{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82055"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82055","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"An Individual Differences Approach to Emotion Regulation Using a Neuropsychological Model of Approach and Avoidance Temperament","abstract":"In this research, the relationships between approach and avoidance temperament, patterns of anterior brain asymmetry, situational strategies (suppression and cognitive reappraisal) to regulate negative emotion, and the outcomes of these strategies on emotion processes were examined. Two studies were conducted. Study 1 (N = 318) represents a replication of Elliot's and Thrash's (2002) finding that approach and avoidance temperament are latent personality variables that capture shared variance across the constructs of extraversion, positive temperament, and behavioral activation and the constructs of neuroticism, negative temperament, and behavioral inhibition, respectively. In Study 2 (N = 141), emotional responses of approach and avoidance temperament individuals to a situational stressor were measured in the experiential domain through self-report, in the behavioral domain through facial affective coding, and in the neuroendocrine domain through assessment of salivary cortisol levels. Results showed an interaction between temperament type and type of emotion regulation strategy such that approach temperament individuals used reappraisal advantageously to reduce degree of emotional reactivity. Avoidance temperament participants were more adept in using suppression to achieve the same results. Neuropsychological testing was also conducted in Study 2 to determine if temperament type was related to patterns of anterior brain asymmetry. Results indicated that approach-biased participants outperformed avoidance-biased participants on left frontal lobe tests (Tower of London, Verbal Fluency Test, Digit Span Test) and, conversely, that avoidance-biased participants excelled on right frontal lobe tests (Continuous Performance Test, Ruff Figural Fluency Test, Spatial Span Test). An analysis of brain asymmetry bias, as reflected in differences in neuropsychological profiles, and the effects of emotion regulation instructions on emotional outcomes yielded mixed results. Finally, it was found that patterns of neuropsychological asymmetry did not mediate the relationships between temperament and emotional outcome for either temperament group. The importance of examining temperament type and patterns of anterior brain asymmetry as individual difference variables in the study of emotion regulation effectiveness is discussed. Clinical and theoretical applications for these findings are also highlighted.","abstract_html":"In this research, the relationships between approach and avoidance temperament, patterns of anterior brain asymmetry, situational strategies (suppression and cognitive reappraisal) to regulate negative emotion, and the outcomes of these strategies on emotion processes were examined. Two studies were conducted. Study 1 (N = 318) represents a replication of Elliot's and Thrash's (2002) finding that approach and avoidance temperament are latent personality variables that capture shared variance across the constructs of extraversion, positive temperament, and behavioral activation and the constructs of neuroticism, negative temperament, and behavioral inhibition, respectively. In Study 2 (N = 141), emotional responses of approach and avoidance temperament individuals to a situational stressor were measured in the experiential domain through self-report, in the behavioral domain through facial affective coding, and in the neuroendocrine domain through assessment of salivary cortisol levels. Results showed an interaction between temperament type and type of emotion regulation strategy such that approach temperament individuals used reappraisal advantageously to reduce degree of emotional reactivity. Avoidance temperament participants were more adept in using suppression to achieve the same results. Neuropsychological testing was also conducted in Study 2 to determine if temperament type was related to patterns of anterior brain asymmetry. Results indicated that approach-biased participants outperformed avoidance-biased participants on left frontal lobe tests (Tower of London, Verbal Fluency Test, Digit Span Test) and, conversely, that avoidance-biased participants excelled on right frontal lobe tests (Continuous Performance Test, Ruff Figural Fluency Test, Spatial Span Test). An analysis of brain asymmetry bias, as reflected in differences in neuropsychological profiles, and the effects of emotion regulation instructions on emotional outcomes yielded mixed results. Finally, it was found that patterns of neuropsychological asymmetry did not mediate the relationships between temperament and emotional outcome for either temperament group. The importance of examining temperament type and patterns of anterior brain asymmetry as individual difference variables in the study of emotion regulation effectiveness is discussed. Clinical and theoretical applications for these findings are also highlighted.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Koven, Nancy S."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Heller, Wendy"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:38:56Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:38:56Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z","subjects":["Psychology, Clinical"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3130959"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3130959","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82055","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Heller, Wendy"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Koven, Nancy S."