{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/78548"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/78548","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Greenwashing? The global rise of sustainability and forced housing displacement in Fortaleza, Brazil","abstract":"Fortaleza is a lesser-known city of Latin America with over 3.5 million inhabitants, over one-third of whom reside in substandard housing. The city is currently undertaking transportation development projects that are driven by a broader discourse of sustainability, however the outcomes from these projects resemble those associated with urban renewal including slum clearance and public investment for private gain. This study analyzes whether transit projects rooted in sustainability are meeting the triple bottom line of social, economic, and environmental sustainability, with a focus on equitable impacts to both formal and informal settlements. Specifically, this thesis seeks to uncover why infrastructure investments justified as increasing the capacity for sustainability continue to result in the systematic displacement of low-income informal households. To examine the relationships between sustainable infrastructure investments and outcomes including forced displacement, a mixed-methods approach combining a spatial analysis to verify disproportionate impact and interview and document analyses are employed to reveal unique displacement threats. Findings suggest that these projects are causing disproportionate, negative impact on the urban poor of Fortaleza, and that the experiences of individuals who face that negative impact via threats of displacement manifest in patterns which can be corroborated by documentation. Further, findings suggest that these projects are justified and continued under the justification of sustainability, but social sustainability bias, a crucial pillar to broader sustainability, is missing from the picture. This is important for urban planners and policy makers, more generally, as the systemic biases against the urban poor and marginalized groups within the urban poor are not only being perpetuated, but are being further rationalized by a cooptation of an otherwise promising concept: sustainability.","abstract_html":"Fortaleza is a lesser-known city of Latin America with over 3.5 million inhabitants, over one-third of whom reside in substandard housing. The city is currently undertaking transportation development projects that are driven by a broader discourse of sustainability, however the outcomes from these projects resemble those associated with urban renewal including slum clearance and public investment for private gain. This study analyzes whether transit projects rooted in sustainability are meeting the triple bottom line of social, economic, and environmental sustainability, with a focus on equitable impacts to both formal and informal settlements. Specifically, this thesis seeks to uncover why infrastructure investments justified as increasing the capacity for sustainability continue to result in the systematic displacement of low-income informal households. To examine the relationships between sustainable infrastructure investments and outcomes including forced displacement, a mixed-methods approach combining a spatial analysis to verify disproportionate impact and interview and document analyses are employed to reveal unique displacement threats. Findings suggest that these projects are causing disproportionate, negative impact on the urban poor of Fortaleza, and that the experiences of individuals who face that negative impact via threats of displacement manifest in patterns which can be corroborated by documentation. Further, findings suggest that these projects are justified and continued under the justification of sustainability, but social sustainability bias, a crucial pillar to broader sustainability, is missing from the picture. This is important for urban planners and policy makers, more generally, as the systemic biases against the urban poor and marginalized groups within the urban poor are not only being perpetuated, but are being further rationalized by a cooptation of an otherwise promising concept: sustainability.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Contractor, Annie B"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.U.P.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Urban Planning","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-07-22T22:18:09Z","date_published":"2015-07-22T22:18:09Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:11Z","subjects":["forceful housing displacement","informal housing","urban renewal","gentrification","sustainability","globalization","favela","Fortaleza","Brazil"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2015 Annie Contractor"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/78548","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Contractor, Annie B"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-07-22T22:18:09Z","2015-05","2015-04-30","2015-5"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Urban Planning"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.U.P."