{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/79630"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/79630","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Using Differential Item Functioning (Dif) Procedures for Investigating the Cross -Cultural Equivalence of Personality Tests","abstract":"The results showed that the extraversion scale of the 16PF had the same factor structure across the two groups only in that it had the same number of factors and the same items on each factor. According to the DIF results, the choice of matching variables based on a combination of internal and external measures appeared to have little effect and the iterative purification method was unsuccessful. The DIF results were relatively consistent across two DIF methods and item types. However, there was found the possibility of incorrectly classifying items as DIF or non-DIF when dichotomizing polytomous items. In addition, LDFA seemed to perform more consistently across item types than SIBTEST. In summary, the results generally showed a small number of DIF items on each scale, except for scales A and N where about half of the items showed DIF. From the qualitative review of items, the main reasons for DIF were found to be translation difficulty and differences in cultural relevance.","abstract_html":"The results showed that the extraversion scale of the 16PF had the same factor structure across the two groups only in that it had the same number of factors and the same items on each factor. According to the DIF results, the choice of matching variables based on a combination of internal and external measures appeared to have little effect and the iterative purification method was unsuccessful. The DIF results were relatively consistent across two DIF methods and item types. However, there was found the possibility of incorrectly classifying items as DIF or non-DIF when dichotomizing polytomous items. In addition, LDFA seemed to perform more consistently across item types than SIBTEST. In summary, the results generally showed a small number of DIF items on each scale, except for scales A and N where about half of the items showed DIF. From the qualitative review of items, the main reasons for DIF were found to be translation difficulty and differences in cultural relevance.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sohn, Wonsook Julie"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Wardrop, James L."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T19:52:36Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T19:52:36Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:12Z","subjects":["Education, Educational Psychology"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3023202"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3023202","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/79630","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Wardrop, James L."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sohn, Wonsook Julie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T19:52:36Z","10000-01-01","2001"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Education, Educational Psychology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/79630","(MiAaPQ)AAI3023202"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The results showed that the extraversion scale of the 16PF had the same factor structure across the two groups only in that it had the same number of factors and the same items on each factor. According to the DIF results, the choice of matching variables based on a combination of internal and external measures appeared to have little effect and the iterative purification method was unsuccessful. The DIF results were relatively consistent across two DIF methods and item types. However, there was found the possibility of incorrectly classifying items as DIF or non-DIF when dichotomizing polytomous items. In addition, LDFA seemed to perform more consistently across item types than SIBTEST. In summary, the results generally showed a small number of DIF items on each scale, except for scales A and N where about half of the items showed DIF. From the qualitative review of items, the main reasons for DIF were found to be translation difficulty and differences in cultural relevance.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:52:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3023202.pdf: 6299726 bytes, checksum: 076ab153f03e7e47f8ba960a4cec6de6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 80912 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","167 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Using Differential Item Functioning (Dif) Procedures for Investigating the Cross -Cultural Equivalence of Personality Tests"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Wardrop, James L."],"dc:creator":["Sohn, Wonsook Julie"],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T19:52:36Z","10000-01-01","2001"],"dc:description":["The results showed that the extraversion scale of the 16PF had the same factor structure across the two groups only in that it had the same number of factors and the same items on each factor. According to the DIF results, the choice of matching variables based on a combination of internal and external measures appeared to have little effect and the iterative purification method was unsuccessful. The DIF results were relatively consistent across two DIF methods and item types. However, there was found the possibility of incorrectly classifying items as DIF or non-DIF when dichotomizing polytomous items. In addition, LDFA seemed to perform more consistently across item types than SIBTEST. In summary, the results generally showed a small number of DIF items on each scale, except for scales A and N where about half of the items showed DIF. From the qualitative review of items, the main reasons for DIF were found to be translation difficulty and differences in cultural relevance.","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:52:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3023202.pdf: 6299726 bytes, checksum: 076ab153f03e7e47f8ba960a4cec6de6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 80912 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","167 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/79630","(MiAaPQ)AAI3023202"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Education, Educational Psychology"],"dc:title":["Using Differential Item Functioning (Dif) Procedures for Investigating the Cross -Cultural Equivalence of Personality Tests"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:12Z"}