{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/78521"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/78521","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Optimal sensor placement","abstract":"In this thesis we explore the problem of finding optimal sensor/actuator locations to achieve the minimum square error/least effort. The solution for the optimal sensor/actuator is often combinational, this means in order to solve for the solution we have to look at many parameters in the system and those parameters change frequently. In this thesis, we propose two methods to achieve this goal: the first one is based on gradient flow differential in which it provides the global optimal solution for the placement, and the second one is based on the evaluation of the Hessian matrix at the critical points. The optimal sensor/actuator location found using the gradient flow or Hessian matrix is usually not sparse. However in practical settings, the optimal sensor/actuator locations are often determined by discrete numbers such as ones and zeroes. We then propose some methods of relating the optimal sensor/actuator locations found using the gradient flow or Hessian matrix to the optimal sensor locations in the practical settings. Next we test the performance of the method we proposed by comparing the square error/effort of the system using the optimal sensor/actuator locations we found and the optimal sensor locations in the practical settings in multiple dimensions and with selected number of sensors/actuators.","abstract_html":"In this thesis we explore the problem of finding optimal sensor/actuator locations to achieve the minimum square error/least effort. The solution for the optimal sensor/actuator is often combinational, this means in order to solve for the solution we have to look at many parameters in the system and those parameters change frequently. In this thesis, we propose two methods to achieve this goal: the first one is based on gradient flow differential in which it provides the global optimal solution for the placement, and the second one is based on the evaluation of the Hessian matrix at the critical points. The optimal sensor/actuator location found using the gradient flow or Hessian matrix is usually not sparse. However in practical settings, the optimal sensor/actuator locations are often determined by discrete numbers such as ones and zeroes. We then propose some methods of relating the optimal sensor/actuator locations found using the gradient flow or Hessian matrix to the optimal sensor locations in the practical settings. Next we test the performance of the method we proposed by comparing the square error/effort of the system using the optimal sensor/actuator locations we found and the optimal sensor locations in the practical settings in multiple dimensions and with selected number of sensors/actuators.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Xu, Xuandong"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Electrical & Computer Engr","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-07-22T22:17:55Z","date_published":"2015-07-22T22:17:55Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:11Z","subjects":["Optimal control","Kalman filter","Stochastic control"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2015 Xuandong Xu"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/78521","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Xu, Xuandong"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-07-22T22:17:55Z","2015-05","2015-04-28","2015-5"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Electrical & Computer Engr"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Optimal control","Kalman filter","Stochastic control"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2015 Xuandong Xu"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/78521"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["In this thesis we explore the problem of finding optimal sensor/actuator locations to achieve the minimum square error/least effort. The solution for the optimal sensor/actuator is often combinational, this means in order to solve for the solution we have to look at many parameters in the system and those parameters change frequently. In this thesis, we propose two methods to achieve this goal: the first one is based on gradient flow differential in which it provides the global optimal solution for the placement, and the second one is based on the evaluation of the Hessian matrix at the critical points. The optimal sensor/actuator location found using the gradient flow or Hessian matrix is usually not sparse. However in practical settings, the optimal sensor/actuator locations are often determined by discrete numbers such as ones and zeroes. We then propose some methods of relating the optimal sensor/actuator locations found using the gradient flow or Hessian matrix to the optimal sensor locations in the practical settings. Next we test the performance of the method we proposed by comparing the square error/effort of the system using the optimal sensor/actuator locations we found and the optimal sensor locations in the practical settings in multiple dimensions and with selected number of sensors/actuators.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2015-07-22 without embargo terms","The student, Xuandong Xu, accepted the attached license on 2015-04-27 at 21:34.","The student, Xuandong Xu, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2015-04-27 at 21:52.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2015-04-28 at 08:32.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #8140 on 2015-07-22 at 10:34:23","Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-22T22:17:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 XU-THESIS-2015.pdf: 1008738 bytes, checksum: 43b66746299232f17039f49dffb51a43 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: 0654f5783e1c907bf268c628a3411890 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-28"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Optimal sensor placement"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Xu, Xuandong"],"dc:date":["2015-07-22T22:17:55Z","2015-05","2015-04-28","2015-5"],"dc:description":["In this thesis we explore the problem of finding optimal sensor/actuator locations to achieve the minimum square error/least effort. The solution for the optimal sensor/actuator is often combinational, this means in order to solve for the solution we have to look at many parameters in the system and those parameters change frequently. In this thesis, we propose two methods to achieve this goal: the first one is based on gradient flow differential in which it provides the global optimal solution for the placement, and the second one is based on the evaluation of the Hessian matrix at the critical points. The optimal sensor/actuator location found using the gradient flow or Hessian matrix is usually not sparse. However in practical settings, the optimal sensor/actuator locations are often determined by discrete numbers such as ones and zeroes. We then propose some methods of relating the optimal sensor/actuator locations found using the gradient flow or Hessian matrix to the optimal sensor locations in the practical settings. Next we test the performance of the method we proposed by comparing the square error/effort of the system using the optimal sensor/actuator locations we found and the optimal sensor locations in the practical settings in multiple dimensions and with selected number of sensors/actuators.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2015-07-22 without embargo terms","The student, Xuandong Xu, accepted the attached license on 2015-04-27 at 21:34.","The student, Xuandong Xu, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2015-04-27 at 21:52.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2015-04-28 at 08:32.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #8140 on 2015-07-22 at 10:34:23","Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-22T22:17:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 XU-THESIS-2015.pdf: 1008738 bytes, checksum: 43b66746299232f17039f49dffb51a43 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: 0654f5783e1c907bf268c628a3411890 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-28"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/78521"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2015 Xuandong Xu"],"dc:subject":["Optimal control","Kalman filter","Stochastic control"],"dc:title":["Optimal sensor placement"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Electrical & Computer Engr"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:11Z"}