{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81394"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81394","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Distributed Argumentative Activity: Redefining Arguments and Their Re -Mediation From a Sociohistoric Perspective","abstract":"In Chapter Five, I apply the findings of these case studies to writing studies pedagogy, claiming that to prepare students to argue in diverse settings and to employ evolving media, writing courses must call attention to tacit and explicit negotiations over expectations, knowledge, tools, and so on. I consider the potential for the collaboratory---a distributed, shared suite of resources---to provide opportunities to engage in complex, reflective rhetorical practices. In sum, I argue that the notion of distributed argumentative activity offers a pedagogically as well as theoretically rich account of how people continually redefine argument/argumentation and alter the conditions under which their arguments may be deemed successful in school, disciplinary, and workplace contexts.","abstract_html":"In Chapter Five, I apply the findings of these case studies to writing studies pedagogy, claiming that to prepare students to argue in diverse settings and to employ evolving media, writing courses must call attention to tacit and explicit negotiations over expectations, knowledge, tools, and so on. I consider the potential for the collaboratory---a distributed, shared suite of resources---to provide opportunities to engage in complex, reflective rhetorical practices. In sum, I argue that the notion of distributed argumentative activity offers a pedagogically as well as theoretically rich account of how people continually redefine argument/argumentation and alter the conditions under which their arguments may be deemed successful in school, disciplinary, and workplace contexts.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lunsford, Karen J."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"English","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Prior, Paul"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:15:04Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:15:04Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z","subjects":["Library Science"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3101912"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3101912","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81394","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Prior, Paul"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lunsford, Karen J."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:15:04Z","10000-01-01","2003"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Library Science"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81394","(MiAaPQ)AAI3101912"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["In Chapter Five, I apply the findings of these case studies to writing studies pedagogy, claiming that to prepare students to argue in diverse settings and to employ evolving media, writing courses must call attention to tacit and explicit negotiations over expectations, knowledge, tools, and so on. I consider the potential for the collaboratory---a distributed, shared suite of resources---to provide opportunities to engage in complex, reflective rhetorical practices. In sum, I argue that the notion of distributed argumentative activity offers a pedagogically as well as theoretically rich account of how people continually redefine argument/argumentation and alter the conditions under which their arguments may be deemed successful in school, disciplinary, and workplace contexts.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3101912.pdf: 14169822 bytes, checksum: 11977a3d4afa722d9a5f265d2dff86f8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82675 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","294 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Distributed Argumentative Activity: Redefining Arguments and Their Re -Mediation From a Sociohistoric Perspective"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Prior, Paul"],"dc:creator":["Lunsford, Karen J."],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:15:04Z","10000-01-01","2003"],"dc:description":["In Chapter Five, I apply the findings of these case studies to writing studies pedagogy, claiming that to prepare students to argue in diverse settings and to employ evolving media, writing courses must call attention to tacit and explicit negotiations over expectations, knowledge, tools, and so on. I consider the potential for the collaboratory---a distributed, shared suite of resources---to provide opportunities to engage in complex, reflective rhetorical practices. In sum, I argue that the notion of distributed argumentative activity offers a pedagogically as well as theoretically rich account of how people continually redefine argument/argumentation and alter the conditions under which their arguments may be deemed successful in school, disciplinary, and workplace contexts.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3101912.pdf: 14169822 bytes, checksum: 11977a3d4afa722d9a5f265d2dff86f8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82675 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","294 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81394","(MiAaPQ)AAI3101912"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Library Science"],"dc:title":["Distributed Argumentative Activity: Redefining Arguments and Their Re -Mediation From a Sociohistoric Perspective"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z"}