{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82054"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82054","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"When You Are Blue, Less Is True: The Impact of Affect on Validity Judgments","abstract":"It is proposed that people associate validity with positivity and invalidity with negativity and that these associations make people more likely to judge information to be valid when experiencing positive affect than when experiencing negative affect. In Experiment l, participants' responses on an Implicit Association Test (IAT) demonstrated strong associations between positivity and validity and between negativity and invalidity. In Experiment 2, participants primed with positive affect were more likely than participants primed with negative affect to assess statements as valid. This experiment also suggests that an affect-priming mechanism is responsible for the impact of affect on validity judgments. The implications of these findings for self-serving judgments and for processing fluency phenomena are discussed.","abstract_html":"It is proposed that people associate validity with positivity and invalidity with negativity and that these associations make people more likely to judge information to be valid when experiencing positive affect than when experiencing negative affect. In Experiment l, participants' responses on an Implicit Association Test (IAT) demonstrated strong associations between positivity and validity and between negativity and invalidity. In Experiment 2, participants primed with positive affect were more likely than participants primed with negative affect to assess statements as valid. This experiment also suggests that an affect-priming mechanism is responsible for the impact of affect on validity judgments. The implications of these findings for self-serving judgments and for processing fluency phenomena are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Evans, Ralph Matthew"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Justin Kruger"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:38:55Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:38:55Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z","subjects":["Psychology, Social"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3130913"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3130913","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82054","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Justin Kruger"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Evans, Ralph Matthew"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:38:55Z","10000-01-01","2004"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Social"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82054","(MiAaPQ)AAI3130913"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["It is proposed that people associate validity with positivity and invalidity with negativity and that these associations make people more likely to judge information to be valid when experiencing positive affect than when experiencing negative affect. In Experiment l, participants' responses on an Implicit Association Test (IAT) demonstrated strong associations between positivity and validity and between negativity and invalidity. In Experiment 2, participants primed with positive affect were more likely than participants primed with negative affect to assess statements as valid. This experiment also suggests that an affect-priming mechanism is responsible for the impact of affect on validity judgments. The implications of these findings for self-serving judgments and for processing fluency phenomena are discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:38:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3130913.pdf: 3860101 bytes, checksum: 7d7b9c6a97b52a8667899bdfdbc4f248 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83335 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","69 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["When You Are Blue, Less Is True: The Impact of Affect on Validity Judgments"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Justin Kruger"],"dc:creator":["Evans, Ralph Matthew"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:38:55Z","10000-01-01","2004"],"dc:description":["It is proposed that people associate validity with positivity and invalidity with negativity and that these associations make people more likely to judge information to be valid when experiencing positive affect than when experiencing negative affect. In Experiment l, participants' responses on an Implicit Association Test (IAT) demonstrated strong associations between positivity and validity and between negativity and invalidity. In Experiment 2, participants primed with positive affect were more likely than participants primed with negative affect to assess statements as valid. This experiment also suggests that an affect-priming mechanism is responsible for the impact of affect on validity judgments. The implications of these findings for self-serving judgments and for processing fluency phenomena are discussed.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:38:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3130913.pdf: 3860101 bytes, checksum: 7d7b9c6a97b52a8667899bdfdbc4f248 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83335 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","69 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82054","(MiAaPQ)AAI3130913"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Social"],"dc:title":["When You Are Blue, Less Is True: The Impact of Affect on Validity Judgments"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z"}