{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/69809"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/69809","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Images as Defense Policy Determinants in the Soviet-American Military Relationship Since 1945","abstract":"The objective of this study is to explain the impact of Soviet and American images of the strategic environment on defense policy and its formulation. This objective is accomplished by comparing the structure of Soviet and American military thought in the context of their respective strategic cultures. While ethnocentrism is reflected in both systems, its impact is different in the two strategic cultures. The intellectual construct created by Soviet military thought is substantially determined by the dialectical framework of the ideological struggle constituting the operationalization of the Soviet assumption of systemic conflict. This results in a zero-sum view of Soviet-American relations, and focuses Soviet military thought on new requirements for military science. On the other hand, because American defense policy is less ideologically focused, American military thought becomes largely a policy debate over how to "contain" the Soviet Union and "deter" its use of military power. Therefore, Soviet military thought has more of an operational focus and American military thought more of a political strategy focus. Soviet and American military thought, for this reason, interact with each other's military policy at different levels. This has led to an evolution of Soviet perceptions of military sufficiency that provides additional operational flexibility while American perceptions of Soviet military power mostly generated additional policy disputes.","abstract_html":"The objective of this study is to explain the impact of Soviet and American images of the strategic environment on defense policy and its formulation. This objective is accomplished by comparing the structure of Soviet and American military thought in the context of their respective strategic cultures. While ethnocentrism is reflected in both systems, its impact is different in the two strategic cultures. The intellectual construct created by Soviet military thought is substantially determined by the dialectical framework of the ideological struggle constituting the operationalization of the Soviet assumption of systemic conflict. This results in a zero-sum view of Soviet-American relations, and focuses Soviet military thought on new requirements for military science. On the other hand, because American defense policy is less ideologically focused, American military thought becomes largely a policy debate over how to "contain" the Soviet Union and "deter" its use of military power. Therefore, Soviet military thought has more of an operational focus and American military thought more of a political strategy focus. Soviet and American military thought, for this reason, interact with each other's military policy at different levels. This has led to an evolution of Soviet perceptions of military sufficiency that provides additional operational flexibility while American perceptions of Soviet military power mostly generated additional policy disputes.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Petersen, Phillip A."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Political Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-12-15T20:01:59Z","date_published":"2014-12-15T20:01:59Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:01Z","subjects":["Political Science, International Law and Relations"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(UMI)AAI8521858"],"render_values":[{"text":"(UMI)AAI8521858","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/69809","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Petersen, Phillip A."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2014-12-15T20:01:59Z","10000-01-01","1985"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Political Science, International Law and Relations"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/69809","(UMI)AAI8521858"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The objective of this study is to explain the impact of Soviet and American images of the strategic environment on defense policy and its formulation. This objective is accomplished by comparing the structure of Soviet and American military thought in the context of their respective strategic cultures. While ethnocentrism is reflected in both systems, its impact is different in the two strategic cultures. The intellectual construct created by Soviet military thought is substantially determined by the dialectical framework of the ideological struggle constituting the operationalization of the Soviet assumption of systemic conflict. This results in a zero-sum view of Soviet-American relations, and focuses Soviet military thought on new requirements for military science. On the other hand, because American defense policy is less ideologically focused, American military thought becomes largely a policy debate over how to "contain" the Soviet Union and "deter" its use of military power. Therefore, Soviet military thought has more of an operational focus and American military thought more of a political strategy focus. Soviet and American military thought, for this reason, interact with each other's military policy at different levels. This has led to an evolution of Soviet perceptions of military sufficiency that provides additional operational flexibility while American perceptions of Soviet military power mostly generated additional policy disputes.","Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-15T20:01:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 8521858.pdf: 17377528 bytes, checksum: 321ca1787aee35986df6de2a932e7cf2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1985","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 69975 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","410 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1985."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Images as Defense Policy Determinants in the Soviet-American Military Relationship Since 1945"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Petersen, Phillip A."],"dc:date":["2014-12-15T20:01:59Z","10000-01-01","1985"],"dc:description":["The objective of this study is to explain the impact of Soviet and American images of the strategic environment on defense policy and its formulation. This objective is accomplished by comparing the structure of Soviet and American military thought in the context of their respective strategic cultures. While ethnocentrism is reflected in both systems, its impact is different in the two strategic cultures. The intellectual construct created by Soviet military thought is substantially determined by the dialectical framework of the ideological struggle constituting the operationalization of the Soviet assumption of systemic conflict. This results in a zero-sum view of Soviet-American relations, and focuses Soviet military thought on new requirements for military science. On the other hand, because American defense policy is less ideologically focused, American military thought becomes largely a policy debate over how to "contain" the Soviet Union and "deter" its use of military power. Therefore, Soviet military thought has more of an operational focus and American military thought more of a political strategy focus. Soviet and American military thought, for this reason, interact with each other's military policy at different levels. This has led to an evolution of Soviet perceptions of military sufficiency that provides additional operational flexibility while American perceptions of Soviet military power mostly generated additional policy disputes.","Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-15T20:01:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 8521858.pdf: 17377528 bytes, checksum: 321ca1787aee35986df6de2a932e7cf2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1985","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 69975 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","410 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1985."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/69809","(UMI)AAI8521858"],"dc:subject":["Political Science, International Law and Relations"],"dc:title":["Images as Defense Policy Determinants in the Soviet-American Military Relationship Since 1945"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:26:01Z"}