{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/67323"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/67323","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Determinants of Cue Choice Behavior","abstract":"144 p.","abstract_html":"144 p.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Schellinck, Douglas Anton"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Business Administration","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014-12-13T20:21:49Z","date_published":"2014-12-13T20:21:49Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:57Z","subjects":["Business Administration, Marketing"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["(UMI)AAI8108653"],"render_values":[{"text":"(UMI)AAI8108653","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/67323","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Schellinck, Douglas Anton"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2014-12-13T20:21:49Z","10000-01-01","1980"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Business Administration"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Business Administration, Marketing"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/67323","(UMI)AAI8108653"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["144 p.","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 67501 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","This research reports the results of an experiment examining the effect of time pressure, perceived risk and accountability on people's choice of cues perceived as high in predictive value and low in confidence value versus cues perceived as low in predictive value and high in confidence value. In phase one of the study, fifty subjects from a subject pool of university undergraduate students rated a set of fifteen product cues on predictive and confidence value. Eight cues were then selected for the second phase of the experiment, four rated high on predictive value but low in confidence value, and four rated low in predictive value and high in confidence value. Phase two was a factorial 2 x 2 x 2 experiment with 208 subjects from the same subject pool as phase one. Subjects were asked to appraise the quality of five brands of pagers (beepers) using only four of the eight cues available for each brand.","Three hypotheses are presented and tested. They are (1) As time pressure increases there will be a greater tendency to depend on high confidence value cues. (2) As performance uncertainty increases there is a greater tendency to depend on high predictive value cues. (3) If a person feels accountable to another person for his decision the tendency to depend on high predictive value cues will be greater.","Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-13T20:21:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 8108653.pdf: 4394640 bytes, checksum: 4f315bdc6aed61aaf3cf190a434caabf (MD5) Previous issue date: 1980","U of I Only","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1980."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Determinants of Cue Choice Behavior"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Schellinck, Douglas Anton"],"dc:date":["2014-12-13T20:21:49Z","10000-01-01","1980"],"dc:description":["144 p.","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 67501 Lift date: Forever Reason: Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","Restricted to the U of I community idenfinitely during batch ingest of legacy ETDs","This research reports the results of an experiment examining the effect of time pressure, perceived risk and accountability on people's choice of cues perceived as high in predictive value and low in confidence value versus cues perceived as low in predictive value and high in confidence value. In phase one of the study, fifty subjects from a subject pool of university undergraduate students rated a set of fifteen product cues on predictive and confidence value. Eight cues were then selected for the second phase of the experiment, four rated high on predictive value but low in confidence value, and four rated low in predictive value and high in confidence value. Phase two was a factorial 2 x 2 x 2 experiment with 208 subjects from the same subject pool as phase one. Subjects were asked to appraise the quality of five brands of pagers (beepers) using only four of the eight cues available for each brand.","Three hypotheses are presented and tested. They are (1) As time pressure increases there will be a greater tendency to depend on high confidence value cues. (2) As performance uncertainty increases there is a greater tendency to depend on high predictive value cues. (3) If a person feels accountable to another person for his decision the tendency to depend on high predictive value cues will be greater.","Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-13T20:21:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 8108653.pdf: 4394640 bytes, checksum: 4f315bdc6aed61aaf3cf190a434caabf (MD5) Previous issue date: 1980","U of I Only","Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1980."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/67323","(UMI)AAI8108653"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:subject":["Business Administration, Marketing"],"dc:title":["Determinants of Cue Choice Behavior"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Business Administration"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:25:57Z"}