{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80065"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/80065","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The Social Context of Prejudice: Peer Group Effects on Individuals' Homophobic and Racist Attitudes","abstract":"Across two studies, the contextual and socialization effects of peer groups on group members' own homophobic and racist attitudes were examined using multilevel modeling. In Study One, group-level compositional characteristics and social climates characterized as open to diversity, hierarchy-enhancing, and authoritarian were tested as contextual and cross-level moderating effects accounting for individuals' own prejudiced attitudes. Results indicated significant within-group similarity on prejudiced attitudes, as well as distinct differences in attitudes across various peer groups. Significant contextual effects of the peer group contributed to more accurate predictions of individuals' prejudiced attitudes over and above their own attitudes on related factors. Furthermore, several cross-level moderating effects of the group climate either strengthened or weakened the extent to which individuals' own attitudes on certain factors accounted for their prejudiced attitudes. In Study Two, socializing contextual effects of the peer group were tested in predicting participants' prejudiced attitudes three months later. Results indicated that even after controlling for individuals' own previously reported prejudiced attitudes, significant socializing contextual effects were documented. This suggested that individuals do not form or maintain their prejudiced attitudes independently, and that differences in prejudiced attitudes cannot be sufficiently explained based only on personality or attitudinal individual differences, or even on individuals' own previously reported prejudiced attitudes. Rather, the ongoing effects of socialization processes within friendship groups necessitate a broader examination of the way in which individuals and groups form, maintain, or change their prejudiced attitudes over time. Combined, these findings support the argument to directly incorporate the study of young adult friendship groups into the empirical research examining the development and perpetuation of prejudiced attitudes. Overall, the continued study of friendship groups is necessary in effort to contribute to a more critical understanding of the dynamic nature of prejudice.","abstract_html":"Across two studies, the contextual and socialization effects of peer groups on group members' own homophobic and racist attitudes were examined using multilevel modeling. In Study One, group-level compositional characteristics and social climates characterized as open to diversity, hierarchy-enhancing, and authoritarian were tested as contextual and cross-level moderating effects accounting for individuals' own prejudiced attitudes. Results indicated significant within-group similarity on prejudiced attitudes, as well as distinct differences in attitudes across various peer groups. Significant contextual effects of the peer group contributed to more accurate predictions of individuals' prejudiced attitudes over and above their own attitudes on related factors. Furthermore, several cross-level moderating effects of the group climate either strengthened or weakened the extent to which individuals' own attitudes on certain factors accounted for their prejudiced attitudes. In Study Two, socializing contextual effects of the peer group were tested in predicting participants' prejudiced attitudes three months later. Results indicated that even after controlling for individuals' own previously reported prejudiced attitudes, significant socializing contextual effects were documented. This suggested that individuals do not form or maintain their prejudiced attitudes independently, and that differences in prejudiced attitudes cannot be sufficiently explained based only on personality or attitudinal individual differences, or even on individuals' own previously reported prejudiced attitudes. Rather, the ongoing effects of socialization processes within friendship groups necessitate a broader examination of the way in which individuals and groups form, maintain, or change their prejudiced attitudes over time. Combined, these findings support the argument to directly incorporate the study of young adult friendship groups into the empirical research examining the development and perpetuation of prejudiced attitudes. Overall, the continued study of friendship groups is necessary in effort to contribute to a more critical understanding of the dynamic nature of prejudice.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Poteat, Paul"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Educational Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Spanierman, Lisa B."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2008,"date_issued":"2008","date_published":"2008","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:13Z","subjects":["Psychology, Social"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3337889"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3337889","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80065","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Spanierman, Lisa B."