{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81390"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/81390","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Working-Class Black Male First -Year Writers and Their Composition Teaching Assistants: Negotiating Power and Authority in the Basic Writing Classroom","abstract":"\"This interpretive ethnography focuses on a basic writing course for one spring semester, examining the interpersonal dynamics between a young, white upper-middle-class teaching assistant, who favors certain aspects of decentered classroom pedagogy, and three African-American males, two of whom hail from single-mother working-class homes. In particular, this study explores how effective certain decentered classroom heuristics are in relation to the three men and their twelve women classmates, all of whom are second-semester freshmen in phase two of this sequential Rhetoric 102 course. In examining group collaborations, class discussions (frequently influenced significantly by four women), oral presentations, and the instructor's periodically \"\"lowered classroom profile,\"\" I analyze why the men chose not to invest themselves in this non-hierarchical process nor engage their classmates and T.A. As the men's silence grows throughout the semester, I problematize how the teaching assistant attempts to negotiate his power and authority vis-a-vis the men in terms of assignment choices and deadlines, missed quizzes, persistent tardiness to class, and extra-credit assignments to atone for poor weekly-journal grades. As a result of the student-empowering goals of decentered classroom pedagogy (under which several women flourished) and some black male students' preference for a \"\"familiar\"\" authoritative teacher, this study weighs the instructional effectiveness of this popular pedagogy in these first-year writers' development, particularly when their instructor is not fully aware of the cultural and intra-racial influences on his students.\"","abstract_html":""This interpretive ethnography focuses on a basic writing course for one spring semester, examining the interpersonal dynamics between a young, white upper-middle-class teaching assistant, who favors certain aspects of decentered classroom pedagogy, and three African-American males, two of whom hail from single-mother working-class homes. In particular, this study explores how effective certain decentered classroom heuristics are in relation to the three men and their twelve women classmates, all of whom are second-semester freshmen in phase two of this sequential Rhetoric 102 course. In examining group collaborations, class discussions (frequently influenced significantly by four women), oral presentations, and the instructor's periodically ""lowered classroom profile,"" I analyze why the men chose not to invest themselves in this non-hierarchical process nor engage their classmates and T.A. As the men's silence grows throughout the semester, I problematize how the teaching assistant attempts to negotiate his power and authority vis-a-vis the men in terms of assignment choices and deadlines, missed quizzes, persistent tardiness to class, and extra-credit assignments to atone for poor weekly-journal grades. As a result of the student-empowering goals of decentered classroom pedagogy (under which several women flourished) and some black male students' preference for a ""familiar"" authoritative teacher, this study weighs the instructional effectiveness of this popular pedagogy in these first-year writers' development, particularly when their instructor is not fully aware of the cultural and intra-racial influences on his students."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lugo, Thomas Anthony"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"English","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Gail Hawisher"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T20:15:01Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T20:15:01Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z","subjects":["Education, Language and Literature"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3086127"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3086127","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81390","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Gail Hawisher"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lugo, Thomas Anthony"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T20:15:01Z","10000-01-01","2003"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Education, Language and Literature"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81390","(MiAaPQ)AAI3086127"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"This interpretive ethnography focuses on a basic writing course for one spring semester, examining the interpersonal dynamics between a young, white upper-middle-class teaching assistant, who favors certain aspects of decentered classroom pedagogy, and three African-American males, two of whom hail from single-mother working-class homes. In particular, this study explores how effective certain decentered classroom heuristics are in relation to the three men and their twelve women classmates, all of whom are second-semester freshmen in phase two of this sequential Rhetoric 102 course. In examining group collaborations, class discussions (frequently influenced significantly by four women), oral presentations, and the instructor's periodically \"\"lowered classroom profile,\"\" I analyze why the men chose not to invest themselves in this non-hierarchical process nor engage their classmates and T.A. As the men's silence grows throughout the semester, I problematize how the teaching assistant attempts to negotiate his power and authority vis-a-vis the men in terms of assignment choices and deadlines, missed quizzes, persistent tardiness to class, and extra-credit assignments to atone for poor weekly-journal grades. As a result of the student-empowering goals of decentered classroom pedagogy (under which several women flourished) and some black male students' preference for a \"\"familiar\"\" authoritative teacher, this study weighs the instructional effectiveness of this popular pedagogy in these first-year writers' development, particularly when their instructor is not fully aware of the cultural and intra-racial influences on his students.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3086127.pdf: 16649713 bytes, checksum: 64960e2fb1e38c84ec5c4b479d47983a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82671 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","316 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Working-Class Black Male First -Year Writers and Their Composition Teaching Assistants: Negotiating Power and Authority in the Basic Writing Classroom"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Gail Hawisher"],"dc:creator":["Lugo, Thomas Anthony"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T20:15:01Z","10000-01-01","2003"],"dc:description":["\"This interpretive ethnography focuses on a basic writing course for one spring semester, examining the interpersonal dynamics between a young, white upper-middle-class teaching assistant, who favors certain aspects of decentered classroom pedagogy, and three African-American males, two of whom hail from single-mother working-class homes. In particular, this study explores how effective certain decentered classroom heuristics are in relation to the three men and their twelve women classmates, all of whom are second-semester freshmen in phase two of this sequential Rhetoric 102 course. In examining group collaborations, class discussions (frequently influenced significantly by four women), oral presentations, and the instructor's periodically \"\"lowered classroom profile,\"\" I analyze why the men chose not to invest themselves in this non-hierarchical process nor engage their classmates and T.A. As the men's silence grows throughout the semester, I problematize how the teaching assistant attempts to negotiate his power and authority vis-a-vis the men in terms of assignment choices and deadlines, missed quizzes, persistent tardiness to class, and extra-credit assignments to atone for poor weekly-journal grades. As a result of the student-empowering goals of decentered classroom pedagogy (under which several women flourished) and some black male students' preference for a \"\"familiar\"\" authoritative teacher, this study weighs the instructional effectiveness of this popular pedagogy in these first-year writers' development, particularly when their instructor is not fully aware of the cultural and intra-racial influences on his students.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T20:15:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3086127.pdf: 16649713 bytes, checksum: 64960e2fb1e38c84ec5c4b479d47983a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 82671 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","316 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/81390","(MiAaPQ)AAI3086127"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Education, Language and Literature"],"dc:title":["Working-Class Black Male First -Year Writers and Their Composition Teaching Assistants: Negotiating Power and Authority in the Basic Writing Classroom"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:16Z"}