiable fate differs across individuals as a function of the societal-level factors examined in Studies 2a and 2b. The results of Study 3 suggest that the more constraints an individual faces, the more he/she focuses on the agentic aspect of negotiable fate. Lastly, Study 4 investigated the consequences of the belief in negotiable fate, and the findings suggest that when the belief in negotiable fate is primed, feeling lucky or unlucky can inform decision-making in systematic ways. Implications and future directions were discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:39:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3314726.pdf: 768681 bytes, checksum: cecf8ae7357d39d8efd0082aa8b573b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83432 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","57 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82151","(MiAaPQ)AAI3314726"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Cognitive"],"dc:title":["Negotiable Fate: The Belief, Potential Antecedents and Possible Consequences"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z"}