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["forceful housing displacement","informal housing","urban renewal","gentrification","sustainability","globalization","favela","Fortaleza","Brazil"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2015 Annie Contractor"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/78548"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Fortaleza is a lesser-known city of Latin America with over 3.5 million inhabitants, over one-third of whom reside in substandard housing. The city is currently undertaking transportation development projects that are driven by a broader discourse of sustainability, however the outcomes from these projects resemble those associated with urban renewal including slum clearance and public investment for private gain. This study analyzes whether transit projects rooted in sustainability are meeting the triple bottom line of social, economic, and environmental sustainability, with a focus on equitable impacts to both formal and informal settlements. Specifically, this thesis seeks to uncover why infrastructure investments justified as increasing the capacity for sustainability continue to result in the systematic displacement of low-income informal households. To examine the relationships between sustainable infrastructure investments and outcomes including forced displacement, a mixed-methods approach combining a spatial analysis to verify disproportionate impact and interview and document analyses are employed to reveal unique displacement threats. Findings suggest that these projects are causing disproportionate, negative impact on the urban poor of Fortaleza, and that the experiences of individuals who face that negative impact via threats of displacement manifest in patterns which can be corroborated by documentation. Further, findings suggest that these projects are justified and continued under the justification of sustainability, but social sustainability bias, a crucial pillar to broader sustainability, is missing from the picture. This is important for urban planners and policy makers, more generally, as the systemic biases against the urban poor and marginalized groups within the urban poor are not only being perpetuated, but are being further rationalized by a cooptation of an otherwise promising concept: sustainability.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2015-07-22 without embargo terms","The student, Annie Contractor, accepted the attached license on 2015-04-29 at 14:16.","The student, Annie Contractor, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2015-04-29 at 16:44.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2015-04-30 at 16:37.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #8190 on 2015-07-22 at 10:34:54","Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-22T22:18:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 CONTRACTOR-THESIS-2015.pdf: 2365590 bytes, checksum: b09f1f11e46f16b47bd7a36c4c4164f0 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: 8048bb55adf2f7d74765829dbd6c5805 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-30"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Greenwashing? The global rise of sustainability and forced housing displacement in Fortaleza, Brazil"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Contractor, Annie B"],"dc:date":["2015-07-22T22:18:09Z","2015-05","2015-04-30","2015-5"],"dc:description":["Fortaleza is a lesser-known city of Latin America with over 3.5 million inhabitants, over one-third of whom reside in substandard housing. The city is currently undertaking transportation development projects that are driven by a broader discourse of sustainability, however the outcomes from these projects resemble those associated with urban renewal including slum clearance and public investment for private gain. This study analyzes whether transit projects rooted in sustainability are meeting the triple bottom line of social, economic, and environmental sustainability, with a focus on equitable impacts to both formal and informal settlements. Specifically, this thesis seeks to uncover why infrastructure investments justified as increasing the capacity for sustainability continue to result in the systematic displacement of low-income informal households. To examine the relationships between sustainable infrastructure investments and outcomes including forced displacement, a mixed-methods approach combining a spatial analysis to verify disproportionate impact and interview and document analyses are employed to reveal unique displacement threats. Findings suggest that these projects are causing disproportionate, negative impact on the urban poor of Fortaleza, and that the experiences of individuals who face that negative impact via threats of displacement manifest in patterns which can be corroborated by documentation. Further, findings suggest that these projects are justified and continued under the justification of sustainability, but social sustainability bias, a crucial pillar to broader sustainability, is missing from the picture. This is important for urban planners and policy makers, more generally, as the systemic biases against the urban poor and marginalized groups within the urban poor are not only being perpetuated, but are being further rationalized by a cooptation of an otherwise promising concept: sustainability.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2015-07-22 without embargo terms","The student, Annie Contractor, accepted the attached license on 2015-04-29 at 14:16.","The student, Annie Contractor, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2015-04-29 at 16:44.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2015-04-30 at 16:37.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #8190 on 2015-07-22 at 10:34:54","Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-22T22:18:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 CONTRACTOR-THESIS-2015.pdf: 2365590 bytes, checksum: b09f1f11e46f16b47bd7a36c4c4164f0 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: 8048bb55adf2f7d74765829dbd6c5805 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-30"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/78548"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2015 Annie Contractor"],"dc:subject":["forceful housing displacement","informal housing","urban renewal","gentrification","sustainability","globalization","favela","Fortaleza","Brazil"],"dc:title":["Greenwashing? The global rise of sustainability and forced housing displacement in Fortaleza, Brazil"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Urban Planning"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.U.P."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:11Z"}