{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81496"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81496","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The Sublime and the Dutiful: Ethics and Excess From Edwards to Melville","abstract":"Especially since Kant, the sublime has been formulated as a subjective, interior experience, the practical effects of which bear out equivalently ego-centric---or, in the historical sense, nation-specific---interests. But that conception of sublimity, whether derived from Kant or the empirical approach exemplified by Edmund Burke, represents but one, transcendent version of the category: a version that derives its force from a subject's ability to recover itself at a level beyond that at which it is threatened. If, however, we take as the basis of the sublime that threat to a subject's integrity, there exist at least two additional experiences of the category: one in which a subject immanently dissolves into something larger than itself, and another in which it ecstatically stands out from itself, and toward another. Each of these versions of the sublime---transcendent, immanent, and ecstatic---bears its own ethical implications. We can see these implications illustrated and evaluated within the work of such early American authors as Jonathan Edwards, Charles Brockden Brown, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Edgar Allan Poe, and Herman Melville. Each, in his own way, shows how the sublime can be dutiful---how it can constitute not one self's recovered and isolated sense of itself, but rather its constitutive connection to others.","abstract_html":"Especially since Kant, the sublime has been formulated as a subjective, interior experience, the practical effects of which bear out equivalently ego-centric---or, in the historical sense, nation-specific---interests. But that conception of sublimity, whether derived from Kant or the empirical approach exemplified by Edmund Burke, represents but one, transcendent version of the category: a version that derives its force from a subject's ability to recover itself at a level beyond that at which it is threatened. If, however, we take as the basis of the sublime that threat to a subject's integrity, there exist at least two additional experiences of the category: one in which a subject immanently dissolves into something larger than itself, and another in which it ecstatically stands out from itself, and toward another. Each of these versions of the sublime---transcendent, immanent, and ecstatic---bears its own ethical implications. We can see these implications illustrated and evaluated within the work of such early American authors as Jonathan Edwards, Charles Brockden Brown, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Edgar Allan Poe, and Herman Melville. Each, in his own way, shows how the sublime can be dutiful---how it can constitute not one self's recovered and isolated sense of itself, but rather its constitutive connection to others.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Vaughn, William Martin"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"English","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Baym, Nina"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:15:43Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:15:43Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z","subjects":["Literature, American"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9912407"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9912407","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81496","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Baym, Nina"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Vaughn, William Martin"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:15:43Z","10000-01-01","1998"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Literature, American"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81496","(MiAaPQ)AAI9912407"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Especially since Kant, the sublime has been formulated as a subjective, interior experience, the practical effects of which bear out equivalently ego-centric---or, in the historical sense, nation-specific---interests. But that conception of sublimity, whether derived from Kant or the empirical approach exemplified by Edmund Burke, represents but one, transcendent version of the category: a version that derives its force from a subject's ability to recover itself at a level beyond that at which it is threatened. If, however, we take as the basis of the sublime that threat to a subject's integrity, there exist at least two additional experiences of the category: one in which a subject immanently dissolves into something larger than itself, and another in which it ecstatically stands out from itself, and toward another. Each of these versions of the sublime---transcendent, immanent, and ecstatic---bears its own ethical implications. We can see these implications illustrated and evaluated within the work of such early American authors as Jonathan Edwards, Charles Brockden Brown, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Edgar Allan Poe, and Herman Melville. Each, in his own way, shows how the sublime can be dutiful---how it can constitute not one self's recovered and isolated sense of itself, but rather its constitutive connection to others.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9912407.pdf: 15121054 bytes, checksum: 41982a420e36b934627dae4e1db20c21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1998","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82777 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","333 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Sublime and the Dutiful: Ethics and Excess From Edwards to Melville"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Baym, Nina"],"dc:creator":["Vaughn, William Martin"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:15:43Z","10000-01-01","1998"],"dc:description":["Especially since Kant, the sublime has been formulated as a subjective, interior experience, the practical effects of which bear out equivalently ego-centric---or, in the historical sense, nation-specific---interests. But that conception of sublimity, whether derived from Kant or the empirical approach exemplified by Edmund Burke, represents but one, transcendent version of the category: a version that derives its force from a subject's ability to recover itself at a level beyond that at which it is threatened. If, however, we take as the basis of the sublime that threat to a subject's integrity, there exist at least two additional experiences of the category: one in which a subject immanently dissolves into something larger than itself, and another in which it ecstatically stands out from itself, and toward another. Each of these versions of the sublime---transcendent, immanent, and ecstatic---bears its own ethical implications. We can see these implications illustrated and evaluated within the work of such early American authors as Jonathan Edwards, Charles Brockden Brown, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Edgar Allan Poe, and Herman Melville. Each, in his own way, shows how the sublime can be dutiful---how it can constitute not one self's recovered and isolated sense of itself, but rather its constitutive connection to others.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9912407.pdf: 15121054 bytes, checksum: 41982a420e36b934627dae4e1db20c21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1998","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82777 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","333 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81496","(MiAaPQ)AAI9912407"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Literature, American"],"dc:title":["The Sublime and the Dutiful: Ethics and Excess From Edwards to Melville"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z"}