{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/79587"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/79587","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"University Students' Perceptions, Interpretations, and Preferences Regarding Two -Dimensional and Three -Dimensional Concept Mapping","abstract":"\"The results showed strong support and preference for the three-dimensional concept mapping environment for viewing and comprehending complex, multiple-perspective information and resulted in five prominent conclusions emerging from this study. First, information interpretation is similar for both environments. Second, visualizing content from multiple perspectives is useful to learners. Third, appropriateness of map environment usage varies. Overly simple or overly complex conceptual structures/domains are not appropriate for illustration as conceptual maps. Fourth, the two mapping environments focus attention on different levels. Three-dimensional maps promote understanding of the \"\"big picture\"\" while two-dimensional maps are best suited for analyzing smaller subsets of concepts. Fifth, there were no meaningful interactions between learning styles and treatment environments.\"","abstract_html":""The results showed strong support and preference for the three-dimensional concept mapping environment for viewing and comprehending complex, multiple-perspective information and resulted in five prominent conclusions emerging from this study. First, information interpretation is similar for both environments. Second, visualizing content from multiple perspectives is useful to learners. Third, appropriateness of map environment usage varies. Overly simple or overly complex conceptual structures/domains are not appropriate for illustration as conceptual maps. Fourth, the two mapping environments focus attention on different levels. Three-dimensional maps promote understanding of the ""big picture"" while two-dimensional maps are best suited for analyzing smaller subsets of concepts. Fifth, there were no meaningful interactions between learning styles and treatment environments."","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Downey, Steven E."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Scott Johnson"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-09-25T19:52:20Z","date_published":"2015-09-25T19:52:20Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:12Z","subjects":["Education, Higher"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(MiAaPQ)AAI3017069"],"render_values":[{"text":"(MiAaPQ)AAI3017069","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/79587","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Scott Johnson"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Downey, Steven E."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-09-25T19:52:20Z","10000-01-01","2001"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Education, Higher"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/79587","(MiAaPQ)AAI3017069"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["\"The results showed strong support and preference for the three-dimensional concept mapping environment for viewing and comprehending complex, multiple-perspective information and resulted in five prominent conclusions emerging from this study. First, information interpretation is similar for both environments. Second, visualizing content from multiple perspectives is useful to learners. Third, appropriateness of map environment usage varies. Overly simple or overly complex conceptual structures/domains are not appropriate for illustration as conceptual maps. Fourth, the two mapping environments focus attention on different levels. Three-dimensional maps promote understanding of the \"\"big picture\"\" while two-dimensional maps are best suited for analyzing smaller subsets of concepts. Fifth, there were no meaningful interactions between learning styles and treatment environments.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:52:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3017069.pdf: 7648688 bytes, checksum: 667020ec2a2a737ecf50c1ea4acf14f3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 80869 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","170 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["University Students' Perceptions, Interpretations, and Preferences Regarding Two -Dimensional and Three -Dimensional Concept Mapping"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Scott Johnson"],"dc:creator":["Downey, Steven E."],"dc:date":["2015-09-25T19:52:20Z","10000-01-01","2001"],"dc:description":["\"The results showed strong support and preference for the three-dimensional concept mapping environment for viewing and comprehending complex, multiple-perspective information and resulted in five prominent conclusions emerging from this study. First, information interpretation is similar for both environments. Second, visualizing content from multiple perspectives is useful to learners. Third, appropriateness of map environment usage varies. Overly simple or overly complex conceptual structures/domains are not appropriate for illustration as conceptual maps. Fourth, the two mapping environments focus attention on different levels. Three-dimensional maps promote understanding of the \"\"big picture\"\" while two-dimensional maps are best suited for analyzing smaller subsets of concepts. Fifth, there were no meaningful interactions between learning styles and treatment environments.\"","Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-25T19:52:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license.txt: 4848 bytes, checksum: 96035ab3f5e1c23cc7138a224ce498bd (MD5) 3017069.pdf: 7648688 bytes, checksum: 667020ec2a2a737ecf50c1ea4acf14f3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2001","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 80869 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","170 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/79587","(MiAaPQ)AAI3017069"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Education, Higher"],"dc:title":["University Students' Perceptions, Interpretations, and Preferences Regarding Two -Dimensional and Three -Dimensional Concept Mapping"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:12Z"}