{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81483"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81483","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The Familiar Foreigner: English Colonists and American Indians Writing Each Other","abstract":"In captivity narratives and missionary documents of the early colonial period (1608-c. 1750), English colonists portray Native American cultures as completely foreign yet eerily familiar. Captivity narratives play on foreignness while missionary documents play on familiarity; but both fall back on (and, ultimately, feed on) the other in their characterizations of colonial/Indian relations. Early American Indian writers such as Samson Occom and William Apess, meanwhile, try to reinterpret and reverse these tropes of familiarity and alienness: white culture acts as the alien culture which the Indian must adapt to or alter; the Indian acts as captive or missionary to this alien culture. Thus colonial-authored captivity narratives often question whether the (colonial) captive can influence his or her captors, and they speak the fear that the captive may become Indianized; missionary writings and the writings of Apess and Occom question whether Indians can convert to Christianity and colonial (or American) ways of life. By allowing for colonists to Indianize or for Indians to assimilate to colonial life, all these writings express their fears (and, occasionally, hopes) that--as we might phrase it today--culture may ultimately supersede notions of biological race in determining a person's religious convictions, social class, political affiliations, and racial loyalties.","abstract_html":"In captivity narratives and missionary documents of the early colonial period (1608-c. 1750), English colonists portray Native American cultures as completely foreign yet eerily familiar. Captivity narratives play on foreignness while missionary documents play on familiarity; but both fall back on (and, ultimately, feed on) the other in their characterizations of colonial/Indian relations. Early American Indian writers such as Samson Occom and William Apess, meanwhile, try to reinterpret and reverse these tropes of familiarity and alienness: white culture acts as the alien culture which the Indian must adapt to or alter; the Indian acts as captive or missionary to this alien culture. Thus colonial-authored captivity narratives often question whether the (colonial) captive can influence his or her captors, and they speak the fear that the captive may become Indianized; missionary writings and the writings of Apess and Occom question whether Indians can convert to Christianity and colonial (or American) ways of life. By allowing for colonists to Indianize or for Indians to assimilate to colonial life, all these writings express their fears (and, occasionally, hopes) that--as we might phrase it today--culture may ultimately supersede notions of biological race in determining a person's religious convictions, social class, political affiliations, and racial loyalties.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bouwman, Heather M."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"English","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Parker, Robert Dale"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:15:38Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:15:38Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z","subjects":["Anthropology, Cultural"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9904394"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9904394","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81483","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Parker, Robert Dale"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bouwman, Heather M."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:15:38Z","10000-01-01","1998"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Anthropology, Cultural"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81483","(MiAaPQ)AAI9904394"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["In captivity narratives and missionary documents of the early colonial period (1608-c. 1750), English colonists portray Native American cultures as completely foreign yet eerily familiar. Captivity narratives play on foreignness while missionary documents play on familiarity; but both fall back on (and, ultimately, feed on) the other in their characterizations of colonial/Indian relations. Early American Indian writers such as Samson Occom and William Apess, meanwhile, try to reinterpret and reverse these tropes of familiarity and alienness: white culture acts as the alien culture which the Indian must adapt to or alter; the Indian acts as captive or missionary to this alien culture. Thus colonial-authored captivity narratives often question whether the (colonial) captive can influence his or her captors, and they speak the fear that the captive may become Indianized; missionary writings and the writings of Apess and Occom question whether Indians can convert to Christianity and colonial (or American) ways of life. By allowing for colonists to Indianize or for Indians to assimilate to colonial life, all these writings express their fears (and, occasionally, hopes) that--as we might phrase it today--culture may ultimately supersede notions of biological race in determining a person's religious convictions, social class, political affiliations, and racial loyalties.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9904394.pdf: 13937283 bytes, checksum: af2ada5a1ab91319faee1498ca32813c (MD5) Previous issue date: 1998","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82764 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","246 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Familiar Foreigner: English Colonists and American Indians Writing Each Other"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Parker, Robert Dale"],"dc:creator":["Bouwman, Heather M."],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:15:38Z","10000-01-01","1998"],"dc:description":["In captivity narratives and missionary documents of the early colonial period (1608-c. 1750), English colonists portray Native American cultures as completely foreign yet eerily familiar. Captivity narratives play on foreignness while missionary documents play on familiarity; but both fall back on (and, ultimately, feed on) the other in their characterizations of colonial/Indian relations. Early American Indian writers such as Samson Occom and William Apess, meanwhile, try to reinterpret and reverse these tropes of familiarity and alienness: white culture acts as the alien culture which the Indian must adapt to or alter; the Indian acts as captive or missionary to this alien culture. Thus colonial-authored captivity narratives often question whether the (colonial) captive can influence his or her captors, and they speak the fear that the captive may become Indianized; missionary writings and the writings of Apess and Occom question whether Indians can convert to Christianity and colonial (or American) ways of life. By allowing for colonists to Indianize or for Indians to assimilate to colonial life, all these writings express their fears (and, occasionally, hopes) that--as we might phrase it today--culture may ultimately supersede notions of biological race in determining a person's religious convictions, social class, political affiliations, and racial loyalties.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9904394.pdf: 13937283 bytes, checksum: af2ada5a1ab91319faee1498ca32813c (MD5) Previous issue date: 1998","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82764 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","246 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81483","(MiAaPQ)AAI9904394"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Anthropology, Cultural"],"dc:title":["The Familiar Foreigner: English Colonists and American Indians Writing Each Other"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z"}