{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80315"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80315","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Questioning the Information Subtest of the Wais-R: Dimensionality, DIF and DBF Analysis, and the Assessment of Category-Specific Semantic Memory Disturbances in Unilaterally Brain -Lesioned Patients","abstract":"\"In this investigation the WAIS-R Information subtest was conceptualized as a measure of auditory-verbal semantic memory. The study's major purposes were to: (1) test the prediction that a Left Hemisphere Lesion group (LHL; n = 207) would perform significantly more poorly on the Information subtest than would a Right Hemisphere Lesion group (RHL; n = 203) and a Normal Control group (NC; n = 409), (2) test the prediction that the subtest's underlying dimensional structure would be multidimensional for all three examinee groups, and (3) investigate the predictions that either items or item clusters would manifest either differential item functioning (DIF) and/or differential bundle functioning (DBF) in interaction with the LHL group. With respect to this latter hypothesis, it was predicted that single items representing content known to be sensitive to left hemisphere lesion would exhibit DIF, and that DBF would emerge to demonstrate the LHL group would experience differential difficulty with item clusters reflecting the category-specific semantic domain of \"\"non-living/inanimate\"\" things and knowledge categories suggested by Kaplan and her colleagues (1991). Results showed the LHL group performed more poorly overall than the RHL and NC groups. In addition, the RHL group performed more poorly on this subtest than did the NC group, although the difference was small. Using as a theoretical basis the multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model of Stout (1987, 1990) and its associated statistic, DIMTEST, the subtest was found to be multidimensional for all three examinee groups. In contrast, a factor analytic investigation of the subtest revealed a unidimensional underlying structure for all three groups. DIF and DBF were conceptualized using Shealy and Stout's (1993a, 1993b) MIRT model and analyses were convened using an associated statistic, SIBTEST. Various items and item clusters exhibited DIF/DBF in interaction with the LHL group. However, the \"\"non-living/inanimate\"\" things item subset did not exhibit DIF/DBF in interaction with this group, but instead exhibited DIF/DBF in interaction with the RHL group. Finally, various items and item clusters representing the semantic categories inspired by the proposals of Kaplan, et al. (1991) exhibited DIF and/or DBF. Results are discussed and the implications for practice and future research are offered.\"","abstract_html":""In this investigation the WAIS-R Information subtest was conceptualized as a measure of auditory-verbal semantic memory. The study's major purposes were to: (1) test the prediction that a Left Hemisphere Lesion group (LHL; n = 207) would perform significantly more poorly on the Information subtest than would a Right Hemisphere Lesion group (RHL; n = 203) and a Normal Control group (NC; n = 409), (2) test the prediction that the subtest's underlying dimensional structure would be multidimensional for all three examinee groups, and (3) investigate the predictions that either items or item clusters would manifest either differential item functioning (DIF) and/or differential bundle functioning (DBF) in interaction with the LHL group. With respect to this latter hypothesis, it was predicted that single items representing content known to be sensitive to left hemisphere lesion would exhibit DIF, and that DBF would emerge to demonstrate the LHL group would experience differential difficulty with item clusters reflecting the category-specific semantic domain of ""non-living/inanimate"" things and knowledge categories suggested by Kaplan and her colleagues (1991). Results showed the LHL group performed more poorly overall than the RHL and NC groups. In addition, the RHL group performed more poorly on this subtest than did the NC group, although the difference was small. Using as a theoretical basis the multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model of Stout (1987, 1990) and its associated statistic, DIMTEST, the subtest was found to be multidimensional for all three examinee groups. In contrast, a factor analytic investigation of the subtest revealed a unidimensional underlying structure for all three groups. DIF and DBF were conceptualized using Shealy and Stout's (1993a, 1993b) MIRT model and analyses were convened using an associated statistic, SIBTEST. Various items and item clusters exhibited DIF/DBF in interaction with the LHL group. However, the ""non-living/inanimate"" things item subset did not exhibit DIF/DBF in interaction with this group, but instead exhibited DIF/DBF in interaction with the RHL group. Finally, various items and item clusters representing the semantic categories inspired by the proposals of Kaplan, et al. (1991) exhibited DIF and/or DBF. Results are discussed and the implications for practice and future research are offered."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Chapman, Saul Howard"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Farmer, Helen S."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T19:56:30Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T19:56:30Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:14Z","subjects":["Psychology, Cognitive"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI9944815"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI9944815","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80315","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Farmer, Helen S."