{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81409"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81409","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Rules of Engagement: Modernism's Impersonal Interior","abstract":"\"This study begins by elaborating what I understand to be the ethical paradox impersonality poses, particularly in the dissolution of individuality it supports. As shown in Wyndham Lewis' command that we impersonally \"\"substitute ourselves everywhere for the animal world,\"\" the potential collectivity established by an impersonal engagement may in fact end up subsuming the object of that connection into the subject who initiates it, thereby reaffirming personality in its most authoritative dimension. Yet variants of modernist impersonality found in work by writers such as H.D., Elizabeth Bowen and Mary Butts discern the ethical dangers of this impersonal collapse of subject and object by engaging the question of how to preserve meaningful aesthetic space. The answers often lie in the realm of affective attachments to aesthetic objects. By examining these variants of impersonality, \"\"Rules of Engagement\"\" identifies the junctures where the politically progressive, empathic logic of impersonality slips into authoritarian fantasies of invasion and control.\"","abstract_html":""This study begins by elaborating what I understand to be the ethical paradox impersonality poses, particularly in the dissolution of individuality it supports. As shown in Wyndham Lewis' command that we impersonally ""substitute ourselves everywhere for the animal world,"" the potential collectivity established by an impersonal engagement may in fact end up subsuming the object of that connection into the subject who initiates it, thereby reaffirming personality in its most authoritative dimension. Yet variants of modernist impersonality found in work by writers such as H.D., Elizabeth Bowen and Mary Butts discern the ethical dangers of this impersonal collapse of subject and object by engaging the question of how to preserve meaningful aesthetic space. The answers often lie in the realm of affective attachments to aesthetic objects. By examining these variants of impersonality, ""Rules of Engagement"" identifies the junctures where the politically progressive, empathic logic of impersonality slips into authoritarian fantasies of invasion and control."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Rives, Rochelle Lea"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"English","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Janet Lyon"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":null,"date_issued":"10000-01-01","date_published":"10000-01-01","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z","subjects":["Women's Studies"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3153414"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3153414","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81409","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Janet Lyon"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Rives, Rochelle Lea"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["10000-01-01","2004","2015-09-25T20:15:11Z"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Women's Studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81409","(MiAaPQ)AAI3153414"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"This study begins by elaborating what I understand to be the ethical paradox impersonality poses, particularly in the dissolution of individuality it supports. As shown in Wyndham Lewis' command that we impersonally \"\"substitute ourselves everywhere for the animal world,\"\" the potential collectivity established by an impersonal engagement may in fact end up subsuming the object of that connection into the subject who initiates it, thereby reaffirming personality in its most authoritative dimension. Yet variants of modernist impersonality found in work by writers such as H.D., Elizabeth Bowen and Mary Butts discern the ethical dangers of this impersonal collapse of subject and object by engaging the question of how to preserve meaningful aesthetic space. The answers often lie in the realm of affective attachments to aesthetic objects. By examining these variants of impersonality, \"\"Rules of Engagement\"\" identifies the junctures where the politically progressive, empathic logic of impersonality slips into authoritarian fantasies of invasion and control.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3153414.pdf: 18902489 bytes, checksum: f8d6d21ab47cf2719ea154b5ae19f093 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82690 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","356 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Rules of Engagement: Modernism's Impersonal Interior"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Janet Lyon"],"dc:creator":["Rives, Rochelle Lea"],"dc:date":["10000-01-01","2004","2015-09-25T20:15:11Z"],"dc:description":["\"This study begins by elaborating what I understand to be the ethical paradox impersonality poses, particularly in the dissolution of individuality it supports. As shown in Wyndham Lewis' command that we impersonally \"\"substitute ourselves everywhere for the animal world,\"\" the potential collectivity established by an impersonal engagement may in fact end up subsuming the object of that connection into the subject who initiates it, thereby reaffirming personality in its most authoritative dimension. Yet variants of modernist impersonality found in work by writers such as H.D., Elizabeth Bowen and Mary Butts discern the ethical dangers of this impersonal collapse of subject and object by engaging the question of how to preserve meaningful aesthetic space. The answers often lie in the realm of affective attachments to aesthetic objects. By examining these variants of impersonality, \"\"Rules of Engagement\"\" identifies the junctures where the politically progressive, empathic logic of impersonality slips into authoritarian fantasies of invasion and control.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3153414.pdf: 18902489 bytes, checksum: f8d6d21ab47cf2719ea154b5ae19f093 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82690 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","356 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81409","(MiAaPQ)AAI3153414"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Women's Studies"],"dc:title":["Rules of Engagement: Modernism's Impersonal Interior"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z"}