{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/72956"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/72956","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Speed limits and red flags: why number agreement accidents happen","abstract":"Trouble in language production sometimes surfaces in errors and sometimes surfaces in delays. Since these two symptoms of difficulty can trade off, theories may make predictions that are confirmed with measures of accuracy but disconfirmed with measures of speed, and vice-versa. In work on grammatical agreement in particular, there are accounts of variability in verb number production that emphasize the roles of lexical sources of number information and accounts that emphasize structural sources. Depending on whether speed or accuracy is measured these alternative views can differ in the success of their predictions. To evaluate the alternatives, we carried out six experiments gauging speed and accuracy together in producing agreement. The data were analyzed using a statistical method that integrates speed and accuracy into a coherent framework. The findings demonstrate that grammatical agreement mechanisms are substantially more sensitive to conceptual than to lexical forces, confirming a central hypothesis of a structural account of sentence production.","abstract_html":"Trouble in language production sometimes surfaces in errors and sometimes surfaces in delays. Since these two symptoms of difficulty can trade off, theories may make predictions that are confirmed with measures of accuracy but disconfirmed with measures of speed, and vice-versa. In work on grammatical agreement in particular, there are accounts of variability in verb number production that emphasize the roles of lexical sources of number information and accounts that emphasize structural sources. Depending on whether speed or accuracy is measured these alternative views can differ in the success of their predictions. To evaluate the alternatives, we carried out six experiments gauging speed and accuracy together in producing agreement. The data were analyzed using a statistical method that integrates speed and accuracy into a coherent framework. The findings demonstrate that grammatical agreement mechanisms are substantially more sensitive to conceptual than to lexical forces, confirming a central hypothesis of a structural account of sentence production.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Brehm, Laurel E."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bock, Kathryn","Dell, Gary S.","Fisher, Cynthia","Brown-Schmidt, Sarah","Tanner, Darren"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2015,"date_issued":"2015-01-21T19:54:55Z","date_published":"2015-01-21T19:54:55Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:07Z","subjects":["language production","number agreement","speech errors"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2014 Laurel Brehm"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/72956","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bock, Kathryn","Dell, Gary S.","Fisher, Cynthia","Brown-Schmidt, Sarah","Tanner, Darren"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Brehm, Laurel E."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2015-01-21T19:54:55Z","2017-01-22T10:15:41Z","2014-12","2015-01-21"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["language production","number agreement","speech errors"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2014 Laurel Brehm"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/72956"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Trouble in language production sometimes surfaces in errors and sometimes surfaces in delays. Since these two symptoms of difficulty can trade off, theories may make predictions that are confirmed with measures of accuracy but disconfirmed with measures of speed, and vice-versa. In work on grammatical agreement in particular, there are accounts of variability in verb number production that emphasize the roles of lexical sources of number information and accounts that emphasize structural sources. Depending on whether speed or accuracy is measured these alternative views can differ in the success of their predictions. To evaluate the alternatives, we carried out six experiments gauging speed and accuracy together in producing agreement. The data were analyzed using a statistical method that integrates speed and accuracy into a coherent framework. The findings demonstrate that grammatical agreement mechanisms are substantially more sensitive to conceptual than to lexical forces, confirming a central hypothesis of a structural account of sentence production.","Item withdrawn by Laura Spradlin (lspradl2@illinois.edu) on 2014-08-28T18:48:03Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Brehm_Laurel.pdf: 5012640 bytes, checksum: d1c27d1425b36d6efd39894bb1df3965 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2015-01-21T19:54:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Laurel_Brehm.pdf: 5012640 bytes, checksum: d1c27d1425b36d6efd39894bb1df3965 (MD5)","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 73145 Lift date: 2017-01-21T19:56:18Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 73145 on 2017-01-22T10:15:41Z."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Speed limits and red flags: why number agreement accidents happen"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bock, Kathryn","Dell, Gary S.","Fisher, Cynthia","Brown-Schmidt, Sarah","Tanner, Darren"],"dc:creator":["Brehm, Laurel E."],"dc:date":["2015-01-21T19:54:55Z","2017-01-22T10:15:41Z","2014-12","2015-01-21"],"dc:description":["Trouble in language production sometimes surfaces in errors and sometimes surfaces in delays. Since these two symptoms of difficulty can trade off, theories may make predictions that are confirmed with measures of accuracy but disconfirmed with measures of speed, and vice-versa. In work on grammatical agreement in particular, there are accounts of variability in verb number production that emphasize the roles of lexical sources of number information and accounts that emphasize structural sources. Depending on whether speed or accuracy is measured these alternative views can differ in the success of their predictions. To evaluate the alternatives, we carried out six experiments gauging speed and accuracy together in producing agreement. The data were analyzed using a statistical method that integrates speed and accuracy into a coherent framework. The findings demonstrate that grammatical agreement mechanisms are substantially more sensitive to conceptual than to lexical forces, confirming a central hypothesis of a structural account of sentence production.","Item withdrawn by Laura Spradlin (lspradl2@illinois.edu) on 2014-08-28T18:48:03Z Item was in collections: University of Illinois Theses & Dissertations (ID: 1) No. of bitstreams: 1 Brehm_Laurel.pdf: 5012640 bytes, checksum: d1c27d1425b36d6efd39894bb1df3965 (MD5)","Made available in DSpace on 2015-01-21T19:54:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Laurel_Brehm.pdf: 5012640 bytes, checksum: d1c27d1425b36d6efd39894bb1df3965 (MD5)","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 73145 Lift date: 2017-01-21T19:56:18Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 73145 on 2017-01-22T10:15:41Z."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/72956"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2014 Laurel Brehm"],"dc:subject":["language production","number agreement","speech errors"],"dc:title":["Speed limits and red flags: why number agreement accidents happen"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:07Z"}