{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/71511"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/71511","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Valuation of Stock Index Futures and Their Relation to the Underlying Index: Theory and Evidence (Hedging)","abstract":"Five hedging models representing a range of hedger motivation and attitudes to risk were applied to the three stock index futures. Both optimal hedge ratios and measures of effectiveness were calculated. It was found that the models worked well with stock index futures: the various criteria (utility maximization, variance minimization, basis arbitrage) were met using plausible optimal ratios. Both the exchange and the maturity of the contract used affected hedging behavior. Various pricing models were also applied to the futures: a simple cost of carry, a general equilibrium pricing model using systematic risk, and a forward-pricing model using compounded index value less a continuously compounded expected dividend component. The expected dividends were estimated using two time series models. It was found that the simple cost of carry was inadequate to explain price movements. The systematic risk of the contracts, as expected, approached the risk level of the market. The forward-pricing model resulted in prices which were slightly biased upward. Finally, the distributional characteristics and the independence of the contract prices were analyzed. All three of the futures were found to have slightly leptokurtic distributions. In addition, the New York contracts (NYSE index) were found to be negatively autocorrelated.","abstract_html":"Five hedging models representing a range of hedger motivation and attitudes to risk were applied to the three stock index futures. Both optimal hedge ratios and measures of effectiveness were calculated. It was found that the models worked well with stock index futures: the various criteria (utility maximization, variance minimization, basis arbitrage) were met using plausible optimal ratios. Both the exchange and the maturity of the contract used affected hedging behavior. Various pricing models were also applied to the futures: a simple cost of carry, a general equilibrium pricing model using systematic risk, and a forward-pricing model using compounded index value less a continuously compounded expected dividend component. The expected dividends were estimated using two time series models. It was found that the simple cost of carry was inadequate to explain price movements. The systematic risk of the contracts, as expected, approached the risk level of the market. The forward-pricing model resulted in prices which were slightly biased upward. Finally, the distributional characteristics and the independence of the contract prices were analyzed. All three of the futures were found to have slightly leptokurtic distributions. In addition, the New York contracts (NYSE index) were found to be negatively autocorrelated.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Junkus, Joan C."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Finance","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-12-16T18:34:46Z","date_published":"2014-12-16T18:34:46Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:05Z","subjects":["Economics, Finance"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(UMI)AAI8409787"],"render_values":[{"text":"(UMI)AAI8409787","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/71511","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Junkus, Joan C."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2014-12-16T18:34:46Z","10000-01-01","1984"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Finance"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Economics, Finance"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/71511","(UMI)AAI8409787"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Five hedging models representing a range of hedger motivation and attitudes to risk were applied to the three stock index futures. Both optimal hedge ratios and measures of effectiveness were calculated. It was found that the models worked well with stock index futures: the various criteria (utility maximization, variance minimization, basis arbitrage) were met using plausible optimal ratios. Both the exchange and the maturity of the contract used affected hedging behavior. Various pricing models were also applied to the futures: a simple cost of carry, a general equilibrium pricing model using systematic risk, and a forward-pricing model using compounded index value less a continuously compounded expected dividend component. The expected dividends were estimated using two time series models. It was found that the simple cost of carry was inadequate to explain price movements. The systematic risk of the contracts, as expected, approached the risk level of the market. The forward-pricing model resulted in prices which were slightly biased upward. Finally, the distributional characteristics and the independence of the contract prices were analyzed. All three of the futures were found to have slightly leptokurtic distributions. In addition, the New York contracts (NYSE index) were found to be negatively autocorrelated.","Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-16T18:34:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 8409787.pdf: 9855048 bytes, checksum: b82c8c25a80128701fc555f3bd0ebea2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1984","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 71677 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","265 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Valuation of Stock Index Futures and Their Relation to the Underlying Index: Theory and Evidence (Hedging)"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Junkus, Joan C."],"dc:date":["2014-12-16T18:34:46Z","10000-01-01","1984"],"dc:description":["Five hedging models representing a range of hedger motivation and attitudes to risk were applied to the three stock index futures. Both optimal hedge ratios and measures of effectiveness were calculated. It was found that the models worked well with stock index futures: the various criteria (utility maximization, variance minimization, basis arbitrage) were met using plausible optimal ratios. Both the exchange and the maturity of the contract used affected hedging behavior. Various pricing models were also applied to the futures: a simple cost of carry, a general equilibrium pricing model using systematic risk, and a forward-pricing model using compounded index value less a continuously compounded expected dividend component. The expected dividends were estimated using two time series models. It was found that the simple cost of carry was inadequate to explain price movements. The systematic risk of the contracts, as expected, approached the risk level of the market. The forward-pricing model resulted in prices which were slightly biased upward. Finally, the distributional characteristics and the independence of the contract prices were analyzed. All three of the futures were found to have slightly leptokurtic distributions. In addition, the New York contracts (NYSE index) were found to be negatively autocorrelated.","Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-16T18:34:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 8409787.pdf: 9855048 bytes, checksum: b82c8c25a80128701fc555f3bd0ebea2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1984","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 71677 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","265 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/71511","(UMI)AAI8409787"],"dc:subject":["Economics, Finance"],"dc:title":["Valuation of Stock Index Futures and Their Relation to the Underlying Index: Theory and Evidence (Hedging)"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Finance"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:05Z"}