{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82113"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82113","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The Influence of Time on the Prediction of Performance","abstract":"There is a mounting literature substantiating the importance of both cognitive ability and conscientiousness as valid predictors of job performance across job domains (e.g., Barrick & Mount, 1991; Hogan & Ones, 1997; Hunter & Hunter, 1984; Schmidt & Hunter, 1998); however, relatively little is known about the predictive validity of these factors over time where time reflects tenure on a job or trials on a task. The minimal research suggests that validities of cognitive ability decrease over time (e.g., Henry & Hulin, 1987; Hulin, Henry, & Noon, 1990; Keil, & Cortina, 2001). Practically nothing is known about personality and performance relations over time. This project was designed to study longitudinally the relationships of cognitive ability and conscientiousness with performance to investigate the possible dynamic nature of these relationships. I posited that, unlike cognitive ability, the relationship between performance and conscientiousness will increase over time for consistent tasks, such that the correlation will become increasingly larger in magnitude and positive in direction over trials. The reasoning is that when a task is new, learning must occur, which will be a function of cognitive ability; but the importance of personality will surface once the task has been learned. A pilot study provided initial support for these predictions, and the main study investigated them further. Results revealed that conscientiousness did not become positively correlated with performance over trials; however, the findings suggest that this relationship may emerge over many more trials. Implications and future directions are discussed.","abstract_html":"There is a mounting literature substantiating the importance of both cognitive ability and conscientiousness as valid predictors of job performance across job domains (e.g., Barrick & Mount, 1991; Hogan & Ones, 1997; Hunter & Hunter, 1984; Schmidt & Hunter, 1998); however, relatively little is known about the predictive validity of these factors over time where time reflects tenure on a job or trials on a task. The minimal research suggests that validities of cognitive ability decrease over time (e.g., Henry & Hulin, 1987; Hulin, Henry, & Noon, 1990; Keil, & Cortina, 2001). Practically nothing is known about personality and performance relations over time. This project was designed to study longitudinally the relationships of cognitive ability and conscientiousness with performance to investigate the possible dynamic nature of these relationships. I posited that, unlike cognitive ability, the relationship between performance and conscientiousness will increase over time for consistent tasks, such that the correlation will become increasingly larger in magnitude and positive in direction over trials. The reasoning is that when a task is new, learning must occur, which will be a function of cognitive ability; but the importance of personality will surface once the task has been learned. A pilot study provided initial support for these predictions, and the main study investigated them further. Results revealed that conscientiousness did not become positively correlated with performance over trials; however, the findings suggest that this relationship may emerge over many more trials. Implications and future directions are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Burrus, Krista Dervan"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Drasgow, Fritz"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:39:14Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:39:14Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z","subjects":["Psychology, Industrial"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3242804"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3242804","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82113","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Drasgow, Fritz"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Burrus, Krista Dervan"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:39:14Z","10000-01-01","2006"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Industrial"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82113","(MiAaPQ)AAI3242804"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["There is a mounting literature substantiating the importance of both cognitive ability and conscientiousness as valid predictors of job performance across job domains (e.g., Barrick & Mount, 1991; Hogan & Ones, 1997; Hunter & Hunter, 1984; Schmidt & Hunter, 1998); however, relatively little is known about the predictive validity of these factors over time where time reflects tenure on a job or trials on a task. The minimal research suggests that validities of cognitive ability decrease over time (e.g., Henry & Hulin, 1987; Hulin, Henry, & Noon, 1990; Keil, & Cortina, 2001). Practically nothing is known about personality and performance relations over time. This project was designed to study longitudinally the relationships of cognitive ability and conscientiousness with performance to investigate the possible dynamic nature of these relationships. I posited that, unlike cognitive ability, the relationship between performance and conscientiousness will increase over time for consistent tasks, such that the correlation will become increasingly larger in magnitude and positive in direction over trials. The reasoning is that when a task is new, learning must occur, which will be a function of cognitive ability; but the importance of personality will surface once the task has been learned. A pilot study provided initial support for these predictions, and the main study investigated them further. Results revealed that conscientiousness did not become positively correlated with performance over trials; however, the findings suggest that this relationship may emerge over many more trials. Implications and future directions are discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:39:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3242804.pdf: 1986848 bytes, checksum: d8b4b6e9596f0925791ad4be238d4a22 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83394 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","78 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Influence of Time on the Prediction of Performance"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Drasgow, Fritz"],"dc:creator":["Burrus, Krista Dervan"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:39:14Z","10000-01-01","2006"],"dc:description":["There is a mounting literature substantiating the importance of both cognitive ability and conscientiousness as valid predictors of job performance across job domains (e.g., Barrick & Mount, 1991; Hogan & Ones, 1997; Hunter & Hunter, 1984; Schmidt & Hunter, 1998); however, relatively little is known about the predictive validity of these factors over time where time reflects tenure on a job or trials on a task. The minimal research suggests that validities of cognitive ability decrease over time (e.g., Henry & Hulin, 1987; Hulin, Henry, & Noon, 1990; Keil, & Cortina, 2001). Practically nothing is known about personality and performance relations over time. This project was designed to study longitudinally the relationships of cognitive ability and conscientiousness with performance to investigate the possible dynamic nature of these relationships. I posited that, unlike cognitive ability, the relationship between performance and conscientiousness will increase over time for consistent tasks, such that the correlation will become increasingly larger in magnitude and positive in direction over trials. The reasoning is that when a task is new, learning must occur, which will be a function of cognitive ability; but the importance of personality will surface once the task has been learned. A pilot study provided initial support for these predictions, and the main study investigated them further. Results revealed that conscientiousness did not become positively correlated with performance over trials; however, the findings suggest that this relationship may emerge over many more trials. Implications and future directions are discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:39:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3242804.pdf: 1986848 bytes, checksum: d8b4b6e9596f0925791ad4be238d4a22 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83394 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","78 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2006."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82113","(MiAaPQ)AAI3242804"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Industrial"],"dc:title":["The Influence of Time on the Prediction of Performance"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z"}