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:38:56Z","10000-01-01","2004"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Clinical"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82055","(MiAaPQ)AAI3130959"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["In this research, the relationships between approach and avoidance temperament, patterns of anterior brain asymmetry, situational strategies (suppression and cognitive reappraisal) to regulate negative emotion, and the outcomes of these strategies on emotion processes were examined. Two studies were conducted. Study 1 (N = 318) represents a replication of Elliot's and Thrash's (2002) finding that approach and avoidance temperament are latent personality variables that capture shared variance across the constructs of extraversion, positive temperament, and behavioral activation and the constructs of neuroticism, negative temperament, and behavioral inhibition, respectively. In Study 2 (N = 141), emotional responses of approach and avoidance temperament individuals to a situational stressor were measured in the experiential domain through self-report, in the behavioral domain through facial affective coding, and in the neuroendocrine domain through assessment of salivary cortisol levels. Results showed an interaction between temperament type and type of emotion regulation strategy such that approach temperament individuals used reappraisal advantageously to reduce degree of emotional reactivity. Avoidance temperament participants were more adept in using suppression to achieve the same results. Neuropsychological testing was also conducted in Study 2 to determine if temperament type was related to patterns of anterior brain asymmetry. Results indicated that approach-biased participants outperformed avoidance-biased participants on left frontal lobe tests (Tower of London, Verbal Fluency Test, Digit Span Test) and, conversely, that avoidance-biased participants excelled on right frontal lobe tests (Continuous Performance Test, Ruff Figural Fluency Test, Spatial Span Test). An analysis of brain asymmetry bias, as reflected in differences in neuropsychological profiles, and the effects of emotion regulation instructions on emotional outcomes yielded mixed results. Finally, it was found that patterns of neuropsychological asymmetry did not mediate the relationships between temperament and emotional outcome for either temperament group. The importance of examining temperament type and patterns of anterior brain asymmetry as individual difference variables in the study of emotion regulation effectiveness is discussed. Clinical and theoretical applications for these findings are also highlighted.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:38:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3130959.pdf: 5757110 bytes, checksum: cfe069c03028b986d07617c87ef8fcb8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83336 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","104 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["An Individual Differences Approach to Emotion Regulation Using a Neuropsychological Model of Approach and Avoidance Temperament"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Heller, Wendy"],"dc:creator":["Koven, Nancy S."],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:38:56Z","10000-01-01","2004"],"dc:description":["In this research, the relationships between approach and avoidance temperament, patterns of anterior brain asymmetry, situational strategies (suppression and cognitive reappraisal) to regulate negative emotion, and the outcomes of these strategies on emotion processes were examined. Two studies were conducted. Study 1 (N = 318) represents a replication of Elliot's and Thrash's (2002) finding that approach and avoidance temperament are latent personality variables that capture shared variance across the constructs of extraversion, positive temperament, and behavioral activation and the constructs of neuroticism, negative temperament, and behavioral inhibition, respectively. In Study 2 (N = 141), emotional responses of approach and avoidance temperament individuals to a situational stressor were measured in the experiential domain through self-report, in the behavioral domain through facial affective coding, and in the neuroendocrine domain through assessment of salivary cortisol levels. Results showed an interaction between temperament type and type of emotion regulation strategy such that approach temperament individuals used reappraisal advantageously to reduce degree of emotional reactivity. Avoidance temperament participants were more adept in using suppression to achieve the same results. Neuropsychological testing was also conducted in Study 2 to determine if temperament type was related to patterns of anterior brain asymmetry. Results indicated that approach-biased participants outperformed avoidance-biased participants on left frontal lobe tests (Tower of London, Verbal Fluency Test, Digit Span Test) and, conversely, that avoidance-biased participants excelled on right frontal lobe tests (Continuous Performance Test, Ruff Figural Fluency Test, Spatial Span Test). An analysis of brain asymmetry bias, as reflected in differences in neuropsychological profiles, and the effects of emotion regulation instructions on emotional outcomes yielded mixed results. Finally, it was found that patterns of neuropsychological asymmetry did not mediate the relationships between temperament and emotional outcome for either temperament group. The importance of examining temperament type and patterns of anterior brain asymmetry as individual difference variables in the study of emotion regulation effectiveness is discussed. Clinical and theoretical applications for these findings are also highlighted.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:38:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3130959.pdf: 5757110 bytes, checksum: cfe069c03028b986d07617c87ef8fcb8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83336 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","104 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82055","(MiAaPQ)AAI3130959"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Clinical"],"dc:title":["An Individual Differences Approach to Emotion Regulation Using a Neuropsychological Model of Approach and Avoidance Temperament"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z"}