{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82018"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/82018","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Phonetic Features in Language Production: An Experimental Examination of Phonetic Feature Errors","abstract":"While many studies have examined the behavior of phonemes in experimentally elicited speech errors (e.g. Baars & Motley, 1976; Butterworth & Whittaker, 1980; Dell, 1986; Dell, Reed, Adams, & Meyer, 2000; Stemberger, 1991), none have looked at unambiguous phonetic feature errors in speech error experiments. To date, examinations of feature errors and what such errors tell us about the function of phonetic features in language planning have come from examinations of naturally occurring speech error corpora (Shattuck-Hufnagel & Klatt, 1979, Stemberger, 1982). Four experiments were conducted to examine unambiguous feature errors in error elicitation tasks. Considerably more feature errors were produced than would be expected based on naturally occurring errors or current theories of language production. Analyses comparing the behavior of the phoneme and feature errors found that feature errors behave very similarly to phoneme errors. A proposal of how models of language production could accommodate these findings is made.","abstract_html":"While many studies have examined the behavior of phonemes in experimentally elicited speech errors (e.g. Baars & Motley, 1976; Butterworth & Whittaker, 1980; Dell, 1986; Dell, Reed, Adams, & Meyer, 2000; Stemberger, 1991), none have looked at unambiguous phonetic feature errors in speech error experiments. To date, examinations of feature errors and what such errors tell us about the function of phonetic features in language planning have come from examinations of naturally occurring speech error corpora (Shattuck-Hufnagel & Klatt, 1979, Stemberger, 1982). Four experiments were conducted to examine unambiguous feature errors in error elicitation tasks. Considerably more feature errors were produced than would be expected based on naturally occurring errors or current theories of language production. Analyses comparing the behavior of the phoneme and feature errors found that feature errors behave very similarly to phoneme errors. A proposal of how models of language production could accommodate these findings is made.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Guest, Daniel James"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dell, Gary S."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:38:44Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:38:44Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z","subjects":["Language, Linguistics"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3044098"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3044098","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82018","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dell, Gary S."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Guest, Daniel James"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:38:44Z","10000-01-01","2002"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Language, Linguistics"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82018","(MiAaPQ)AAI3044098"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["While many studies have examined the behavior of phonemes in experimentally elicited speech errors (e.g. Baars & Motley, 1976; Butterworth & Whittaker, 1980; Dell, 1986; Dell, Reed, Adams, & Meyer, 2000; Stemberger, 1991), none have looked at unambiguous phonetic feature errors in speech error experiments. To date, examinations of feature errors and what such errors tell us about the function of phonetic features in language planning have come from examinations of naturally occurring speech error corpora (Shattuck-Hufnagel & Klatt, 1979, Stemberger, 1982). Four experiments were conducted to examine unambiguous feature errors in error elicitation tasks. Considerably more feature errors were produced than would be expected based on naturally occurring errors or current theories of language production. Analyses comparing the behavior of the phoneme and feature errors found that feature errors behave very similarly to phoneme errors. A proposal of how models of language production could accommodate these findings is made.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:38:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3044098.pdf: 4397697 bytes, checksum: 642827350a1205310716d05cdc61da5e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2002","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83299 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","99 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2002."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Phonetic Features in Language Production: An Experimental Examination of Phonetic Feature Errors"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dell, Gary S."],"dc:creator":["Guest, Daniel James"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:38:44Z","10000-01-01","2002"],"dc:description":["While many studies have examined the behavior of phonemes in experimentally elicited speech errors (e.g. Baars & Motley, 1976; Butterworth & Whittaker, 1980; Dell, 1986; Dell, Reed, Adams, & Meyer, 2000; Stemberger, 1991), none have looked at unambiguous phonetic feature errors in speech error experiments. To date, examinations of feature errors and what such errors tell us about the function of phonetic features in language planning have come from examinations of naturally occurring speech error corpora (Shattuck-Hufnagel & Klatt, 1979, Stemberger, 1982). Four experiments were conducted to examine unambiguous feature errors in error elicitation tasks. Considerably more feature errors were produced than would be expected based on naturally occurring errors or current theories of language production. Analyses comparing the behavior of the phoneme and feature errors found that feature errors behave very similarly to phoneme errors. A proposal of how models of language production could accommodate these findings is made.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:38:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3044098.pdf: 4397697 bytes, checksum: 642827350a1205310716d05cdc61da5e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2002","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 83299 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","99 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2002."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/82018","(MiAaPQ)AAI3044098"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Language, Linguistics"],"dc:title":["Phonetic Features in Language Production: An Experimental Examination of Phonetic Feature Errors"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:17Z"}