{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/68846"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/68846","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The Comprehension of Some Aspects of Figurative Language by Deaf and Hearing Subjects","abstract":"The study was designed to investigate the comprehension of some aspects of figurative language by deaf subjects and to compare their performances with those of hearing subjects. Three groups of deaf children and one group of hearing children were tested. Each group contained 25 children. Each hearing subject studied had an I.Q. of 80 points or more and had at least functional literacy skills, i.e., fourth grade reading level. Deaf subjects had sensorineural hearing losses of 90 dB (ANSI) or more in the better ear averaged over the speech range, i.e., 500 to 2000 Hz. Each deaf subject suffered a hearing loss before the age of two, was from a family where neither parent was deaf, and had an I.Q. of 80 points or more.","abstract_html":"The study was designed to investigate the comprehension of some aspects of figurative language by deaf subjects and to compare their performances with those of hearing subjects. Three groups of deaf children and one group of hearing children were tested. Each group contained 25 children. Each hearing subject studied had an I.Q. of 80 points or more and had at least functional literacy skills, i.e., fourth grade reading level. Deaf subjects had sensorineural hearing losses of 90 dB (ANSI) or more in the better ear averaged over the speech range, i.e., 500 to 2000 Hz. Each deaf subject suffered a hearing loss before the age of two, was from a family where neither parent was deaf, and had an I.Q. of 80 points or more.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Giorcelli, Loretta Rae"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-12-15T18:49:21Z","date_published":"2014-12-15T18:49:21Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:59Z","subjects":["Education, Special"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(UMI)AAI8309945"],"render_values":[{"text":"(UMI)AAI8309945","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/68846","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Giorcelli, Loretta Rae"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2014-12-15T18:49:21Z","10000-01-01","1983"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Education, Special"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/68846","(UMI)AAI8309945"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The study was designed to investigate the comprehension of some aspects of figurative language by deaf subjects and to compare their performances with those of hearing subjects. Three groups of deaf children and one group of hearing children were tested. Each group contained 25 children. Each hearing subject studied had an I.Q. of 80 points or more and had at least functional literacy skills, i.e., fourth grade reading level. Deaf subjects had sensorineural hearing losses of 90 dB (ANSI) or more in the better ear averaged over the speech range, i.e., 500 to 2000 Hz. Each deaf subject suffered a hearing loss before the age of two, was from a family where neither parent was deaf, and had an I.Q. of 80 points or more.","The Test of Figurative Language Competence, composed of 100 multiple-choice items in 10 categories, was created for this study. The test battery measures logical reasoning, linguistic problem solving, associative fluency, associative figurativeness, interpretation of anomaly and discrimination between paraphrases of novel and forzen (idiomatic) metaphors. Reliability, validity and usability criteria were applied to the test battery and high intercorrelations between categories were obtained. No universal order of difficulty was established for categories in the test battery, but hierarchial orders of difficulty were delineated for each group.","Anova and Scheffe contrasts procedures indicated that the hearing subjects (8-9 years) scored significantly higher than all deaf groups combined on overall test performance and on 7 of the 10 subtests. Older deaf subjects (14-20 years) outperformed the younger deaf subjects (10-14 years) on overall test performance and on 7 subtests. The hearing subjects scored significantly better than the younger deaf subjects on 9 subtests and on the overall performance.","This study suggests that increased significance be placed on the teaching of figurative language skills to deaf subjects. Reforms in reading materials for deaf students are also recommended so that written language will more accurately reflect the figurative nature of the English language.","Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-15T18:49:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 8309945.pdf: 4810080 bytes, checksum: ece07437b3a1c9caedc1543110ce066c (MD5) Previous issue date: 1983","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 69012 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","189 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1983."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Comprehension of Some Aspects of Figurative Language by Deaf and Hearing Subjects"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Giorcelli, Loretta Rae"],"dc:date":["2014-12-15T18:49:21Z","10000-01-01","1983"],"dc:description":["The study was designed to investigate the comprehension of some aspects of figurative language by deaf subjects and to compare their performances with those of hearing subjects. Three groups of deaf children and one group of hearing children were tested. Each group contained 25 children. Each hearing subject studied had an I.Q. of 80 points or more and had at least functional literacy skills, i.e., fourth grade reading level. Deaf subjects had sensorineural hearing losses of 90 dB (ANSI) or more in the better ear averaged over the speech range, i.e., 500 to 2000 Hz. Each deaf subject suffered a hearing loss before the age of two, was from a family where neither parent was deaf, and had an I.Q. of 80 points or more.","The Test of Figurative Language Competence, composed of 100 multiple-choice items in 10 categories, was created for this study. The test battery measures logical reasoning, linguistic problem solving, associative fluency, associative figurativeness, interpretation of anomaly and discrimination between paraphrases of novel and forzen (idiomatic) metaphors. Reliability, validity and usability criteria were applied to the test battery and high intercorrelations between categories were obtained. No universal order of difficulty was established for categories in the test battery, but hierarchial orders of difficulty were delineated for each group.","Anova and Scheffe contrasts procedures indicated that the hearing subjects (8-9 years) scored significantly higher than all deaf groups combined on overall test performance and on 7 of the 10 subtests. Older deaf subjects (14-20 years) outperformed the younger deaf subjects (10-14 years) on overall test performance and on 7 subtests. The hearing subjects scored significantly better than the younger deaf subjects on 9 subtests and on the overall performance.","This study suggests that increased significance be placed on the teaching of figurative language skills to deaf subjects. Reforms in reading materials for deaf students are also recommended so that written language will more accurately reflect the figurative nature of the English language.","Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-15T18:49:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 8309945.pdf: 4810080 bytes, checksum: ece07437b3a1c9caedc1543110ce066c (MD5) Previous issue date: 1983","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 69012 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","U of I Only","189 p.","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1983."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/68846","(UMI)AAI8309945"],"dc:subject":["Education, Special"],"dc:title":["The Comprehension of Some Aspects of Figurative Language by Deaf and Hearing Subjects"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:59Z"}