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Chapman, Saul Howard"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T19:56:30Z","10000-01-01","1999"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Cognitive"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80315","(MiAaPQ)AAI9944815"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"In this investigation the WAIS-R Information subtest was conceptualized as a measure of auditory-verbal semantic memory. The study's major purposes were to: (1) test the prediction that a Left Hemisphere Lesion group (LHL; n = 207) would perform significantly more poorly on the Information subtest than would a Right Hemisphere Lesion group (RHL; n = 203) and a Normal Control group (NC; n = 409), (2) test the prediction that the subtest's underlying dimensional structure would be multidimensional for all three examinee groups, and (3) investigate the predictions that either items or item clusters would manifest either differential item functioning (DIF) and/or differential bundle functioning (DBF) in interaction with the LHL group. With respect to this latter hypothesis, it was predicted that single items representing content known to be sensitive to left hemisphere lesion would exhibit DIF, and that DBF would emerge to demonstrate the LHL group would experience differential difficulty with item clusters reflecting the category-specific semantic domain of \"\"non-living/inanimate\"\" things and knowledge categories suggested by Kaplan and her colleagues (1991). Results showed the LHL group performed more poorly overall than the RHL and NC groups. In addition, the RHL group performed more poorly on this subtest than did the NC group, although the difference was small. Using as a theoretical basis the multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model of Stout (1987, 1990) and its associated statistic, DIMTEST, the subtest was found to be multidimensional for all three examinee groups. In contrast, a factor analytic investigation of the subtest revealed a unidimensional underlying structure for all three groups. DIF and DBF were conceptualized using Shealy and Stout's (1993a, 1993b) MIRT model and analyses were convened using an associated statistic, SIBTEST. Various items and item clusters exhibited DIF/DBF in interaction with the LHL group. However, the \"\"non-living/inanimate\"\" things item subset did not exhibit DIF/DBF in interaction with this group, but instead exhibited DIF/DBF in interaction with the RHL group. Finally, various items and item clusters representing the semantic categories inspired by the proposals of Kaplan, et al. (1991) exhibited DIF and/or DBF. Results are discussed and the implications for practice and future research are offered.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:56:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9944815.pdf: 4647163 bytes, checksum: 58727b9444ca2e4578df8c55612f43f0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1999","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 81597 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","134 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Questioning the Information Subtest of the Wais-R: Dimensionality, DIF and DBF Analysis, and the Assessment of Category-Specific Semantic Memory Disturbances in Unilaterally Brain -Lesioned Patients"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Farmer, Helen S."],"dc:creator":["Chapman, Saul Howard"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T19:56:30Z","10000-01-01","1999"],"dc:description":["\"In this investigation the WAIS-R Information subtest was conceptualized as a measure of auditory-verbal semantic memory. The study's major purposes were to: (1) test the prediction that a Left Hemisphere Lesion group (LHL; n = 207) would perform significantly more poorly on the Information subtest than would a Right Hemisphere Lesion group (RHL; n = 203) and a Normal Control group (NC; n = 409), (2) test the prediction that the subtest's underlying dimensional structure would be multidimensional for all three examinee groups, and (3) investigate the predictions that either items or item clusters would manifest either differential item functioning (DIF) and/or differential bundle functioning (DBF) in interaction with the LHL group. With respect to this latter hypothesis, it was predicted that single items representing content known to be sensitive to left hemisphere lesion would exhibit DIF, and that DBF would emerge to demonstrate the LHL group would experience differential difficulty with item clusters reflecting the category-specific semantic domain of \"\"non-living/inanimate\"\" things and knowledge categories suggested by Kaplan and her colleagues (1991). Results showed the LHL group performed more poorly overall than the RHL and NC groups. In addition, the RHL group performed more poorly on this subtest than did the NC group, although the difference was small. Using as a theoretical basis the multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model of Stout (1987, 1990) and its associated statistic, DIMTEST, the subtest was found to be multidimensional for all three examinee groups. In contrast, a factor analytic investigation of the subtest revealed a unidimensional underlying structure for all three groups. DIF and DBF were conceptualized using Shealy and Stout's (1993a, 1993b) MIRT model and analyses were convened using an associated statistic, SIBTEST. Various items and item clusters exhibited DIF/DBF in interaction with the LHL group. However, the \"\"non-living/inanimate\"\" things item subset did not exhibit DIF/DBF in interaction with this group, but instead exhibited DIF/DBF in interaction with the RHL group. Finally, various items and item clusters representing the semantic categories inspired by the proposals of Kaplan, et al. (1991) exhibited DIF and/or DBF. Results are discussed and the implications for practice and future research are offered.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:56:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 9944815.pdf: 4647163 bytes, checksum: 58727b9444ca2e4578df8c55612f43f0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1999","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 81597 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","134 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80315","(MiAaPQ)AAI9944815"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Cognitive"],"dc:title":["Questioning the Information Subtest of the Wais-R: Dimensionality, DIF and DBF Analysis, and the Assessment of Category-Specific Semantic Memory Disturbances in Unilaterally Brain -Lesioned Patients"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:14Z"}