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Poteat, Paul"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2008","2015-09-25T19:55:09Z","10000-01-01"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psychology, Social"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80065","(MiAaPQ)AAI3337889"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Across two studies, the contextual and socialization effects of peer groups on group members' own homophobic and racist attitudes were examined using multilevel modeling. In Study One, group-level compositional characteristics and social climates characterized as open to diversity, hierarchy-enhancing, and authoritarian were tested as contextual and cross-level moderating effects accounting for individuals' own prejudiced attitudes. Results indicated significant within-group similarity on prejudiced attitudes, as well as distinct differences in attitudes across various peer groups. Significant contextual effects of the peer group contributed to more accurate predictions of individuals' prejudiced attitudes over and above their own attitudes on related factors. Furthermore, several cross-level moderating effects of the group climate either strengthened or weakened the extent to which individuals' own attitudes on certain factors accounted for their prejudiced attitudes. In Study Two, socializing contextual effects of the peer group were tested in predicting participants' prejudiced attitudes three months later. Results indicated that even after controlling for individuals' own previously reported prejudiced attitudes, significant socializing contextual effects were documented. This suggested that individuals do not form or maintain their prejudiced attitudes independently, and that differences in prejudiced attitudes cannot be sufficiently explained based only on personality or attitudinal individual differences, or even on individuals' own previously reported prejudiced attitudes. Rather, the ongoing effects of socialization processes within friendship groups necessitate a broader examination of the way in which individuals and groups form, maintain, or change their prejudiced attitudes over time. Combined, these findings support the argument to directly incorporate the study of young adult friendship groups into the empirical research examining the development and perpetuation of prejudiced attitudes. Overall, the continued study of friendship groups is necessary in effort to contribute to a more critical understanding of the dynamic nature of prejudice.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:55:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3337889.pdf: 4656336 bytes, checksum: 94eb190f39e39cbbc0406aba909c614c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 81347 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","106 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Social Context of Prejudice: Peer Group Effects on Individuals' Homophobic and Racist Attitudes"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Spanierman, Lisa B."],"dc:creator":["Poteat, Paul"],"dc:date":["2008","2015-09-25T19:55:09Z","10000-01-01"],"dc:description":["Across two studies, the contextual and socialization effects of peer groups on group members' own homophobic and racist attitudes were examined using multilevel modeling. In Study One, group-level compositional characteristics and social climates characterized as open to diversity, hierarchy-enhancing, and authoritarian were tested as contextual and cross-level moderating effects accounting for individuals' own prejudiced attitudes. Results indicated significant within-group similarity on prejudiced attitudes, as well as distinct differences in attitudes across various peer groups. Significant contextual effects of the peer group contributed to more accurate predictions of individuals' prejudiced attitudes over and above their own attitudes on related factors. Furthermore, several cross-level moderating effects of the group climate either strengthened or weakened the extent to which individuals' own attitudes on certain factors accounted for their prejudiced attitudes. In Study Two, socializing contextual effects of the peer group were tested in predicting participants' prejudiced attitudes three months later. Results indicated that even after controlling for individuals' own previously reported prejudiced attitudes, significant socializing contextual effects were documented. This suggested that individuals do not form or maintain their prejudiced attitudes independently, and that differences in prejudiced attitudes cannot be sufficiently explained based only on personality or attitudinal individual differences, or even on individuals' own previously reported prejudiced attitudes. Rather, the ongoing effects of socialization processes within friendship groups necessitate a broader examination of the way in which individuals and groups form, maintain, or change their prejudiced attitudes over time. Combined, these findings support the argument to directly incorporate the study of young adult friendship groups into the empirical research examining the development and perpetuation of prejudiced attitudes. Overall, the continued study of friendship groups is necessary in effort to contribute to a more critical understanding of the dynamic nature of prejudice.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:55:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3337889.pdf: 4656336 bytes, checksum: 94eb190f39e39cbbc0406aba909c614c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 81347 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","106 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/80065","(MiAaPQ)AAI3337889"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Psychology, Social"],"dc:title":["The Social Context of Prejudice: Peer Group Effects on Individuals' Homophobic and Racist Attitudes"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:13Z"}